Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CRJ-700's for Pinnacle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2013 | 07:43 AM
  #31  
Jamers's Avatar
Gets Off to Weekends
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Ultralight
Some good points here. If a IBEW electrcian gets laid off the union finds them other work at the same pay. Why can't ALPA do that? Why does a senior captain with several type ratings and thousands of hours of airline experience have to start at the bottom of the pile on year one F.O. pay if they switch carriers? Its the most unfair messed up system.
Honestly I would be fine with transferring only longevity. It would be easier to implement and wouldn't start seniority wars. It's definitely time ALPA starts this conversation. Everyone would win as management loses the scare tactic of forcing concessions or bankruptcy.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:16 AM
  #32  
Ultralight's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jamers
Honestly I would be fine with transferring only longevity. It would be easier to implement and wouldn't start seniority wars. It's definitely time ALPA starts this conversation. Everyone would win as management loses the scare tactic of forcing concessions or bankruptcy.

Me too. Should at least stay in your current pay year if going from one ALPA carrier to another.

At least you get a bad ass new lanyard when you start over again.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:24 AM
  #33  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 123
Default

Transferring longevity isn't a "bad" idea.

That said, put yourselves into management's shoes - would you rather hire somebody off the street making 12 year pay, or somebody making first year pay?

For reasons like this, it'll never happen any more than a "master seniority list" in the airline biz.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:29 AM
  #34  
MunkyButtr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jamers
Honestly I would be fine with transferring only longevity. It would be easier to implement and wouldn't start seniority wars. It's definitely time ALPA starts this conversation. Everyone would win as management loses the scare tactic of forcing concessions or bankruptcy.
Spoken by a Colgan pilot who has already experienced a "longevity" transition. I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the shoe were on the other foot. That transition would demolish career expectations and upgrades for established fo's like it already did at 9e. That would never work. I highly doubt 6 year fo's at other carriers would be OK with someone jumping them on the senority list. The only way longevity transfer would work is strictly pay rates, not seniority, and we all know mgmt teams wouldn't buy into that either.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:45 AM
  #35  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Spoken by a Colgan pilot who has already experienced a "longevity" transition. I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the shoe were on the other foot. That transition would demolish career expectations and upgrades for established fo's like it already did at 9e. That would never work. I highly doubt 6 year fo's at other carriers would be OK with someone jumping them on the senority list. The only way longevity transfer would work is strictly pay rates, not seniority, and we all know mgmt teams wouldn't buy into that either.
Hey Munky how are you today? Didn't know if u knew this, but those of us at CJC lost our base and airplane. It's not all rosy like u paint it out to be. Also many of us holding captain would have held it regardless (looking at pinnacles junior DOH CA). No worries though, it looks like pinnacle is like colgan losing all their airplanes too. Wish it didn't happen for either side. I hope u have a great day mr Buttr!
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:48 AM
  #36  
Jamers's Avatar
Gets Off to Weekends
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Spoken by a Colgan pilot who has already experienced a "longevity" transition. I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the shoe were on the other foot. That transition would demolish career expectations and upgrades for established fo's like it already did at 9e. That would never work. I highly doubt 6 year fo's at other carriers would be OK with someone jumping them on the senority list. The only way longevity transfer would work is strictly pay rates, not seniority, and we all know mgmt teams wouldn't buy into that either.
Longevity in terms of pay rates is strictly what I am referring to. As someone mentioned before, shared gain and sacrifice. As a colgan pilot I experienced a seniority transfer within the ISL, not a longevity transfer. My years of service did not change but the terms of the Bloch award determined my integrated seniority. Mgmt wouldn't agree to allowing someone to get hired at a higher starting pay unless the entire pay scale was reduced in the form of a concession. So I guess you are correct in that it would never work.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:52 AM
  #37  
JethroFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: B767 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Ultralight
Some good points here. If a IBEW electrcian gets laid off the union finds them other work at the same pay. Why can't ALPA do that? Why does a senior captain with several type ratings and thousands of hours of airline experience have to start at the bottom of the pile on year one F.O. pay if they switch carriers? Its the most unfair messed up system.
Honestly I would be fine with transferring only longevity. It would be easier to implement and wouldn't start seniority wars. It's definitely time ALPA starts this conversation. Everyone would win as management loses the scare tactic of forcing concessions or bankruptcy.
That would be cool, but do you think the majors would go for that? Honestly, I'd love to have my 1996 PCL seniority.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 08:54 AM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Spoken by a Colgan pilot who has already experienced a "longevity" transition. I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the shoe were on the other foot. That transition would demolish career expectations and upgrades for established fo's like it already did at 9e. That would never work. I highly doubt 6 year fo's at other carriers would be OK with someone jumping them on the senority list. The only way longevity transfer would work is strictly pay rates, not seniority, and we all know mgmt teams wouldn't buy into that either.
I'm original Pinnacle. Didn't see a lot of sympathy for us when the bankruptcy agreement was being negotiated or ratified. You want me to vote no, you make sure I get my longevity and seniority where I have to go. Other than that, I think I'll take my 5+ earned years and keep my job.
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 11:42 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
, I think I'll take my 5+ earned years and keep my job.
I think year 2 at SKW is more than the 5yr mark payrate y'all voted in. But hey, at least you get to keep your job for a few more months, right?
Reply
Old 03-17-2013 | 11:51 AM
  #40  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by Slats
I think year 2 at SKW is more than the 5yr mark payrate y'all voted in. But hey, at least you get to keep your job for a few more months, right?
Few months? Are we furloughing in a few months?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM
jackace
SkyWest
66
03-21-2012 04:15 PM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
27
03-28-2008 06:54 PM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices