Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle Pilots Vote No!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2014, 09:28 AM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: looking for both
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector View Post
You haven't prevented a race to the bottom. AA will award flying to another Regional with much lower costs and no career progression.

That Regional will stumble over themselves to accept that flying. The pilots will pretend to be "reluctantly" performing those flights while really excited at flying an American Eagle E-175. Most if not all of your junior FOs will bail for these other Regionals who are getting the new flying. Your mid-level FOs will stagnate while junior Captains will displace back to FO.

So what have you accomplished, exactly? Had this been voted through you would have had AA on the hook for 170 aircraft MINIMUM which is far beyond any fleet guarantee that any Regional has.

If/When staffing became an issue AA would have had no choice but to raise first year pay.

So again, what have you accomplished? I know many of you are real giddy right now. It always feels good to poke management in the eye. But you need to realize the concepts of "unity" don't exist in the way you hope.
Silly Management propaganda. You didn't count on social media keeping people so well informed about what's going on throughout the industry.

The fact is that there aren't enough pilots being hired at any of the Regionals. Most of the big players are having to shrink to satisfy the flying demand they currently have with the majors. So while most would love to pick up the flying, they can't, not unless they get rid of smaller, less efficient aircraft. Kinda like Republic just did with their 140's - 145's. They had to give up 20+ frames so they can staff the new flying from AA.

Who will pick up all that Eagle flying? That airline does not exist, nor the pilots to staff it. Personally, I hope the entire Regional industry burns, and mainline has to get most of that flying back in house. And it's slowly moving in that direction finally. In a week you'll have about 10,000 Regional pilots who are sick of this free fall to the bottom.

What have we accomplished? Change, my friend, is what we're about to accomplish.
SSMR13 is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:28 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Position: CFIT cannot be logged as a landing?!
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector View Post
You haven't prevented a race to the bottom. AA will award flying to another Regional with much lower costs and no career progression.

That Regional will stumble over themselves to accept that flying. The pilots will pretend to be "reluctantly" performing those flights while really excited at flying an American Eagle E-175. Most if not all of your junior FOs will bail for these other Regionals who are getting the new flying. Your mid-level FOs will stagnate while junior Captains will displace back to FO.

So what have you accomplished, exactly? Had this been voted through you would have had AA on the hook for 170 aircraft MINIMUM which is far beyond any fleet guarantee that any Regional has.

If/When staffing became an issue AA would have had no choice but to raise first year pay.

So again, what have you accomplished? I know many of you are real giddy right now. It always feels good to poke management in the eye. But you need to realize the concepts of "unity" don't exist in the way you hope.
Change your avitar to someone who displays your Debbie Downer attitude. Goose was always blindly optimistic.

Something like this suits you better:

exdashtrash is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:28 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Guppy Captain
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector View Post
Obviously, you don't. Like I said: you guys are calling a MAJOR bluff and it is all fun and games right now.

Lets see how you feel when the squeeze begins to really hurt. You may care a little more then.
Trust me, we all realize the ramifications and the potential end result from this vote. I doubt there are even many no voters, who are "giddy", as you put it, right now. What we do realize is that we have done our part in a potential turning point in our industry when our companies are making record profits and struggling to staff their feed. If now is not the time to take a stand, then when will that time come?

I won't bemoan or belittle any pilot group that receives these aircraft as long as they do not accept concessions to receive them. I was fully aware of this potential when I cast my vote.

The only roadblock that the pilot profession faces in the next few years is a lack of unity and people who think like you. If we can't get meaningful improvements to our current contracts, or AT LEAST maintain our status quo (which by the way is a concessionary contract and signed a little over a year ago,) in this current environment, than the industry is truly lost and we would all be better served to just get out and move on.
V1 ROT8 is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:29 AM
  #94  
I'm a man of my word.
 
CaptainCarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2,883
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector View Post
Obviously, you don't. Like I said: you guys are calling a MAJOR bluff and it is all fun and games right now.

Lets see how you feel when the squeeze begins to really hurt. You may care a little more then.
You're in the top spot for TOTD! Congratulations!
CaptainCarl is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:31 AM
  #95  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
The squeeze its being hurting for the last 3 years, a little more it's not a problem.
Ever since AA declared bankruptcy in November 2011 Eagle has been ignored and kept in the dark about it's future.

While that sucks and creates an air of uncertainty among the ranks, it is no where near a "squeeze".

Status Quo is what Eagle has been experiencing for the past 3 years which is hardly any kind of hurt. It makes you apprehensive, sure. But doesn't hurt.

I hope this gamble pays off. I really do. I just think you guys aren't seeing the reality of the situation.
Skyvector is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:34 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: CRJ
Posts: 249
Default

Good job and congrats Eagle!
AZFlyn1 is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:36 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

From another former AE guy, congratulations to the entire pilot group for having the collective fortitude to resoundingly vote NO to another concessionary contract proposal. Your MEC voted NO twice, but the company and other naysayers said "let the pilots vote, instead of letting the MEC dictate their desire to the plots." Well, you DID, and you voted overwhelmingly to reject the proposal. Kudos!

My feeling is RAH will send at least as strong a message.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:39 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 394
Default

In the future, the three successive no votes from XJet, Eagle, and soon to be RAH will be viewed as a turning point in the airline pilot profession. We are taking the leverage we finally know we have a forcing the regional airline model to change. I am very proud to be a part of this movement.

Enjoy the victory, but keep focused. Things may get harder before they get easier for all of us. With unity, we can continue to apply the pressure and make this a career worth having again.
Shiner is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:46 AM
  #99  
Need More Flight Time!
 
Flying Ninja's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Flight Simulator X
Posts: 400
Default

Congratulations Eagle pilots!
Flying Ninja is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 09:52 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector View Post
Obviously, you don't. Like I said: you guys are calling a MAJOR bluff and it is all fun and games right now.

Lets see how you feel when the squeeze begins to really hurt. You may care a little more then.
You're wrong. Believe me, they've made it crystal clear all along what the alternative is. We know that other regionals will take the flying, and that even if they have subsequent staffing problems, it will be awhile before those problems help us. We know all of that. And we said no anyway. Because somewhere this BS has to stop. And while our leverage isn't all-powerful right now, it is stronger than it has ever been. EXJ, EGF, and RAH all saying no right now is a pretty strong statement. Let's take a look at the industry in a year from now, when the first of the 175s we turned down are being delivered to Mesa or Compass or Piedmont or whoever. Let's see what the staffing situation is everywhere after another 1500+ regional pilots are hired at the mainline.

Anyway, obviously it is a chance we're taking, but one made with eyes wide open.
ORDinary is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AllisonRR
Regional
69
03-28-2014 06:59 AM
newcfii
Regional
16
01-14-2014 07:32 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
John Pennekamp
Major
28
02-13-2007 01:08 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices