Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

EGL CA flew to age 69?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2012 | 06:03 PM
  #21  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Be careful what you say... you never know when you might have to eat your words. You/we really don't know his story, and as such, probably have no grounds by whih to judge this guy. The FAA, on the other hand, is a completely different story.
Not really. If he lied so he could fly past the mandatory retirement age, he's exactly what I called him. If he is proven innocent, then he isn't.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 06:27 PM
  #22  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Be careful what you say... you never know when you might have to eat your words. You/we really don't know his story, and as such, probably have no grounds by whih to judge this guy. The FAA, on the other hand, is a completely different story.
If what the allegations they say are true, johnso is spot on.

You are correct that the FAA is hardly a fair judge and jury.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 07:00 PM
  #23  
willflyforcash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Default

I know his story. And as much as I liked him, it cost an upgrade and degraded QOL for anyone junior to him and that sucks. He was quite the character to fly with though.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 07:01 PM
  #24  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Not really. If he lied so he could fly past the mandatory retirement age, he's exactly what I called him. If he is proven innocent, then he isn't.
Semantics, but he is to be proven guilty. Then you'd be right.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 07:48 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by atooraya
[subtle 64 year old pilot post]

Nope. In my mid 40s. Nice try though.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 08:00 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle
Get a clue. It is not the only industry which requires mandatory retirement at a certain age. Some examples off the top of my head: FBI and other federal agents (57), ATC controllers (56- with certain exceptions), some states Supreme Court Justices, Federsl Psrk Rangers, etc. etc....

But the requirement aside, I'd rather not be flying on a plane with an 80 year old pilot, even if he/she was healthy and sound of mind. I don't want to share the roads with them, let alone the skies.
You need to get a clue. Mandatory retirement for pilots has had much more to do with getting rid of senior pilots at the top of the pay scale than it ever did with safety. I'd rather fly with Hoot Gibson any day than some of these cheesesteak eating goobers in their mid 30s and 40s that are overweight, big as a house and one step from a coronary. Whether you can fly should have more to do with how well you take care of yourself and perform on flight checks than an arbitrary limit. The examples you cited are an agency or company placing limits on its employees, not an industry wide limit. And more and more of these are falling due to age discrimination lawsuits. Comparing what an FBI agent does to what we do in the cockpit is very different. Last time I checked there were some Supreme court judges will into their 80s, so I don't know what you are talking about. All the judges where I live are pretty old, and they keep forcing them out of retirement to cover for younger Judges for whatever reason.

The only business of the FAA is how I perform on flight checks and my flight physical. Anything else is none of their business. When you give a government agency an inch, they'll try and take a mile. Just look at the TSA.
Reply
Old 10-06-2012 | 11:41 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 2
From: B757F CA
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
You need to get a clue. Mandatory retirement for pilots has had much more to do with getting rid of senior pilots at the top of the pay scale than it ever did with safety. I'd rather fly with Hoot Gibson any day than some of these cheesesteak eating goobers in their mid 30s and 40s that are overweight, big as a house and one step from a coronary. Whether you can fly should have more to do with how well you take care of yourself and perform on flight checks than an arbitrary limit. The examples you cited are an agency or company placing limits on its employees, not an industry wide limit. And more and more of these are falling due to age discrimination lawsuits. Comparing what an FBI agent does to what we do in the cockpit is very different. Last time I checked there were some Supreme court judges will into their 80s, so I don't know what you are talking about. All the judges where I live are pretty old, and they keep forcing them out of retirement to cover for younger Judges for whatever reason.

The only business of the FAA is how I perform on flight checks and my flight physical. Anything else is none of their business. When you give a government agency an inch, they'll try and take a mile. Just look at the TSA.
Nice try. Obviously FBI agents do a different job than we do. But if I want to be one, I am forced out at 57. So in that sense, it is exactly the same. An arbitrary retirement age is an arbitrary retirement age. As for Justices, I said "some state" Supreme Court Justices, and I know that in Florida, they are forced out at a certain age (I think 70). Your notion of airline pilots being the only professionals that are forced out because of age is ignorant. Period. Whether you agree or disagree with that policy is another matter.

And you decry the injustice of being forced to retire because of age discrimination, yet argue that a guy who FALSIFIES documents should be lauded? Yeah...

And while I have no problem with senior citizens, I'll let you fly with the 70+ crowd on a gusty, nasty, winter day, where good hand-eye coordination, and good reaction time, is important.

Last edited by IQuitEagle; 10-06-2012 at 11:59 PM.
Reply
Old 10-07-2012 | 06:07 AM
  #28  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
Semantics, but he is to be proven guilty. Then you'd be right.
I'll agree with that. Uh oh! Phuz and I agree on something!!! Maybe the Mayans are correct!!!
Reply
Old 10-07-2012 | 07:14 AM
  #29  
The Chow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
From: 1st year pay for the 3rd time
Default

I couldn't agree more the mandatory retirement for 121 is and was a crock. It was born under the era of the CAA so that senior captains couldn't bid the jet originally.

Regardless, this pilot broke the rules. Quite frankly I'm sick of this whole notion that the rules apply to everyone but me. Having flown with I can also say he broke more than his fair share of the rules and regs. Despite all of that I like the guy. But when you get caught regardless of the oh so good intentions, face the it like a man or don't commit the crime.




Originally Posted by FlyingKat
You need to get a clue. Mandatory retirement for pilots has had much more to do with getting rid of senior pilots at the top of the pay scale than it ever did with safety. I'd rather fly with Hoot Gibson any day than some of these cheesesteak eating goobers in their mid 30s and 40s that are overweight, big as a house and one step from a coronary. Whether you can fly should have more to do with how well you take care of yourself and perform on flight checks than an arbitrary limit. The examples you cited are an agency or company placing limits on its employees, not an industry wide limit. And more and more of these are falling due to age discrimination lawsuits. Comparing what an FBI agent does to what we do in the cockpit is very different. Last time I checked there were some Supreme court judges will into their 80s, so I don't know what you are talking about. All the judges where I live are pretty old, and they keep forcing them out of retirement to cover for younger Judges for whatever reason.

The only business of the FAA is how I perform on flight checks and my flight physical. Anything else is none of their business. When you give a government agency an inch, they'll try and take a mile. Just look at the TSA.
Reply
Old 10-07-2012 | 11:39 AM
  #30  
willflyforcash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle
Nice try. Obviously FBI agents do a different job than we do. But if I want to be one, I am forced out at 57. So in that sense, it is exactly the same. An arbitrary retirement age is an arbitrary retirement age. As for Justices, I said "some state" Supreme Court Justices, and I know that in Florida, they are forced out at a certain age (I think 70). Your notion of airline pilots being the only professionals that are forced out because of age is ignorant. Period. Whether you agree or disagree with that policy is another matter.

And you decry the injustice of being forced to retire because of age discrimination, yet argue that a guy who FALSIFIES documents should be lauded? Yeah...

And while I have no problem with senior citizens, I'll let you fly with the 70+ crowd on a gusty, nasty, winter day, where good hand-eye coordination, and good reaction time, is important.
+100 Well said.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
duvie
Major
0
01-30-2007 12:20 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices