Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Jumping from 9E/XJ/9L to Skywest >

Jumping from 9E/XJ/9L to Skywest

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Jumping from 9E/XJ/9L to Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:23 AM
  #31  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
Then explain to me why Pinnacle took the brunt of the displacements? Your position on the master list doesn't matter when it comes to upgrade, because XJ guys have ample room under your fences with more clearing out with flow.
9E guys are being displaced because more senior XJ Saab guys are moving over into those positions.

Where else are they going to go?

And XJ and 9E fences are full, that's why Colgan guys are able to bid 900 captain and 200 captain positions.

Trust me, 9E did not get hosed in this SLI, the guys being displaced just had made captain prior to the SLI coming out, most of the XJ guys coming over to 9E have many many more years of service than the 9E guy above them in their new position.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:25 AM
  #32  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,128
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by PruneJuice
I have to ask why?
Skywest has grown this year and could grow even more if they get the q400. Asa lost 8 and wll probably lose 6 more, xjt could lose 27 in april.
Also look at the bases, skywest (in my opinion) has the bettet bases and if there were to be a merger xjt/asa would try and snag sone positions in those.
Skywest has the brighter future as well a more diverse fleet and contracts.
So agaib I have to ask why? Why risk getting bumped out of a base that belongs to you and risk a furlough because of something at another airline?
An acceptable SLI would include fences.

But really...the three INC airlines will not thrive, wither, or fail in isolation from one another. Any perceived unitary success will be artificial contrived by SGU. The company will most certainly whipsaw one against the other in the future if it offers a benefit.

In the long term SKW will not thrive alone while surejet fails...the company would request (and surejet pilots would certainly accept) major concessions if threatened with comair-style cutbacks. Then higher-paid SKW would lose planes...

Ultimately we are all in it together so we might as well take pilot compensation out of the game at least within the company. Goodness we still have to worry about it with the likes of gojet, mesa, etc.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:51 AM
  #33  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Pros: SkyWest has better work rules. Name call if you like, but ask most guys here and even with cousin Chip at the helm, we're still better off than most.

Cons: Although every regional has their lifer contingent, I think SkyWest has a proportionally larger group than most (save maybe eagle). So you won't see quite the mass exodus at SkyWest that will likely happen at many others. Therefore, upgrade will be slower.

Verdict: From what little I know, unless your QOL depends on being out west, I would stay at Pinacolaba.

On a side note, I'd support one list as well. Like Rickair said, we're gonna sink or swim together. I think both pilot groups have a pretty similar mindset now and neither wants to give up our current work rules or pay scales just to get more movement. Whipsawing the two groups wouldn't be that easy. As its stands (currently) I think ASA/XJT will bid for east coast regional feed (much more competitive due to the number of carriers competing) and SKW will continue to try and take over the west coast. I imagine there'll probably be whipsawing down the road, but not for another couple years when the regionals face mass shrinkage or growth and things get much more cut-throat.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:54 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
most of the XJ guys coming over to 9E have many many more years of service than the 9E guy above them in their new position.
Wrong. You lose credibility when you ignore facts. And it becomes clear to me that you only care about your poor little self, and couldn't give spit over what is fair and equitable. Perhaps we should share your sentiment.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:54 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
9E guys are being displaced because more senior XJ Saab guys are moving over into those positions.

Where else are they going to go?

And XJ and 9E fences are full, that's why Colgan guys are able to bid 900 captain and 200 captain positions.

Trust me, 9E did not get hosed in this SLI, the guys being displaced just had made captain prior to the SLI coming out, most of the XJ guys coming over to 9E have many many more years of service than the 9E guy above them in their new position.
I'd say 9E did in fact get hosed in the SLI. As separate entities, these XJ positions would've disappeared and the pilots being downgraded would've been XJ captains. As a combined company, the XJ pilots have the opportunity to push Pinnacle captains... who would've otherwise been able to keep their seats... back to FO.

How is it not getting hosed when another airline's pilots come in and push you out of your seat that would've otherwise been yours?
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:59 AM
  #36  
donk74's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Gear Thrower
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
I don't agree, when half of 9E's current group is in the top 3rd of the new company.

And then the turboprop FO grouping of the SLI went below all jet FO's.
This is not true and you just contradicted yourself in your most recent post.... I am loosing seniority on the jet because of senior Prop FOs from both 9L and XJ moving over to the jet. What I have issue with is the double standard of the fences for Captain slots which are horribly skewed against all 9E FOs. With the different methods for determining numbers of captain slots for each group as well as all 9E FOs being specifically excluded from upgrade into a SAAB. I went 220 numbers from upgrade to 595 so I would say that the 9E FOs lost out on the most with this SLI... And why are so many 9Es Captains being displaced with no 9L or XJ captains. If I was on the bottom of 9Es list I would leave with only a couple of months here.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 09:59 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
9E guys are being displaced because more senior XJ Saab guys are moving over into those positions.

Where else are they going to go?

And XJ and 9E fences are full, that's why Colgan guys are able to bid 900 captain and 200 captain positions.

Trust me, 9E did not get hosed in this SLI, the guys being displaced just had made captain prior to the SLI coming out, most of the XJ guys coming over to 9E have many many more years of service than the 9E guy above them in their new position.
so this brings us back to my question earlier that no one answered. When it comes time to furlough do we do it out of seniority order to maintain quotas? Our JCBA is very clear on how furloughs are to be handled. Does the JCBA trump the arbitrated ruling? Is it possible to get furloughed while there are people junior to you on the Q simply because they have to maintain a certain amount of people from colgan on the Q?

For example lets say I am 900 on the new seniority list and fly the 200 at pinnacle. Lets also say the most junior guy on the Q is a 2000 number. Now when the 200's get parked and i am displaced would i be able to go to the Q or would I get furloughed because they have to maintain the quota of captains.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 10:53 AM
  #38  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
so this brings us back to my question earlier that no one answered. When it comes time to furlough do we do it out of seniority order to maintain quotas? Our JCBA is very clear on how furloughs are to be handled. Does the JCBA trump the arbitrated ruling? Is it possible to get furloughed while there are people junior to you on the Q simply because they have to maintain a certain amount of people from colgan on the Q?

For example lets say I am 900 on the new seniority list and fly the 200 at pinnacle. Lets also say the most junior guy on the Q is a 2000 number. Now when the 200's get parked and i am displaced would i be able to go to the Q or would I get furloughed because they have to maintain the quota of captains.
Quotas are for Captains, as you had stated, so a scenario where a 200 or a Q CA would be furloughed assumes that all the FOs junior on the list have been furloughed as well. This would be a bad scenario.

However, in you scenario you would not be able to go to the Q if Colgan was still under their Q fence because of the arbitration language which states that you can not be "awarded or displaced" into a Q unless Colgan maintains the fence quota. I do not know if that would decided who gets furloughed but it would decide if that 200 pilot could fly the Q or not. Also, that same 200 9E PCL pilot would not be allowed to fly the Saab either for the next 5 years.
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 11:17 AM
  #39  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
I'd say 9E did in fact get hosed in the SLI. As separate entities, these XJ positions would've disappeared and the pilots being downgraded would've been XJ captains. As a combined company, the XJ pilots have the opportunity to push Pinnacle captains... who would've otherwise been able to keep their seats... back to FO.

How is it not getting hosed when another airline's pilots come in and push you out of your seat that would've otherwise been yours?
I do not fault any 9E pilot from having anger regarding the look of this realignment and the possible writing on the walls for future realignments. The 9E FOs will feel the most of the burden along with junior 9E Captains.

However what I do not understand is the 9E anger towards 9L and XJ. You do not like the decision handed down by the judge why aren't you more upset with the lawyers (Merger Committee) that represented your case in front of the judge? The Arbitrator based his decision on what was presented to him by the 3 sides. Bloch did not have any ill will towards the pilots of 9E, he based his decision on what was presented throughout the process.

Moving forward 9E will feel the most pain of the decision, that is a unfortunate fact for 9E pilots. Rememeber that you had 3 pilots who represented you throughout this process and the fact that it did not end up well should rest on their shoulders, not the pilots of 9L and XJ
Reply
Old 08-28-2011 | 11:48 AM
  #40  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 85
Default

It was the company that staffed so slim. Those were the numbers Bloch used for quotas.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Drums4life
Regional
107
08-16-2011 11:21 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices