Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Age 67 Rule...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2023 | 07:19 AM
  #101  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,950
Likes: 110
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Be interesting to see how many regionals fold by then.
This is not a bad thing. Return mainline flying to the mainline. Commuters can go back to flying 19-30 seat turboprops between Altoona and Pittsburgh.
Reply
Old 03-15-2023 | 07:35 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by mcdonald
With Republicans now controlling the house, why hasn't this bill come up for a vote?
Because it has no support even with the republicans.
Reply
Old 03-15-2023 | 11:28 AM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Because it has no support even with the republicans.
Really? Wasn't changing it from 60>65 generally accepted as being a positive change for companies, workers, and consumers alike?
Reply
Old 03-15-2023 | 12:15 PM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 590
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by mcdonald
Really? Wasn't changing it from 60>65 generally accepted as being a positive change for companies, workers, and consumers alike?
Ask those whose careers were stagnated due to age 65 as it being beneficial to workers…..
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 03:34 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by mcdonald
Really? Wasn't changing it from 60>65 generally accepted as being a positive change for companies, workers, and consumers alike?
No, ICAO changed their age to 65. The FAA had agreements that meant they had to let those pilots fly in the US. There were multiple lawsuits over age 60 in court at that time. The FAA had beat those in years past as a safety issue which is the only reason you can discriminate for age. Hard to argue in court at that point that foreign pilots were safe to 65 and US pilots were not. Everyone except a bunch of airline pilots knew age 60 was done so legislation was quickly crafted to raise the age to 65 before a judge did it in court and possibly eliminated any age restrictions and or made it retroactive.
Other than a few pilots no one wants the age raised again including airline managements. The disability costs to the airlines would be enormous.
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 06:00 AM
  #106  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,126
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Not much of anything is going to come up for a vote because everything is on razor thin margins...... gridlock thankfully.

Sometimes a dysfunctional government isn't a bad thing...
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 06:07 AM
  #107  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,247
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Sometimes a dysfunctional government isn't a bad thing...
Not if the dysfunction is Congress ceding power to unelected bureaucrats so they can dodge the accountability they are supposed to have for making the laws that govern us. That’s just cowardice and careerism.
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 11:07 AM
  #108  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Sometimes a dysfunctional government isn't a bad thing...
Investment managers have shown me divided government, gridlock, is good for the stock market. Neither party can pass extreme legislation. It must be more middle of the road legislation. That is good for the economy.
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 02:22 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Be interesting to see how many regionals fold by then.
hopefully all of them.
Reply
Old 03-16-2023 | 07:03 PM
  #110  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
No, ICAO changed their age to 65. The FAA had agreements that meant they had to let those pilots fly in the US. There were multiple lawsuits over age 60 in court at that time. The FAA had beat those in years past as a safety issue which is the only reason you can discriminate for age. Hard to argue in court at that point that foreign pilots were safe to 65 and US pilots were not. Everyone except a bunch of airline pilots knew age 60 was done so legislation was quickly crafted to raise the age to 65 before a judge did it in court and possibly eliminated any age restrictions and or made it retroactive.
Other than a few pilots no one wants the age raised again including airline managements. The disability costs to the airlines would be enormous.
Interesting. Is there any chatter about ICAO raising again? Or are they not having the same challenges across the pond that we are?

I had concluded that while this would only be kicking the can down the road, it would slow things down for a bit which would help stabilize the regionals--and management would want that. I am also surprised the longest tenured pilots wouldn't want the option to keep going for a couple more years given the money they would make.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices