![]() |
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 1244427)
How about when Delta landed on the taxiway in ATL or NW overshot their destination you can point fingers all you want....
|
Originally Posted by lolwut
(Post 1244236)
Gulfstream enables pilots who wouldn't be able to otherwise cut it to buy their way into an airline job. Getting to 1500TT and successfully interviewing is tough and a lot of people can't do it.
It isn't anything to do with Gulfstream's training itself, its that it (and other places like it) allow those on the lower end of the scale to slip through the cracks and become qualified enough to get into an airliner. Not to say there aren't some exceptional pilots that came through Gulfstream, but it also enables those without the natural skill/ability/drive/etc to become a successful airline pilot the chance at being one anyways. |
I think hr5900 is good for the industry but why haven't they put out a grandfather clause yet? Seems like none of regionals know what they are gonna do with hiring.
|
In the late 1960's, airlines were hiring low time, zero time guys to fly complex jet aircraft. It was the dawn of the jet age and there was a pilot shortage. The difference between then and recent history is these individuals were mentored by experienced pilots from the "High and the Mighty" generation. Guys with experience flying NDBs as high tech equipment. Currently we don't have that mentoring capacity. Furloughing at the majors brought on by RJ advancement at the regionals has created an experience gap. Fresh new captains with no real life experience paired with fo's from pilot mills has been and continues to be the norm. Very different times indeed.
Low time new hires is not the entire problem. It has worked in the past. The combined experience of the cockpit is what is important. The airlines need to cherish longevity, and experience. It creates an environment of education and stability. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1244436)
Got it. You never want to work at Delta.
|
Originally Posted by SnoJet440
(Post 1244494)
In the late 1960's, airlines were hiring low time, zero time guys to fly complex jet aircraft. It was the dawn of the jet age and there was a pilot shortage. The difference between then and recent history is these individuals were mentored by experienced pilots from the "High and the Mighty" generation. Guys with experience flying NDBs as high tech equipment. Currently we don't have that mentoring capacity. Furloughing at the majors brought on by RJ advancement at the regionals has created an experience gap. Fresh new captains with no real life experience paired with fo's from pilot mills has been and continues to be the norm. Very different times indeed.
Low time new hires is not the entire problem. It has worked in the past. The combined experience of the cockpit is what is important. The airlines need to cherish longevity, and experience. It creates an environment of education and stability. |
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 1244427)
How about when Delta landed on the taxiway in ATL or NW overshot their destination you can point fingers all you want....
|
Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
(Post 1244512)
Did they, or did they not land at the correct destination though?
|
Originally Posted by SiShane
(Post 1244493)
I think hr5900 is good for the industry but why haven't they put out a grandfather clause yet? Seems like none of regionals know what they are gonna do with hiring.
|
Originally Posted by coryk
(Post 1244517)
Ummm, on a taxiway at the world's busiest airport. :eek:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands