Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours
#41
According to the FAA one of the definitions of slow flight is: The establishment, maintenance of, and maneuvering of the airplane at airspeeds and in configurations appropriate to takeoffs, climbs, descents, landing approaches and go-arounds.
So in essence yes we practice slow flight in airliners daily.
So in essence yes we practice slow flight in airliners daily.
#42
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
I put my instrument students in IMC all the time. I wasn't teaching them to fly under foggles. I was teaching them to fly in IMC. Never did I intentionally, but I did get into ice or near thunderstorms, & it taught me a lot.
I had plenty of 500 hour puppy mill FO's when I was an RJ CA. We got along great, but many of them lacked the basic situation awareness to really operate the airplane in a 121 environment. One flew me right through the localizer on a visual approach to parallel runways in 10 SM of visibility because he didn't have a Flight Director to follow. I should have never let it happen, but I went heads down for a minute and he's 8 miles out doing 250 kias blowing right into the path of another airplane. Others couldn't even do a visual approach without an ILS to the runway, even if they had a PAPI/VASI. And don't even get me started on when we were down in Mexico!

I had over 1100 hours when I got hired at my regional, and I don't think that was enough time. It took several months on line before I was comfortable. I strongly support the ATP requirement. Your Pt 135 experience is a great way to cut your teeth too, and you have to have quite of bit of time to be a 135 PIC. We need to shut down these pilot puppy mill operations, because they continue to hurt this occupation.
#44
I just read 15 pages of pontificating about the 1500 hour/ATP FAR and whether or not it matters. As Captains, would anyone care to cite examples of exactly how inexperience reveals itself on the line? Myself, an unabashed proponent of higher minimums and an ATP, if, for no other reason than consistency: FAR 135.243 requires 1200 hrs to fly a piston twin full of mail bags as a PIC. Doesn't it stand to reason that to occupy an airliner cockpit would require at least that?
So, please share with us your anecdotal evidence of why inexperienced crew members compromise safety.
So, please share with us your anecdotal evidence of why inexperienced crew members compromise safety.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: non acceptus excretus
Well please, by all means explain it then, I clearly didn't learn it at my "puppy mill".
There is no way that in 500-1000 hours of CFI'ing versus flying 1900s, even at Gulfstream, is going to build more skills that apply to the airlines.
If he had done 500 hours of instructing them 500 of the 1900 gig, sure, he would no doubt have received some good experience. But to suggest that between one or another that pure CFI'ing is the better preparation for airline flying is ridiculous.
There is no way that in 500-1000 hours of CFI'ing versus flying 1900s, even at Gulfstream, is going to build more skills that apply to the airlines.
If he had done 500 hours of instructing them 500 of the 1900 gig, sure, he would no doubt have received some good experience. But to suggest that between one or another that pure CFI'ing is the better preparation for airline flying is ridiculous.
#46
Are we there yet??!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Again, 1500+ was the de-facto rule for years. Those hired with less than 1500 should feel very lucky.
#47
On non-precision approaches: The don't mentally plan a VDP. We break out eight miles from the runway at 600 AGL, and you really want to start your decent here? Or, the missed approach point is the runway threshold, 2/10ths of a mile out the clouds part, and he wants to dive for the runway.
About half the time we get non-standard holding instructions they cannot figure out where we are supposed to be of how to enter (usually they invert it). I know it can be confusing (that is why I still draw it out on paper), but that is basic IFR.
In the round out or flair or whatever is the current term for the last 20 seconds before touchdown. They never learn to be smooth. Winds calm, speed is good, power coming back, and they are sawing away on the yoke like a logger. The plane never rolls, but his hands and the ailerons are goin' like a bat outa Hades.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
You are the exception to the rule. In fact the FBO that I got my tickets from doesn't even allow training on "non-vfr" days
Last edited by johnso29; 06-29-2011 at 08:45 AM.
#50
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 562
From: Pilot
I had plenty of 500 hour puppy mill FO's when I was an RJ CA. We got along great, but many of them lacked the basic situation awareness to really operate the airplane in a 121 environment. One flew me right through the localizer on a visual approach to parallel runways in 10 SM of visibility because he didn't have a Flight Director to follow. I should have never let it happen, but I went heads down for a minute and he's 8 miles out doing 250 kias blowing right into the path of another airplane. Others couldn't even do a visual approach without an ILS to the runway, even if they had a PAPI/VASI. And don't even get me started on when we were down in Mexico! 

Last edited by johnso29; 06-29-2011 at 08:45 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



