DECs for Silver?
03-21-2014 | 11:36 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: E-175 CA
For the record, since the company is now doling out CA pay to the senior FOs, if they hire more DECs, all FOs should be getting CA pay rates.
03-21-2014 | 11:57 AM
#3
I'm a man of my word.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Not a chance. There are still dozens of senior FOs who are qualified and waiting their turn. Unless the company plans on retaining FOs by using bypass pay instead of the failed LOA to raise their pay, it is highly unlikely.
For the record, since the company is now doling out CA pay to the senior FOs, if they hire more DECs, all FOs should be getting CA pay rates.
For the record, since the company is now doling out CA pay to the senior FOs, if they hire more DECs, all FOs should be getting CA pay rates.
As for bypass pay, the Company firmly believes it's one-for-one. The language for bypass pay reads:
Originally Posted by CBA
A Pilot will be pay protected when a junior Pilot is advanced to his new Status (Base, Equipment Type and Seat Position) before a more senior Pilot is advanced to the same Status.
03-21-2014 | 01:46 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: E-175 CA
Agreed, highly unlikely. However, the Company MUST do something to attract pilots. We've given them some ideas of how to do it... we'll just have to wait and see what they decide.
As for bypass pay, the Company firmly believes it's one-for-one. The language for bypass pay reads:
The Company's logic is that "a" is defined as "used with units of measurement to mean one such unit." They argue that it if bypass pay were to apply to all pilots senior to one such junior pilot in a higher paying status, the language should read "Any/All/Every pilot will be pay protected when a junior pilot..."
As for bypass pay, the Company firmly believes it's one-for-one. The language for bypass pay reads:
The Company's logic is that "a" is defined as "used with units of measurement to mean one such unit." They argue that it if bypass pay were to apply to all pilots senior to one such junior pilot in a higher paying status, the language should read "Any/All/Every pilot will be pay protected when a junior pilot..."
03-21-2014 | 02:57 PM
#5
I'm a man of my word.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
03-21-2014 | 08:41 PM
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Back on Reserve
DECs for Silver?
DEC's are doubtful for now. Some of the DEC's from the last hiring stint will more than likely be downgraded for a short time once CLE closes as a base and there is a new system staffing bid.
03-22-2014 | 07:00 PM
#7
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 2
Agreed, highly unlikely. However, the Company MUST do something to attract pilots. We've given them some ideas of how to do it... we'll just have to wait and see what they decide.
As for bypass pay, the Company firmly believes it's one-for-one. The language for bypass pay reads:
The Company's logic is that "a" is defined as "used with units of measurement to mean one such unit." They argue that it if bypass pay were to apply to all pilots senior to one such junior pilot in a higher paying status, the language should read "Any/All/Every pilot will be pay protected when a junior pilot..."
As for bypass pay, the Company firmly believes it's one-for-one. The language for bypass pay reads:
The Company's logic is that "a" is defined as "used with units of measurement to mean one such unit." They argue that it if bypass pay were to apply to all pilots senior to one such junior pilot in a higher paying status, the language should read "Any/All/Every pilot will be pay protected when a junior pilot..."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
