Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours >

Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2011 | 04:49 AM
  #41  
NWA320pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: 737 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
So you've been out practicing slow flight/stalls in an airliner recently?
According to the FAA one of the definitions of slow flight is: The establishment, maintenance of, and maneuvering of the airplane at airspeeds and in configurations appropriate to takeoffs, climbs, descents, landing approaches and go-arounds.

So in essence yes we practice slow flight in airliners daily.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 05:46 AM
  #42  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DirectTo
There is a massive difference between teaching stalls and flying into ice and picking through storms (not something your average instructor will be doing in light singles I'll bet).
There really isn't a difference. It's called being on your own & gaining situational awareness. It was never just about teaching stalls. You had to constantly be aware of your students abilities, and where you were going if the engine quit. Where were you going on a cross country if your student became ill? What happened if a thunderstorm popped up and you couldn't get back to your airport? Seems like simple stuff now, but to low time guys who haven't made a lot of decisions it's can be complicated.

I put my instrument students in IMC all the time. I wasn't teaching them to fly under foggles. I was teaching them to fly in IMC. Never did I intentionally, but I did get into ice or near thunderstorms, & it taught me a lot.

I had plenty of 500 hour puppy mill FO's when I was an RJ CA. We got along great, but many of them lacked the basic situation awareness to really operate the airplane in a 121 environment. One flew me right through the localizer on a visual approach to parallel runways in 10 SM of visibility because he didn't have a Flight Director to follow. I should have never let it happen, but I went heads down for a minute and he's 8 miles out doing 250 kias blowing right into the path of another airplane. Others couldn't even do a visual approach without an ILS to the runway, even if they had a PAPI/VASI. And don't even get me started on when we were down in Mexico!

I had over 1100 hours when I got hired at my regional, and I don't think that was enough time. It took several months on line before I was comfortable. I strongly support the ATP requirement. Your Pt 135 experience is a great way to cut your teeth too, and you have to have quite of bit of time to be a 135 PIC. We need to shut down these pilot puppy mill operations, because they continue to hurt this occupation.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 05:51 AM
  #43  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Disregard.........

Last edited by johnso29; 06-29-2011 at 06:02 AM.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 06:33 AM
  #44  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by j1b3h0
I just read 15 pages of pontificating about the 1500 hour/ATP FAR and whether or not it matters. As Captains, would anyone care to cite examples of exactly how inexperience reveals itself on the line? Myself, an unabashed proponent of higher minimums and an ATP, if, for no other reason than consistency: FAR 135.243 requires 1200 hrs to fly a piston twin full of mail bags as a PIC. Doesn't it stand to reason that to occupy an airliner cockpit would require at least that?
So, please share with us your anecdotal evidence of why inexperienced crew members compromise safety.
It doesn't matter. 1500 rule can't physically happen. A career circiling the drain = no future pilots. They will have to make training harder or something, fix the "law" but low timers will be here to stay.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 06:57 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: non acceptus excretus
Default

Originally Posted by DirectTo
Well please, by all means explain it then, I clearly didn't learn it at my "puppy mill".

There is no way that in 500-1000 hours of CFI'ing versus flying 1900s, even at Gulfstream, is going to build more skills that apply to the airlines.

If he had done 500 hours of instructing them 500 of the 1900 gig, sure, he would no doubt have received some good experience. But to suggest that between one or another that pure CFI'ing is the better preparation for airline flying is ridiculous.
There is a tremendous amount to be said for CFI experience during the 250 to 1500 hour range, especially since the airplane is flown in a lot of regimes that are seldom if ever seen in scheduled operations(particularly 121). That said if Captain Renslow had done some CFI'ing instead of 250 hours to the right seat and "Gear up auto pilot ON" The stall recovery would almost certainly have gone satisfactorily. There are many other flying "jobs" that build or solidify flying skills that should be flown BEFORE 121 where the risk curve drops. Then fly for a regional to get experience for the airlines don't skip steps, that leads to an incomplete pilot.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 07:28 AM
  #46  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4
It doesn't matter. 1500 rule can't physically happen. A career circiling the drain = no future pilots. They will have to make training harder or something, fix the "law" but low timers will be here to stay.
Again, the law has been past.
Again, 1500+ was the de-facto rule for years. Those hired with less than 1500 should feel very lucky.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 07:54 AM
  #47  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by j1b3h0
Gentlemen: I guess what I was asking is for examples of situations Captains have witnessed during which the inexperience of a First Officer somehow made the situation less safe.
Flying pure visual approaches: The "box pattern" turns into an ovoid. Straight ins with no vertical guidance, the guys aren't sure when to leave pattern altitude, or what rate to descend.

On non-precision approaches: The don't mentally plan a VDP. We break out eight miles from the runway at 600 AGL, and you really want to start your decent here? Or, the missed approach point is the runway threshold, 2/10ths of a mile out the clouds part, and he wants to dive for the runway.

About half the time we get non-standard holding instructions they cannot figure out where we are supposed to be of how to enter (usually they invert it). I know it can be confusing (that is why I still draw it out on paper), but that is basic IFR.

In the round out or flair or whatever is the current term for the last 20 seconds before touchdown. They never learn to be smooth. Winds calm, speed is good, power coming back, and they are sawing away on the yoke like a logger. The plane never rolls, but his hands and the ailerons are goin' like a bat outa Hades.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 08:03 AM
  #48  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
And don't even get me started on when we were down in Mexico!
.
What? You got a problem with doing a DME arc to a tear drop to a VOR approach without radar?
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 08:09 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I put my instrument students in IMC all the time. I wasn't teaching them to fly under foggles. I was teaching them to fly in IMC. Never did I intentionally, but I did get into ice or near thunderstorms, & it taught me a lot.
You are the exception to the rule. In fact the FBO that I got my tickets from doesn't even allow training on "non-vfr" days

Last edited by johnso29; 06-29-2011 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old 06-29-2011 | 08:12 AM
  #50  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 562
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I had plenty of 500 hour puppy mill FO's when I was an RJ CA. We got along great, but many of them lacked the basic situation awareness to really operate the airplane in a 121 environment. One flew me right through the localizer on a visual approach to parallel runways in 10 SM of visibility because he didn't have a Flight Director to follow. I should have never let it happen, but I went heads down for a minute and he's 8 miles out doing 250 kias blowing right into the path of another airplane. Others couldn't even do a visual approach without an ILS to the runway, even if they had a PAPI/VASI. And don't even get me started on when we were down in Mexico!
Speaking as an FO, I have done 4-5 "saves" of captains who were blowing past our runway to line up on a parallel

Last edited by johnso29; 06-29-2011 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Cargo
3
11-28-2015 05:38 AM
ATCsaidDoWhat
Major
21
09-20-2010 03:22 AM
n287hg
Regional
35
10-12-2009 06:40 AM
duvie
Regional
31
08-03-2009 09:00 AM
mjarosz
Regional
6
05-20-2009 05:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices