Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
DFW / AA to get 100 seat jets??? (Wild Rumor) >

DFW / AA to get 100 seat jets??? (Wild Rumor)

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

DFW / AA to get 100 seat jets??? (Wild Rumor)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2011, 11:32 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
embraer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Default

What....speak very slowly. Or else Brewcity will think you are implying that Eagle is getting the A380. Maybe you could draw him a picture...
embraer is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:33 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
embraer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot View Post
An AA merger with anybody is LETHAL to the AE pilot group.
In more ways than one....
embraer is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:47 AM
  #83  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Default

Originally Posted by embraer View Post
What....speak very slowly. Or else Brewcity will think you are implying that Eagle is getting the A380. Maybe you could draw him a picture...
He was being sarcastic. The fact you cannot comprehend this speaks volumes about your personality and lets us all know that you will continue to be the gullible, hard headed person that no one can tell otherwise.

I'll end with this. Airports do construction. It's a fact, not some big conspiracy.
DENpilot is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:53 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
embraer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot View Post
He was being sarcastic. The fact you cannot comprehend this speaks volumes about your personality and lets us all know that you will continue to be the gullible, hard headed person that no one can tell otherwise.

I'll end with this. Airports do construction. It's a fact, not some big conspiracy.
He is a big boy...I'm sure he can speak for himself. Don't try to backpedal for him. He made a poor attempt at humor by taking a swipe at this discussion.

I'll end with this. AMR paid for the new gate construction in terminal B...not DFW airport. Now, back to your lair to try and come up with 3 reasons why it aint so...

What is your big beef with this anyway? My guess is Eagle rejected you and you have since been hoping for their downfall.
embraer is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:55 AM
  #85  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by embraer View Post
What....speak very slowly. Or else Brewcity will think you are implying that Eagle is getting the A380. Maybe you could draw him a picture...
I don't "usually' try to play games. People interpreted what you said as AE getting the 100 seaters. The B terminal belongs to the DFW Airport and it's leased to AE who is owned by AMR. Eagle currently does all the regional feed for AA out of DFW. As of today all of AA regional feed out of DFW is made out of RJs of 50 seats or less and 60+ Seat props. AMR will change their feed structure by decreasing the number of smaller aircraft and replacing them with larger equipment. Who will fly the equipment it's still being negotiated (SCOPE) but one thing is certain, whatever gates AMR will use for regional feed need to be able to accommodate the equipment and the B gates currently are not configured for that.
What is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:58 AM
  #86  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by embraer View Post
He is a big boy...I'm sure he can speak for himself. Don't try to backpedal for him. He made a poor attempt at humor by taking a swipe at this discussion.

I'll end with this. AMR paid for the new gate construction in terminal B...not DFW airport. Now, back to your lair to try and come up with 3 reasons why it aint so...

What is your big beef with this anyway? My guess is Eagle rejected you and you have since been hoping for their downfall.
If AMR pays for the terminal improvement they can increase their expenses, increase their losses, During contract negotiations this is an excellent move by management.
What is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:18 PM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Default

Originally Posted by embraer View Post

What is your big beef with this anyway? My guess is Eagle rejected you and you have since been hoping for their downfall.
My beef is people like you who have this hopeful attitude that larger jets will come to regional airlines. You said yourself you'd like to see the 190 at Eagle and fly it because its "a fantastic airplane." That attitude is partly why this industry is in the sh***er.

Then when we try to reason with you, you insist your crew room banter, chats with random construction workers and union reps are better sources of information than the years of experience I and others on this board have in this industry.

If Southwest went out and built a hangar big enough to accomodate a 777, by your logic Southwest would be flying widebodies next week.

I would bet you sigh everytime you taxi by a E190.

Oh and to answer your question, Eagle rejected me because I have an incident on my record. I hold no ill-will towards them even though if they had cared to look at it, they may have hired me because of it, like XJT did.
DENpilot is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:43 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
embraer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot View Post
My beef is people like you who have this hopeful attitude that larger jets will come to regional airlines. You said yourself you'd like to see the 190 at Eagle and fly it because its "a fantastic airplane." That attitude is partly why this industry is in the sh***er.

Then when we try to reason with you, you insist your crew room banter, chats with random construction workers and union reps are better sources of information than the years of experience I and others on this board have in this industry.

If Southwest went out and built a hangar big enough to accomodate a 777, by your logic Southwest would be flying widebodies next week.

I would bet you sigh everytime you taxi by a E190.

Oh and to answer your question, Eagle rejected me because I have an incident on my record. I hold no ill-will towards them even though if they had cared to look at it, they may have hired me because of it, like XJT did.
Nice try. Yes, I would love to have the opportunity to fly a E-190. Just like millions of pilots would like to fly a 777, A380, etc... Its called having a passion for aviation. Remember what that felt like?

I never said I would fly anything for our current wages.. Which is part of the reason I'm a NO vote on our current TA. For all that is wrong with our industry, including pay, pilot's passions and love for what they do is not one of them.

I knew something went wrong between you and Eagle. Your bitterness seeps through every post of yours. Sorry it didn't work out.. But its time you moved on.
embraer is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:51 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by What View Post
Do you really think that AMR wants Eagle to grow, that this divestiture is about growing a regional airlines, while the stage is set to shrink them. Why would AMR allow Eagle to grow in DFW for other carriers, bring competition to their house. Right now it's safe to say that regionals won't be buying any new 50 seat RJ due to (fuel cost as well as pilot wages). The regional pilot wages are as low as they will be in part due the lack of a surplus of pilots. Right now there isn't a surplus like years past so the major carriers can't move the flying around as efficiently.
What ?

"Eagle" may or may not grow depending on scope changes. The CURRENT "Eagle" will shrink in the amount of flying they do for AA due to whipsawing, but MAY make that up with outside flying, but the road ahead for that is extremely dicey. THAT is why the TA has 4,332 exit/escape clauses (an exaggeration) for AMR. If the TA passes, the regional pilot wages will drop dramatically as the market for "how low can you go" regional pilot pay-wise will open.......and we all know fresh young pilots already at one regional will migrate at the drop of a hat for promises of shiny metal, fast upgrades or flowthrough's to mainline partners, REGARDLESS OF PAY........been doing it for years, my friend. As far as bringing in newhires, yes that IS likely to dramatically drop off, but that WILL NOT result in $40-50K/year RJ newhire wages. Instead, that market will shrink and likely the 100-125-seat range will fill the gap as the smaller RJ's disappear. I don't see too many of Eagle's 500 plus newhires leaving the industry because of the 25-30K they make now. In fact, Eagle is littered with pilots staying at Eagle for 10 years at feeble pay, ''waiting for their chance". It's always been a suckers game and let's face it, pilots are NOTORIOUS for being suckers.


Originally Posted by What View Post
We know that the pilots at the majors won't let SCOPE get any worse than it is.
We know no such thing. Anyone who thinks this is a certainty is deluding themselves.

Originally Posted by what View Post
Large RJ are not as profitable as an Airbus 319.
Gee..............ya think ?

I'll file that in my "hot flash of the week" folder.

Originally Posted by what View Post
With the current pilot wages at the regionals and the fuel prices it's more economical to fly an Airbus 319 than 2 CRJ 700, if you think I am wrong how come RAH got E190 for sale and jet blue decided not exercise offers and return aircraft to the lease company.
I think you're exactly correct, but if you had read any number of my posts over time, you'd have saved yourself most of this post.


Originally Posted by what View Post
JetBlue is growing but it won't be RJ it will be Airbus A320 family aircraft. AA will do the same, Eagle flying shifted to the Airbus aircraft they will get. Everyone says Eagle has signed all these lease extensions, don't forget AMR controls Eagle and can just take this gates under their name. The management at Eagle are Employees of AMR, they will do what's best for AMR. United, Delta and everyone else knows this. It's all a pony show for the SEC.
Thanks for the lecture of the OBVIOUS in regards to Jet Blue. As for the lecture in regards to Eagle, I'll rely on my nearly two and a half DECADES at Eagle to tell me what you think I'm oblivious to. Yes, it is very possible this is a sham meant only to get a crap TA passed, but the final chapter of what is the current Eagle has yet to be written.

Just how long HAVE you been at Eagle anyway ?

Last edited by eaglefly; 11-07-2011 at 01:18 PM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 02:39 PM
  #90  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Thanks for the lecture of the OBVIOUS in regards to Jet Blue. As for the lecture in regards to Eagle, I'll rely on my nearly two and a half DECADES at Eagle to tell me what you think I'm oblivious to.Yes, it is very possible this is a sham meant only to get a crap TA passed, but the final chapter of what is the current Eagle has yet to be written.
This divestiture isn't about passing the TA, it's about bringing the cost at Eagle down. If they are able to lower cost and generate movement from the senior pilots to AA there is no reason to seek other regional airline for feed by AA. It's all about cost. The flow is there divested or not. They are trying to take your QOL and Pay to force to move else where. And if you don't go they will bring your pay down to what they would pay someone else. In other words they want you to fly for them but they are not going to pay you 6 figures to fly an RJ. You can stay at Eagle for less or move on to bigger and better things. That is what is happening here.

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Just how long HAVE you been at Eagle anyway ?
I've been here for a year, and I have much to learn.


Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Eagle's President has said that in order for the divested new company, formerly known as 'American Eagle', but soon to have a new name and only do business under the 'American Eagle' brand (owned by AMR) to survive, they will HAVE to be successful in obtaining outside flying feeding other carriers. It's not surprising they would position themselves to do that. Other carriers may want more access to DFW and if the new company (whatever it's called) has the gate space and can accomodate larger aircraft, that would be an integral component. That terminal may indeed have larger RJ's, but they have another legacies paint on them when they pull up to the gate. No guarantee's, but I think that is a primary idea.
AMR management controls Eagle, Right now Eagle is possibly being divested with an AMR infrastructure. Why would any other airline want to do business with "AMR" I mean the new Eagle that is run by AMR. Also, what are we going to do, buy the airplanes that RAH is selling because they can't fly them for profit under Frontier and can't get a dancing partner for them, better yet, lease RJs from AMR and fly them for Delta and United. Ohh you are referring to then stealing the CRJ from other carriers, I get it we are going to enter the whipsaw game with carriers who have less of a longevity than we do. AMR is building trying to build fortress (the cornerstone plan they have) why in the hell would they allow Eagle to bring in competition. At that point Eagle becomes a direct competitor. We have slots and gates but for one minute don't think AMR will let Eagle use those against them. You want to fly a Delta or United airplane see you in terminal E. I might be new here but understand business a little better than you Sir.


Originally Posted by RJ Pilot View Post
Why would I? My 100K+ a yr flying a LIL RJ, makes it tough!
You are absolutely correct, your 100,000 a year makes it though for us to compete in the market. I am not against the senior pilots at Eagle. Most of you had other plans but with the way things have gone in the industry Eagle is the best fit for you.
What is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jelloy683
Regional
13
08-14-2007 02:54 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
Lbell911
Regional
10
07-06-2007 03:17 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM
ryane946
Regional
41
07-21-2006 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices