![]() |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1606971)
In 10 years no one on property will still be here. Let's indulge the scenario where we are though.
AAG would have a fleet commitment at Eagle that would be in their best financial interest to comply with. If eagle was then unable to staff the committed flying because of a regional pilot shortage (which is already here) then they would be forced to increase compensation to attract pilots. You can talk about "reasoning" with me but so far all I've seen is emotion and doomsday theories. There is no math to back up voting this down unless you're a lifer. Everyone will either A) move to AA faster or B) upgrade faster this increasing compensation over the current contract. If one of those economy shattering events come to pass it won't matter at all what contract you have, the companies will go to bankruptcy for relief and they'll get it. I understand the anger, I felt it when LAX closed as a crew base. It doesn't do any good though, just makes you bitter. I looked at the facts and this deal suits me personally better than the current contract. I hope everyone votes, whether it be yes or no so we can get this nonsense behind us. |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1606971)
I understand the anger, I felt it when LAX closed as a crew base |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1606714)
I agree with most of your post other than that we are worth what we negotiate. In my opinion we are worth what supply and demand dictates. Unions are a relic of the industrial era and serve more to bleed their members of dues than anything else.
I do value the skills I've cultivated in this career path, that's why I refuse to be stuck somewhere that does not appreciate my abilities and I'll do anything I can to move on. I really do admire the altruistic ideal of "standing up for industry" and I wish you guys success but it's just not me. I voted no but stated that it was a difficult decision. You blasted me for even thinking about voting yes....My response? Wait until it is YOUR chance to vote. Because what it takes, and what it means, to vote NO really sinks in since it is now YOUR job, YOUR family, and YOUR livelihood. I do pretty much agree with what you are saying, but after seeing you be so vocal against other groups that had a difficult decision it's difficult to read and comes off as disingenuous. |
Originally Posted by meeko031
(Post 1606981)
...are you that FO that commutes from Vegas?
Pagey I apologize for blasting you guys, I was an angry internet warrior. I realized these decisions can't be made with a one size fits all approach and that what people decide for their families is no business of mine. In the end this is a job, not some cause to crusade for like a lot on these boards advocate. So again, I apologize. 80kts, I don't really regret turning that job down. I have heard very few success stories of guys making lateral moves. The only part of compass I really regret not being part of is how happy their people seemed to be in relation to what I've experienced at Eagle. |
[QUOTE=Bzzt;1606714 In my opinion we are worth what supply and demand dictates. [/QUOTE]
If that's what you believe in, you don't act on your beliefs. Right now, demand is outpacing supply and in another year or so, it will be much more advantageous for those who are part of the supply. By voting this in now, you strip any hope of actually turning what you supposedly believe in (which I don't believe for a minute) into something you can capitalize on. Like I said, I don't believe this bunk. What you REALLY believe in is, "me, myself and I" and believe this is good for you NOW and have no concern for anything else. If this passes, you're going to regret your position in the long-run and if this fails, you're too self-concerned to CORRECTLY identify and act on what is really in your best interests. |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1607091)
No.
Pagey I apologize for blasting you guys, I was an angry internet warrior. I realized these decisions can't be made with a one size fits all approach and that what people decide for their families is no business of mine. In the end this is a job, not some cause to crusade for like a lot on these boards advocate. So again, I apologize. 80kts, I don't really regret turning that job down. I have heard very few success stories of guys making lateral moves. The only part of compass I really regret not being part of is how happy their people seemed to be in relation to what I've experienced at Eagle. BTW, does the current contract have an anti up clause since their so profitable now? Wouldn’t you lose that if it was there? |
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1607137)
...You could have a better Qol as a high school gym teacher make what you make now, and in most states a constitutionally protected pension. ...
|
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1606714)
I agree with most of your post other than that we are worth what we negotiate. In my opinion we are worth what supply and demand dictates. Unions are a relic of the industrial era and serve more to bleed their members of dues than anything else.
I do value the skills I've cultivated in this career path, that's why I refuse to be stuck somewhere that does not appreciate my abilities and I'll do anything I can to move on. I really do admire the altruistic ideal of "standing up for industry" and I wish you guys success but it's just not me. |
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 1607159)
Not to derail you but that teachers pensions sounds great but it probably wont be there when you go to collect. Everything changed with Detroit entering bankruptcy. Rhode Island or California will be next and no pension will be safe.
You are probably right as they have set a trend, and pensions are a thing of the past, but technically the unfunded pension is only 3 billion and the total city debt is 17 billion, so the bond holders of that debt have the biggest fears right now. Same thing with AA they can now afford every pension 5 years or older they washed out in BK. The right model is so much more than the pay package. There is just no reasonable way to say now all new hires don’t get pensions; it usually is an all or nothing deal. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1607114)
If that's what you believe in, you don't act on your beliefs. Right now, demand is outpacing supply and in another year or so, it will be much more advantageous for those who are part of the supply. By voting this in now, you strip any hope of actually turning what you supposedly believe in (which I don't believe for a minute) into something you can capitalize on.
Like I said, I don't believe this bunk. What you REALLY believe in is, "me, myself and I" and believe this is good for you NOW and have no concern for anything else. If this passes, you're going to regret your position in the long-run and if this fails, you're too self-concerned to CORRECTLY identify and act on what is really in your best interests. And I have correctly identified my actions. I update my apps to major airlines after every trip, I do volunteer work, and I'm going to job fairs this year. I am doing everything I can to escape this steaming pile of a job. Can't remember who posted it but something along the lines of mainline only provides pay and pride, that's not true. Their schedules are better due to the nature of their flying and this the qol is infinitely superior to regionals. That is the reason I want over there. As to Compass. I am comfortable making 40k + the 20k my wife makes. I could not afford to pay for a hotel in training + airfare to training + 24k my first year. All those things combined to make a significant financial hardship. In the end I do believe this will get voted down and I am comfortable with that decision if it comes to pass. In either case I'm going to work the next 3 years at Eagle and if I can't get a career job I'm out. I'm at peace with however this plays out. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands