Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

G7 growing again?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2012 | 11:52 AM
  #71  
MunkyButtr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ross9238
Is that all regionals or just a particular few? If you are saying all regionals, then what is the alternative that you suggest to get to mainline other than military?
Does it have to be legal?
Old 10-20-2012 | 12:32 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickt86
If you look at the thread by that analyst lady you actually see that at almost all the majors, the feed provided is broken down into a common setup. One or two 'better' regional's such as Skywest/XJET/PNCL/Eagle do the VAST majority of the feed, typically 60%+, sometimes over 80%. Then the remaining feed is broken down in small amounts to one or two crud product RJ airlines such as CHQ or TSH/GJET. Its clear their product is not something the mainlines want representing the express/connection/eagle brand, but they do want them there to whipsaw and keep the others in line. I dont think you will see GOJET become the main provider anywhere for that reason, and they may soon be approaching the end of their growth as they are maxing out on what they can do. Not to mention soon those pesky employees are going to start asking for something at least equal to EVERY OTHER RJ airline.
Keep thing that any regional has a better product. PNCL/eagle/Asa/ whoever is no better
Old 10-20-2012 | 12:44 PM
  #73  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,203
Likes: 269
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon:1280029
Originally Posted by rickt86
If you look at the thread by that analyst lady you actually see that at almost all the majors, the feed provided is broken down into a common setup. One or two 'better' regional's such as Skywest/XJET/PNCL/Eagle do the VAST majority of the feed, typically 60%+, sometimes over 80%. Then the remaining feed is broken down in small amounts to one or two crud product RJ airlines such as CHQ or TSH/GJET. Its clear their product is not something the mainlines want representing the express/connection/eagle brand, but they do want them there to whipsaw and keep the others in line. I dont think you will see GOJET become the main provider anywhere for that reason, and they may soon be approaching the end of their growth as they are maxing out on what they can do. Not to mention soon those pesky employees are going to start asking for something at least equal to EVERY OTHER RJ airline.
Keep thing that any regional has a better product. PNCL/eagle/Asa/ whoever is no better
yes there are regionals that are better
Old 10-20-2012 | 01:15 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
yes there are regionals that are better
Yes but bigger doesnt mean better... Rickt seems to think so though.
Old 10-20-2012 | 02:57 PM
  #75  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,203
Likes: 269
Default

Originally Posted by Fly782:1280048
Originally Posted by Trip7
yes there are regionals that are better
Yes but bigger doesnt mean better... Rickt seems to think so though.
Bigger doesn't mean better(Mesa), but it seems higher quality, more expensive regionals, are given a larger share of regional feed by mainline partners.

AMR has an RFP out for 255 large regional jets. Just a rumor, but I've heard AMR is not even considering TSA Holdings due to past American Connection issues with TSA
Old 10-20-2012 | 03:54 PM
  #76  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Bigger doesn't mean better(Mesa), but it seems higher quality, more expensive regionals, are given a larger share of regional feed by mainline partners.
For example, Comair has 60% of Delta's regional flying.

Oops, I meant they had 60%. I wonder if "more expensive" is why that percentage changed.
Old 10-20-2012 | 05:57 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
yes there are regionals that are better
Oh silly misguided arrogance
Old 10-20-2012 | 05:58 PM
  #78  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,203
Likes: 269
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer:1280106
Originally Posted by Trip7
Bigger doesn't mean better(Mesa), but it seems higher quality, more expensive regionals, are given a larger share of regional feed by mainline partners.
For example, Comair has 60% of Delta's regional flying.

Oops, I meant they had 60%. I wonder if "more expensive" is why that percentage changed.
Comair had unfortunate problem of being wholly owned. DAL is not a regional airline specialist. Comair was an after thought. Comair couldn't expand their flying outside the Delta Connection portfolio. Their unit costs must have skyrocketed to an unreasonable level

Comair is one end of the spectrum, Mesa is the other end. A regional finding the right cost balance while maintaining a decent quality operation will be best positioned to succeed.
Old 10-20-2012 | 07:43 PM
  #79  
TBucket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
B
AMR has an RFP out for 255 large regional jets. Just a rumor, but I've heard AMR is not even considering TSA Holdings due to past American Connection issues with TSA

Nevermind that TSA can't staff the, what, 18 airplanes it currently has? 255 is LAUGHABLE for the size that even all of TSH is.
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:06 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Bigger doesn't mean better(Mesa), but it seems higher quality, more expensive regionals, are given a larger share of regional feed by mainline partners.

AMR has an RFP out for 255 large regional jets. Just a rumor, but I've heard AMR is not even considering TSA Holdings due to past American Connection issues with TSA
Well I've heard opposite, so who is bigger?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Money Talk
12
08-26-2008 01:49 PM
vagabond
Military
0
04-04-2008 10:02 PM
MikeB525
Major
6
07-04-2007 09:34 PM
Window_Seat
Regional
3
02-08-2007 01:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices