Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Biannual Upgrade Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2012 | 02:08 PM
  #31  
Farmlover's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Default

At pinnacle upgrades are 2010 hires!!! Oh wait i am a 4.5 yr Fo and get to watch colgan upgrade after 1yr. How fun!!!!
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 06:57 AM
  #32  
rightside02's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 6
From: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Default

At pinnacle upgrades are 2010 hires!!! Oh wait i am a 4.5 yr Fo and get to watch colgan upgrade after 1yr. How fun!!!!
Sad but true....... No dis to the 9L pilots . But this turned out pretty bad....... And now were loosing money .......
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 07:58 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

You think that's bad now? Just wait until the Saabs are parked. All those 2007 and up to Feb 2008 Saab Captains are senior to 2007 and quite a few 2006 Pinnacle CRJ Captains. They will displace into jets as long as their seniority is above the most junior guy in that base and seat. If the Saabs are parked, and that's actually a very likely scenario, then Pinnacle could displace all its Captains out to the bare minimum 541 on the CRJ-200 as required by the quota. This would take upgrades at 9E back to a class date of Aug 2006.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 09:29 AM
  #34  
rightside02's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 6
From: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Default

You think that's bad now? Just wait until the Saabs are parked. All those 2007 and up to Feb 2008 Saab Captains are senior to 2007 and quite a few 2006 Pinnacle CRJ Captains. They will displace into jets as long as their seniority is above the most junior guy in that base and seat. If the Saabs are parked, and that's actually a very likely scenario, then Pinnacle could displace all its Captains out to the bare minimum 541 on the CRJ-200 as required by the quota. This would take upgrades at 9E back to a class date of Aug 2006.

Your point is greatly valid, but those training cost would never happen..... That foolish to retrain 500 people
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 11:22 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by rightside02
Your point is greatly valid, but those training cost would never happen..... That foolish to retrain 500 people
Contract requires it. Unless the union voluntarily gives concessions, or if company files BK and files motion 1113e that the retraining costs would liquidate the company. Only option then would be to downgrade and furlough out of seniority the Colgan Saab pilots.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 01:31 PM
  #36  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Sad, we are still so divided as a pilot group. Anger over a pilot group regarding a decision made by a neutral 3rd party who was appointed by all 3 groups.

When do we move past that and concentrate on the true issue, the company and their financial doom and gloom.

If we are divided, we dont stand a chance.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 03:34 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
Sad, we are still so divided as a pilot group. Anger over a pilot group regarding a decision made by a neutral 3rd party who was appointed by all 3 groups.

When do we move past that and concentrate on the true issue, the company and their financial doom and gloom.

If we are divided, we dont stand a chance.
Only partially correct. The 3 representing the 9E side totally failed at their jobs and backstabbed every single Colgan pilot, and in turn, Pinnacle pilots too.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:01 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
Sad, we are still so divided as a pilot group. Anger over a pilot group regarding a decision made by a neutral 3rd party who was appointed by all 3 groups.

When do we move past that and concentrate on the true issue, the company and their financial doom and gloom.

If we are divided, we dont stand a chance.
Stand a chance against what? In the scenario at hand I don't think it matters much. We are powerless, it is out of our hands. A united pilot group can do nothing to stop the storm on the horizon.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:14 PM
  #39  
Farmlover's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
Sad, we are still so divided as a pilot group. Anger over a pilot group regarding a decision made by a neutral 3rd party who was appointed by all 3 groups.

When do we move past that and concentrate on the true issue, the company and their financial doom and gloom.

If we are divided, we dont stand a chance.
You must be a colgan guy.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:18 PM
  #40  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jayray2
Stand a chance against what? In the scenario at hand I don't think it matters much. We are powerless, it is out of our hands. A united pilot group can do nothing to stop the storm on the horizon.
Basically I am saying that life will not be getting any easier for many of the 3,000 pilots here at Pinnacle. We will have enough upcoming stress at this company, we dont need any more by revisiting the SLI decision of the past.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Regional
8
06-30-2011 04:40 PM
schone
Regional
30
03-24-2010 07:06 AM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
shimmydamp
Regional
1
09-05-2008 10:09 PM
ERJ135
Regional
4
10-31-2005 07:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices