DFW / AA to get 100 seat jets??? (Wild Rumor)
#71
It is really cute how some Mod hijacked the thread title and injected his own personal opinion into it (wild rumor).
Maybe he didn't realize that the original thread title was a QUESTION, as evidenced by the ? at the end of the sentence. It wasn't a statement of fact, nor did it ever pretend to be.
It was meant to open up mature, logical discussions on the future at AA/AE/AMR and what the new gates in the Eagle terminal may or may not mean.
But I should have known better than to attempt to throw a drop of optimism into the fires of pessimism that is APC. Business as usual...carry on.
Maybe he didn't realize that the original thread title was a QUESTION, as evidenced by the ? at the end of the sentence. It wasn't a statement of fact, nor did it ever pretend to be.
It was meant to open up mature, logical discussions on the future at AA/AE/AMR and what the new gates in the Eagle terminal may or may not mean.
But I should have known better than to attempt to throw a drop of optimism into the fires of pessimism that is APC. Business as usual...carry on.
Really.....
#72
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Except that 100 seat aircaft already operate at DFW. Furthermore the general future of the airport was not the point of this thread.
To clarify, those gates are being put into Eagle's terminal. It is not like DFW is preparing to receive 100 seat aircraft at a random corner. This is in terminal B which is Eagle's.
One way or another AMR has their hand in this. The fact that it is being installed in Eagle's backyard brings up that possibility...then again it could be for a possible codeshare.
Either way, it was those points which we could have discussed without the need for bickering, name calling, thread hijacks, or any of the other shenanigans.
To clarify, those gates are being put into Eagle's terminal. It is not like DFW is preparing to receive 100 seat aircraft at a random corner. This is in terminal B which is Eagle's.
One way or another AMR has their hand in this. The fact that it is being installed in Eagle's backyard brings up that possibility...then again it could be for a possible codeshare.
Either way, it was those points which we could have discussed without the need for bickering, name calling, thread hijacks, or any of the other shenanigans.
In order to GET those outside contracts, you have to have the infrastructure to offer attractive possibilities, otherwise it's that much harder to get your snout into the tent flap. The "spilling" of this tidbit also plays into the hope it will influence the percentage of saps at Eagle who plan to sell themsleves down the river for the hope of larger and shinier metal, for to actually realize that dream of flying larger aircraft for others, they'll be paid LESS then what they make now flying 37-50 seats by 2014.
Last edited by eaglefly; 11-07-2011 at 10:17 AM.
#73
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
The irony will be in 5-7 years when most of them come to the horrifying realization they wont be going to any majors due to the new proliferation of the new "RJ" and that tradional domestic mainline flying has that much more eroded from its existance and thus shrinks at the rate of retirements (or thereabouts) offering very few slots for this new breed of "regional pilots" to leave for.
I see basically history repeating itself on steroids wherby the former "regional pilots", become the future "small-jet pilots. "RJ's" will morph into "SJ's" and the new career for the majority (at least 75%) will be a lower-middle class income that approximates that of a typical Home Improvement Store manager.........well, at least captains.
Those who spend extnded time as F/O's in that environment spanning many years..............well, do we really need to go there ?
The career major airline pilot profession is in the mid-late stages of death and this next batch will finish it off. Right now, there is too much blindness from shiny metal, so most won't see this coming until well after it's over, just like 20 years ago when that first innocent little Comair CRJ-200 showed up and no one thought it would amount to much. That little plane is already HALF the domestic schedule overall and if mainline scope is lost, so will 2/3 of the remaining half, sentancing the majority of the future airline pilots of the U.S. to crap.
#74
Personal thoughts/opinions (ex-Eagle, current JB):
-9 gates at DFW is way more than JB could make use of
-The 190 at JB is being pulled from most routes ~800nm+ because of poor performance (DFW-BOS/JFK/FLL/MCO are all 800+)
-We have been hearing rumors of DFW service at JB, but that would most likely be a token amount of A320 DFW-BOS/JFK flights (2-3x daily each)
-APA would flip their lid if Eagle started flying E190s
Conclusion:
AMR/AA is setting up to eventually get 100seaters in AA colors, operated by APA pilots. JB has been trying to get rid of future E190 deliveries, so I wouldnt be surprised if they worked out a sweetheart deal with AA for those planes. Also dont forget this article is just describing some blueprints that are a very early stage of the planning process. The AA terminal in JFK was originally planned to have a huge wing that would be exclusively for Eagle. Needless to say that never happened and Eagle operates out of an afterthought of a jetbridge setup.
-9 gates at DFW is way more than JB could make use of
-The 190 at JB is being pulled from most routes ~800nm+ because of poor performance (DFW-BOS/JFK/FLL/MCO are all 800+)
-We have been hearing rumors of DFW service at JB, but that would most likely be a token amount of A320 DFW-BOS/JFK flights (2-3x daily each)
-APA would flip their lid if Eagle started flying E190s
Conclusion:
AMR/AA is setting up to eventually get 100seaters in AA colors, operated by APA pilots. JB has been trying to get rid of future E190 deliveries, so I wouldnt be surprised if they worked out a sweetheart deal with AA for those planes. Also dont forget this article is just describing some blueprints that are a very early stage of the planning process. The AA terminal in JFK was originally planned to have a huge wing that would be exclusively for Eagle. Needless to say that never happened and Eagle operates out of an afterthought of a jetbridge setup.
Last edited by Flyby1206; 11-07-2011 at 11:15 AM.
#75
Eagle's President has said that in order for the divested new company, formerly known as 'American Eagle', but soon to have a new name and only do business under the 'American Eagle' brand (owned by AMR) to survive, they will HAVE to be successful in obtaining outside flying feeding other carriers. It's not surprising they would position themselves to do that. Other carriers may want more access to DFW and if the new company (whatever it's called) has the gate space and can accomodate larger aircraft, that would be an integral component. That terminal may indeed have larger RJ's, but they have another legacies paint on them when they pull up to the gate. No guarantee's, but I think that is a primary idea.
In order to GET those outside contracts, you have to have the infrastructure to offer attractive possibilities, otherwise it's that much harder to get your snout into the tent flap. The "spilling" of this tidbit also plays into the hope it will influence the percentage of saps at Eagle who plan to sell themsleves down the river for the hope of larger and shinier metal, for to actually realize that dream of flying larger aircraft for others, they'll be paid LESS then what they make now flying 37-50 seats by 2014.
In order to GET those outside contracts, you have to have the infrastructure to offer attractive possibilities, otherwise it's that much harder to get your snout into the tent flap. The "spilling" of this tidbit also plays into the hope it will influence the percentage of saps at Eagle who plan to sell themsleves down the river for the hope of larger and shinier metal, for to actually realize that dream of flying larger aircraft for others, they'll be paid LESS then what they make now flying 37-50 seats by 2014.
#76
#78
Eagle's President has said that in order for the divested new company, formerly known as 'American Eagle', but soon to have a new name and only do business under the 'American Eagle' brand (owned by AMR) to survive, they will HAVE to be successful in obtaining outside flying feeding other carriers. It's not surprising they would position themselves to do that. Other carriers may want more access to DFW and if the new company (whatever it's called) has the gate space and can accomodate larger aircraft, that would be an integral component. That terminal may indeed have larger RJ's, but they have another legacies paint on them when they pull up to the gate. No guarantee's, but I think that is a primary idea.
In order to GET those outside contracts, you have to have the infrastructure to offer attractive possibilities, otherwise it's that much harder to get your snout into the tent flap. The "spilling" of this tidbit also plays into the hope it will influence the percentage of saps at Eagle who plan to sell themsleves down the river for the hope of larger and shinier metal, for to actually realize that dream of flying larger aircraft for others, they'll be paid LESS then what they make now flying 37-50 seats by 2014.
In order to GET those outside contracts, you have to have the infrastructure to offer attractive possibilities, otherwise it's that much harder to get your snout into the tent flap. The "spilling" of this tidbit also plays into the hope it will influence the percentage of saps at Eagle who plan to sell themsleves down the river for the hope of larger and shinier metal, for to actually realize that dream of flying larger aircraft for others, they'll be paid LESS then what they make now flying 37-50 seats by 2014.
Your response was, finally the kind I was hoping for since the beginning of this thread. Thank you for making a logical argument...except I disagree that there are so many "saps" at Eagle who would be influenced by E-190s.
Unlike 1997 we don't have multiple certificates being played against one another. Plus the widespread use of the internet these days has increased the amount of information out there to our pilots. I don't think this is something that AMR, the MEC, and others anticipated.
In regards to the possible arrival of 100 seat aircraft, there is a third possibility which I have been avoiding even mentioning. This could all be in preperation for a AA/Jetblue merger. I hope not...
#79
Reading and comprehension skills are basic requirements for pilots...you may want to re-evaluate your career choice.
Terminal D is being prepared for the A380. That is the international terminal in DFW. The terminal being equipped for 100 seat aircraft is...for the 1000000x time, EAGLE's terminal...or AMR's terminal, however you want to look at it...hence the point of this thread. Whatever is happening in terminal D or other parts of DFW has nothing to do with Eagle, AMR, or this discussion.
Terminal D is being prepared for the A380. That is the international terminal in DFW. The terminal being equipped for 100 seat aircraft is...for the 1000000x time, EAGLE's terminal...or AMR's terminal, however you want to look at it...hence the point of this thread. Whatever is happening in terminal D or other parts of DFW has nothing to do with Eagle, AMR, or this discussion.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
An AA merger with anybody is LETHAL to the AE pilot group.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



