Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Gulfstream Write Up in Plane & Pilot >

Gulfstream Write Up in Plane & Pilot


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Gulfstream Write Up in Plane & Pilot

Old 12-19-2006 | 09:26 PM
  #101  
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: FO - 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I have limited experience with ATP, but I have to agree that if you're looking for a package-deal kind of place it seems decent (compared to the other big schools). They don't try to send non-cfi's to airlines, and they do not appear to try to rip you off in training.

My preference would still be a good mom & pop kind of place at the local patch...if one is available. You can meet all kinds of people at a place like that.
wrong wrong wrong. I know for a FACT that they do. You need to do more research SIR!!!!!
Reply
Old 12-19-2006 | 09:27 PM
  #102  
STR8NLVL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Good point STR8, I forgot to mention that you guys get bonuses when your students pass checkrides. But I still stand by my $6/hr assessment of your pay. You only broke down your pay by flight hour, saying you averaged 100 FLIGHT hours per month. What about time that wasn't flight time? My understanding was that you are required to work in the office when you aren't with students. You said that you regularly would FLY 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. By my math that is 56 hours/week. Assuming you did nothing but fly for every one of those hours (meaning your work day started when you got in the airplane and ended when you got out at the end of the day) and using your average of $1600/mo ($1200/mo salary + $400 in bonuses) then you were making $7.14/hr that week. Sorry I short changed you by saying it was $6/hr. Now, lets be realistic. If you were FLYING for 8 hours that day, I bet you did at least a little pre and post flight breifing, right? Lets say for every 2 hour lesson you did .5 pre and post that comes out to a 10 hour day. Do that for a week and you worked 70 hours. Divide that by your average of $400/wk and you come up with...$5.71/hr. So I guess the truth lies somewhere in between.

I know you don't actually get paid $6/hr. I arrived at that number by taking your salary ($1200/mo) and dividing it by a reasonable number of hours worked per week (50). I'm not talking straight flight time because all of us who instructed know that all your time with students is not just spent in the airplane. Allow me to recalculate with the bonuses factored in:
$1625/mo (the average of the numbers you provided) divided by 200 hours of work = $8.12. Wow...

So yes, it is sometimes nice to be salaried but when you calculate it out, it can also suck. My last CFI job paid $21.50/hr and I regularly billed 150 hours a month between flying (about 80hrs/mo), ground instruction and sim time. I'd take the flexibility over being "owned" by a salary any day. If I wanted to work my tail off I could make some real decent money. If I wanted to chill and take some time off, I could do that too and not have to worry about losing my job.
Now you're double talking. On the one hand, you figure total hours on the job to criticize ATP by figuring I earned $6/hr. Then you go on to state that you earned $21.50/hr for FLIGHT hours (and sim and ground). That's not a fair comparison. And again, each person's mileage will vary. But I'd have to say that most FBO jobs only pay for flight hours, and it's about a 50/50 split whether you get paid for ground time or not. The FBO I trained at didn't charge anything (and hence, didn't pay the CFI anything) for ground instruction. You have to admit, your job was the exception, not the rule.

Still, like I said, I'm certainly not claiming that ATP overpaid it's CFI's. But I knew what I was getting, made comparable wages to what my CFI buddies at FBO's made, and got much more time all ME. It's not a bad gig if you want to earn a ton of hours fast and move on.

Also, figure I was only doing ME instrument instruction with lots of sim training, too, which made my instrument skills/knowledge very sharp. Most of my FBO CFI friends spend 80-90% of their training teaching 40 year old mid-life crisis businessmen stalls in 172's, half of whom quit after soloing and 70% of whom never even complete training to be signed off and passed. I, on the other hand signed off over 80 people in three months with only 4 busts, earning a gold seal on my CFI certificate.

I just think its not a bad place at all to work if you're not planning on doing it there for a career.
Reply
Old 12-19-2006 | 09:30 PM
  #103  
STR8NLVL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
wrong wrong wrong. I know for a FACT that they do. You need to do more research SIR!!!!!
I'll have to give you this one. While most of their students go through the career program and finish as CFI's, they do have a program where you can just get the commercial ratings, then buy your time building time to get enough hours to qualify for an airline interview. However, it's been a failed program with less than 10 people going through it in over 2 years. A very small percentage of students overall.
Reply
Old 12-19-2006 | 09:32 PM
  #104  
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: FO - 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
No I can't. I also see the big picture. ME time, good mx, lots of students, and a faster route to the 121 world.

-LAFF
Aren't you older? Not to brag, but I am 33(ok, almost 34) and am flying(right seat) with UPS. I hope that you see the whole big picture. In short, I hope you know what you are getting into(i.e. I am in this position ONLY because I am a chick...that's it!) If you are thinking that you are gonna just slide in and have a smooth, easy trip......you are in for a RUDE AWAKENING!
Reply
Old 12-19-2006 | 09:41 PM
  #105  
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: FO - 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL
THEY don't pass anyone. The DE's do. And if you've flown with them to know that they are "unqualified," then your company passed them, too. And what does being female have to do with it anyway? All the weak pilots that I knew were guys. The females that I flew with at ATP were some of the strongest pilots in the lot.
First of all: I AM A FEMALE! I am saying this, not to generalize about CHICKS; rather to say that the PEOPLE that I am referring to are WOMEN. If they were men, I would indicate so. They, however, happend to be WOMEN. My point? The people who notice such things (i.e. race, gender, creed etc). are REALLY the ones who think that race, gender creed, etc are an issue.......I don't think that it is an issue. I only mention it to make a story. If they were BLUE, I would also say so....get it??????
Reply
Old 12-19-2006 | 09:50 PM
  #106  
STR8NLVL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
First of all: I AM A FEMALE! I am saying this, not to generalize about CHICKS; rather to say that the PEOPLE that I am referring to are WOMEN. If they were men, I would indicate so. They, however, happend to be WOMEN. My point? The people who notice such things (i.e. race, gender, creed etc). are REALLY the ones who think that race, gender creed, etc are an issue.......I don't think that it is an issue. I only mention it to make a story. If they were BLUE, I would also say so....get it??????
No, I still don't get it. You said they were all "eek" females, as if that were scary. To me it seemed irrelevant. Anyway, you already apologized for lumping all ATP grads into one pile, and I accept that. I still, however resent your comment that they pass unqualified people, because as I previously stated, 1) I know that NOT to be true, and 2) if you flew with them, then your employer at that time passed them, too.

Weak pilots can meet the mins of a test and sneak through at any school. I saw some pass that while I knew they were weak, they were able to meet the PTS. Didn't mean I would want them flying my wife around in actual to mins, but I certainly couldn't stop them from getting their certificates.

ATP is a good school that delivers on its promises and is places a lot of emphasis to its new hires that man the phones on being truthful in their discussions with potential students. They don't promise jobs, etc. And they provide good instruction that I KNOW made me a very competent pilot. It just makes me mad when I hear someone who clearly doesn't have any actual inside knowledge call them shady, etc, on a public forum. That's just simply not true.

Merry Christmas to you.

PS - So you think if I got a sex change I could get on at UPS?
Reply
Old 12-20-2006 | 06:19 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL
Now you're double talking. On the one hand, you figure total hours on the job to criticize ATP by figuring I earned $6/hr. Then you go on to state that you earned $21.50/hr for FLIGHT hours (and sim and ground). That's not a fair comparison. And again, each person's mileage will vary. But I'd have to say that most FBO jobs only pay for flight hours, and it's about a 50/50 split whether you get paid for ground time or not. The FBO I trained at didn't charge anything (and hence, didn't pay the CFI anything) for ground instruction. You have to admit, your job was the exception, not the rule.

Still, like I said, I'm certainly not claiming that ATP overpaid it's CFI's. But I knew what I was getting, made comparable wages to what my CFI buddies at FBO's made, and got much more time all ME. It's not a bad gig if you want to earn a ton of hours fast and move on.

Also, figure I was only doing ME instrument instruction with lots of sim training, too, which made my instrument skills/knowledge very sharp. Most of my FBO CFI friends spend 80-90% of their training teaching 40 year old mid-life crisis businessmen stalls in 172's, half of whom quit after soloing and 70% of whom never even complete training to be signed off and passed. I, on the other hand signed off over 80 people in three months with only 4 busts, earning a gold seal on my CFI certificate.

I just think its not a bad place at all to work if you're not planning on doing it there for a career.
Not sure where you think I was double talking. I used your figure of 8 hours of FLYING per day and added 2 hours of pre and post brief time for a total work day of 10 hours, not counting breaks or lunch. How is that unfair? My understanding was that at ATP you are required to be in the office from open to close. Thats where I come up with the 50 hours of work a week number. If that is incorrect, please tell me. At all of my CFI jobs I was not required to be at the airport unless I had a student scheduled.

I said that I got paid $21.50/hr and would regularly bill 150 hours a month. I said that included flying, brief and sim time. So show me where its not a fair comparison. About half of what I logged was ME time, so thats not a bad deal. I guess I got lucky because I instructed at a large university program.

But I stand by my original statement. You guys at ATP get short changed and your more than happy to do it to get to that next level (the regionals). How is that any different from the guys who get short changed at places like Mesa or GoJets who are just looking for that fast track to the next level (majors)?
Reply
Old 12-20-2006 | 10:35 AM
  #108  
kansas's Avatar
Swearing at the FMA
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: MD-88 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Slice
There's been alot of changes at 1K1 in the past few years(runway, FBO)...hope to get back and visit next year. A few Stearmans on the field now too!
Including the name...It's "Stearman Field," now!
Reply
Old 12-20-2006 | 04:44 PM
  #109  
STR8NLVL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
But I stand by my original statement. You guys at ATP get short changed and your more than happy to do it to get to that next level (the regionals). How is that any different from the guys who get short changed at places like Mesa or GoJets who are just looking for that fast track to the next level (majors)?
As I said previously, I think your situation would be the exception, not the rule. Most CFI's I know of only get paid per flight hour and most don't get paid for ground. While pay at ATP isn't spectacular compared to other jobs, it's in the middle of the road compared to other CFI jobs, so I don't think we're getting shorted at all. Just getting good time on top of mediocre pay.
Reply
Old 12-21-2006 | 08:55 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Cool Wake up and smell the coffee...

Originally Posted by bassslayer
So which is it? Obviously they made it through 121 training if the are requesting a jump seat on "your airplane", so that would make them "every bit as equal" and worthy of the jumpseat. But yet they are still an ATP grad. No ATP grads will jumpseat when you are captain remember? Are you going to ask every jump seater where they went to flight school? So no Gulfstreamers, ATPers, who else will the almighty deny a jump seat to? Get a life.
No matter what program or route you came from, you paid for it one way or another. If you came from the military (if you made it through) you paid for it with your life. If you went the intructor route you paid for all your ratings and you paid for it with your life at the edge of your seat and if you went to these fast track schools you paid for it. In most cases most of us did not want to instruct. Some of us are made for intructing and some are not so why force them? No matter where you come from, the ailrines will hire you. If you pass their interview and their training they will hire you No matter where you came from. The only ones that complain are the bitter pilots. There are Captains from major airlines that sent their kids through these programs. Bottom line is if you have Part 121 experience and turbine time your odds of getting hired are much higher. And the captain that says he won't allow you to jumpseat...like the other guy said get a life and grow up because you are a bad example for kids that want to pursue their dream to fly in the airline. I know hundreds of pilots flying on regionals and majors that came from these programs and there are no problems.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KiloAlpha
Corporate
7
12-30-2015 04:41 PM
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
JesseSW
Hangar Talk
3
08-18-2006 10:04 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices