![]() |
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1423560)
Yes I know if we made more the regionals would all shut down or fares would go up but let's just say we lived in a Capitalist country where supply and demand ruled the economy and our hands weren't tied to an old RLA law of the 1700s.
|
Originally Posted by 200Driver
(Post 1423872)
Still makes me laugh every time I see this. People actually believe we are still bound by this...lmao :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1423915)
Elaborate. How are we not?
|
Originally Posted by globalexpress
(Post 1423656)
The free market determines the minimum scale. The minimum scale is obviously pretty low and therefore that's what it should be. As long as a company is able to attract minimally qualified applicants for a given position that meets its needs, that's what the wage should be.
When the regional airlines (or anyone for that matter) are unable to attract applicants for a given position, then they know their total compensation is too low. They then have the choice of either not filling the position and parking the jet (in the case of an airline) or raising wages. |
This has been tried hundreds of times since the beginning of airlines and has NEVER worked. Every new airline since day one tries to do this but It ALWAYS evolves into a corrupt good old boy system in which the company abuses more often than not. Remember pilots and Harvard educated MBA's can be very good at using any weakness in any system to their advantage. I have yet to be at an airline where the pilots haven't found a back door into the rostering system. Even though the company corrects the software fault as it becomes aware, there is always someone who finds another backdoor. Humans are remarkable creatures at exploiting weaknesses and using them to their advantage and until you change that, your system is nothing but a utopian dream.
|
one needs to factor useless or valuable time on a seniority list..... meaning... low 'regional' pay would be easier to swallow if one were gaining career seniority with longevity protection...
|
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1423560)
What would that be? I know we all want to make 100k our first year but that's not realistic. So what is? I'm asking about a minimum scale for the 37-50 seat planes and for it to go up from there. Yes I know if we made more the regionals would all shut down or fares would go up but let's just say we lived in a Capitalist country where supply and demand ruled the economy and our hands weren't tied to an old RLA law of the 1700s. Personally I like the Jazz pay scale. Same job so why should the pay scale be based on seats?
The Railway Labor Act is a United States federal law that governs labor relations in the railroad and airline industries. The Act, passed in 1926 and amended in 1934 and 1936, seeks to substitute bargaining, arbitration and mediation for strikes as a means of resolving labor disputes. Its provisions were originally enforced under the Board of Mediation, but were later enforced under a National Mediation Board. |
Originally Posted by maxjet
(Post 1423952)
I agree with this 100% You are already seeing evidence of this in the bonuses being paid at regionals now. Pay will be next but it will take a very long time. If you have been at a regional for the past 10 years, not by choice but because of the lack of movement then you have the right to ***** a little. If you haven't, then suck it up and get a second job just like the rest of us have had to do for years. IT IS A REGIONAL! You are not supposed to have any money. They are giving you a ticket to the big show! If you don't like it, vote with your feet and GTFO! Nothing worse than having to live in a crash pad that smells like AS*, making no money, working every weekend, and a stagnated market. You finally get to fly the plane, the part we all love, and some jackwagon wants to ***** all day about the company and how little they are paying them. Give me a break! Do you think this is a new development? You knew or should have known the rules when you signed up. Stop ruining my fun with your bullcrap while at work. Now if you only complain on these boards and not on the flight deck, or in the crew room, or at the crash pad, then please accept my apology because I feel that venting on the boards is therapeutic. The rest of the places mentioned are just like a hemorrhoid to me. Some of you just suck with all of your whining!
And most of these people did not know any better, they thought they'd move along in 2 years or so. There weren't all these websites with pilot pay all over the place, and even when there are, it's hard to know exactly where to go and what to check when you are not connected with the industry and pilots. I notice lots of pilots like to play a double-standard, not informing young people about the realities, but then blaming them when they start complaining about the realities. It's like "you should 'do the research'", but we are going to "hide it from you" and then make you sound like an idiot when you start complaining. |
Originally Posted by Cubdriver
(Post 1423747)
I am not absolutely sure about this but I suspect Colgan 3407 may have been a result of market failure to adequately create reasonable wages for low end airline pilots. It certainly looks that way to me. My point is again, that boundaries need to be defined when and if the markets run afoul of sensible minimums. If a full time worker earns less than enough to sleep and eat each day, something is wrong. We can eliminate the job which is not good for the greater majority, this case the traveling public, or we can regulate wages to a safe minimum. Hopefully the people and their government are smart enough to do this before airplanes crash. This is not always the case unfortunately, as reactive regulation is more common than proactive regulation.
In italics, I agree completely. Yes, it is a failure of the regulatory system, unions, and companies all together that this is where we are at. In many ways I blame the RLA and NMB for being laws so union and company friendly that they leave the employee out in the rain, starving. The sentence underlined is two part. The general traveling public is still somewhat ignorant to what pilot wages are. Even all the education attempted after colgan fell on a largely deaf public. So maybe there's no getting people to learn. And of all the congressional regulation that came into effect recently, nothing directly regulates a pilots wage. The "1500 hour rule" was supposed to use market forces to drive up wages. In some ways it has, and in some ways (ref. Great Lakes) its still business as usual. Even as pilots leave in mass with nobody coming up the pipeline. The second underlined sentence, yes, regulation has always been reactive rather than proactive. Somebody referenced that regional pilots must just need second jobs. That is what I had to do given my paycheck and situation. But does the flying public really want pilots flying them who are putting in 16 hour duty days and working a second job as much as possible just to survive? But again, this is an education issue. |
Thanks USM. I know what year it was passed and amended. Not the point. It's old and ties our hands. It's part of the reason we are where we are.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands