Airline pilot shortage coverage on NPR
#21
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Commercial
I made $26,000 my 1st year at a regional and that was back in 1997. Don't 2nd year FO's at most regionals make close to $40 at most regionals these days? Not saying it shouldn't be more but for a job not requiring a degree good luck making $40,000 if you are 20 years old and have no degree. If you wasted $150K at UND or ERAU than that is your own fault. There are much cheaper ways to do it.
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc....997&year2=2012
Last edited by soar2live; 12-27-2012 at 09:40 AM.
#22
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
With regards to your "good luck without a degree", explain to me what the purpose of a degree is? I all about education, have a four year degree and seeking a graduate degree but don't call someone who persues aviation training uneducated. These individuals have education and training in their field. One must spend hundreds of hours learning about different aspects of aviation and must pass exams as well as evaluations. Education is not just sitting in a class at a college. We live in a supply and deman economy, currently the pilot skill set is increasing in demand compared to the last decade and airlines will have increase compensation to attract new candidates lobby law makers into reducing restrictions to increase the candidate pool. But make no mistake, a pilot is an educated professional!
This is ludicrous. You sir, are absolutely incorrect.
Aviation training is 99% "vocational", and perhaps 1% "educational". The only part that might be considered educational is some aspects of CRM.
Vocational training is narrowly focused on specific skills that apply to a trade (like welding or plumbing). A pilot solves most problems by running checklists.
Education is specifically broadly focused to widen your base of knowledge, especially providing an appreciation and understanding of the past, and different cultures in the hopes of providing a sound basis for future judgement and decision making. Equally important, education develops problem solving skills involving critical thought and analysis (vice running checklists and memory items). Skill-intensive majors such as engineering, medicine, and computer science clearly require a lot of technical knowledge, but the actual application of that knowledge requires analytical skills which are developed in both core and major-specific coursework.
Now there is certainly a place for the application of analytical and even critical thinking skills in aviation, primarily when dealing with other people (crew, ATC, ground services, mx, etc). But flight training is very far from educational, so hopefully you picked those skills up somewhere else along the way.
Do you "need" education to be a pilot? In absolute terms, no. Do you need a degree to progress in the industry in the US? Most likely, yes.
But aviation training or operations is not education. And everything I said applies to a real education from a university, not online diploma mills.
#25
This is ludicrous. You sir, are absolutely incorrect.
Aviation training is 99% "vocational", and perhaps 1% "educational". The only part that might be considered educational is some aspects of CRM.
Vocational training is narrowly focused on specific skills that apply to a trade (like welding or plumbing). A pilot solves most problems by running checklists.
Education is specifically broadly focused to widen your base of knowledge, especially providing an appreciation and understanding of the past, and different cultures in the hopes of providing a sound basis for future judgement and decision making. Equally important, education develops problem solving skills involving critical thought and analysis (vice running checklists and memory items). Skill-intensive majors such as engineering, medicine, and computer science clearly require a lot of technical knowledge, but the actual application of that knowledge requires analytical skills.
Now there is certainly a place for the application of analytical and even critical thinking skills in aviation, primarily when dealing with other people (crew, ATC, ground services, mx, etc). But flight training is very far from educational, so hopefully you picked those skills up somewhere else along the way.
Do you "need" education to be a pilot? In absolute terms, no. Do you need a degree to progress in the industry in the US? Most likely, yes.
But aviation training or operations is not education.
Aviation training is 99% "vocational", and perhaps 1% "educational". The only part that might be considered educational is some aspects of CRM.
Vocational training is narrowly focused on specific skills that apply to a trade (like welding or plumbing). A pilot solves most problems by running checklists.
Education is specifically broadly focused to widen your base of knowledge, especially providing an appreciation and understanding of the past, and different cultures in the hopes of providing a sound basis for future judgement and decision making. Equally important, education develops problem solving skills involving critical thought and analysis (vice running checklists and memory items). Skill-intensive majors such as engineering, medicine, and computer science clearly require a lot of technical knowledge, but the actual application of that knowledge requires analytical skills.
Now there is certainly a place for the application of analytical and even critical thinking skills in aviation, primarily when dealing with other people (crew, ATC, ground services, mx, etc). But flight training is very far from educational, so hopefully you picked those skills up somewhere else along the way.
Do you "need" education to be a pilot? In absolute terms, no. Do you need a degree to progress in the industry in the US? Most likely, yes.
But aviation training or operations is not education.
"Education in its general sense is a form of learning in which knowledge, skills, and habits of a group of people are transferred from one generation to the next through teaching, training, research, or simply through autodidacticism.[1] Generally, it occurs through any experience that has a formative effect on the way one thinks, feels, or acts."
Education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"ed·u·ca·tion
1. the act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life.
2. the act or process of imparting or acquiring particular knowledge or skills, as for a profession.
3.a degree, level, or kind of schooling: a university education.
4.the result produced by instruction, training, or study: to show one's education.
5.the science or art of teaching; pedagogics.
Education | Define Education at Dictionary.com
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Commercial
Education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
please tell me you didn't list Wikipedia as a source on purpose to back up a definition on education...
please tell me you didn't list Wikipedia as a source on purpose to back up a definition on education...
#27
I am willing to bet that the people with a degree will argue that it is necessary to be sucessful in this industry, and the people that don't, won't.
This guy has it nailed. (In my opinion.)
Is a college degree worth the cost? You decide. - YouTube
This guy has it nailed. (In my opinion.)
Is a college degree worth the cost? You decide. - YouTube
#28
Education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
please tell me you didn't list Wikipedia as a source on purpose to back up a definition on education...
please tell me you didn't list Wikipedia as a source on purpose to back up a definition on education...

#29
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Learning systems is NOT education. Learning how to DESIGN and BUILD systems would require extensive analytical thought, and thus is education. Even learning how to model systems mathematically would be educational as it would provide a robust understanding of how they work.
I taught at 141 and 161 schools and although I'm actually very knowledgeable in thermodynamics, that subject never once came up.
Bottom line: people talking about education and aviation always come back to the systems. But the majority of pilots I meet do not even understand the difference between AC and DC electricity. They just memorize single-line diagrams and could not begin to draw a simple DC timer circuit, much less do the calculus needed for AC circuits.
Very few pilots (unless they are engineers) understand basic thermodynamics at all, or could even produce a simple graph or equation depicting heat transfer across layers a different materials.
Most pilots when asked about bernouli's principle will draw a cartoon flow restriction, and have never seen the full equation describing the various components of energy in a fluid flow.
Admittedly, pilots have more in-depth technical knowledge about a wider variety of disciplines than the average tradesman, but that does not make their knowledge and training "education". Pilots have some unusual and challenging aspects of their profession (hand eye coordination, multi-tasking, calm under pressure, etc) which are noteworthy and set them apart from the average person, but again have nothing to do with education.
Flight training as education is laughable, and it's almost pathetic to watch people try to rationalize their background into something it's not. Now a university flight training program could incorporate some education into the non-aviation core curriculum, and presumably have to do so for certification purposes. But a CPL/CFI from ATP flight school, MAPD, etc ain't education...
Somebody once pointed out to me that pilots are "the dumbest of the smart people"...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



