Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future? >

Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2014, 05:01 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Talking

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
^
|
|
The double breast is strong with this one.








It seems his too tight collar/tie has cut off the oxygen supply to his too tiny "membrain"!

Last edited by Paid2fly; 05-04-2014 at 05:18 PM.
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:16 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by MEMbrain
Oh please.... Sully or Al Haynes vs. Marvin.
And while you're at it don't forget to mention the Northwest crew that overflew MSP, or the Delta crew that "accidentally" landed on the taxiway. Or the crew that landed at the wrong airport, just to name a few that come to mind. There are errors that happen in the military to. Why is that, because we're human and not perfect. BTW, you just proved my point, you are one of the 2%
gojo is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 06:01 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Default

Major hiring depts are not impressed with the military or civilian versions of chuck yeager, or the cocky attitudes they bring with them.

They look for pilots that can sit in a cockpit for 12 hours at a time with the ability to play well with others, portray the airlines branded image, and operate a safe plane.

Bring the "iceman" tude to an interview and no amount of lunar landings will get u a job. Bring a humble, energetic, can-do attitude...u are in.

Background may get u an interview quicker, but it wont get u the job necessarily.
LandGreen2 is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 07:11 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DOGIII's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: and Hold
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011



If the company was absorbed entirely, wouldn't you have to combine the two seniority lists? It would be easier to do what American did to TWA. Fold the company and take the assets. Pilots would be stapled to the bottom if they wish to apply.

The idea I was proposing here was not to combine the seniority lists in the traditional sense but staple the entire pilot group to the bottom of the mainline list as is.
Why fold up a perfectly good and cost effective operation when they love the cheap feed so much?

Some pilots could choose to bid bigger equipment and better salaries when they can hold it.
Some could elect to stay on the rj. Perhaps you might even have a few bid down to the rj for a specific base, better qol etc.
Everyone would benefit from mainline seniority, longevity and benefits.
This absorbed or acquired regional would have stacks of applicants keeping the express/connection/shuttle operation well staffed.
The major can decide to control the hiring process as well.

Mainline pilots would control all flying, this could be a very powerful negotiating chip for the next round of talks.
Can any current or past mainline pilots weigh in on this issue?
General input from anybody else is welcome as well.

There are still some issues I do not have definitive solutions to:
- Salary at the absorbed carrier (low enough to appeal to the acquiring major, high enough to attract applicants).

- Union, pilot group and management political realities.
Are these real hurdles or could this program benefit enough parties that it might end up a reality...

Last edited by DOGIII; 05-04-2014 at 07:39 PM.
DOGIII is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 07:38 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
swamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by MEMbrain
No we don't. I fly heavies all over the world. I do ocean crossings and operate to countries that you can barely understand the controllers. I fly in countries that use metric altimetry. I've been there, done that. You haven't.
I've too have done class 2 extended overwater operations, flown into countries where English is probably their 3rd or 4th language at best while dealing with some nasty terrain avoidance, hell, I had a "heavy" A300, crash on approach 45 min after I landed in one of these foreign countries, killing all 3 crew and two on the ground. Did all this in a CRJ.
swamp is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 07:52 PM
  #76  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by MEMbrain
What about the military pilots and those with previous heavy time from defunct carriers. They deserve to start out on mainline type equipment as they have "paid their dues". The traditional regional newhire hasn't paid their dues and should start out in an RJ.


You guys got to know when somebody's trollin. Don't bite on crap.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 07:54 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
swamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by MEMbrain
What about the military pilots and those with previous heavy time from defunct carriers. They deserve to start out on mainline type equipment as they have "paid their dues". The traditional regional newhire hasn't paid their dues and should start out in an RJ.
That is a very dangerous word in this industry.

Since you like red so much....
swamp is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 08:15 PM
  #78  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

A better flow with their major partners to attract new hires is probably on the horizon. However, any form of merger/staple job would destroy ALPA. There is no chance of a staple happening, neither management or mainline pilots will allow that.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 08:26 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: emb-145 ca
Posts: 212
Default

Please prove to me that what the regionals supply is actually "cheap feed." This is possibly the biggest false term that just keeps getting kicked around on this forum.

Just because regional pilots don't make much of a paycheck doesn't mean the operation is "cheap" for who is paying for all of it, when costs and revenue are the main things you use to determine what is "cheap" or not. Add in 400% jet fuel increase in 10 years, more senior pilot groups almost everywhere, and less revenue due to less seats on RJs to support it all, and I promise, on a per-passenger cost/revenue basis it is no where near the efficiency of 130-200 seat mainline aircraft. Even at $30-$40 a barrel for fuel the role of RJs was tenuous at best. I actually have no idea how they have been allowed to continue as long as they have. Because they are expensive and inefficient.


I think they will just let all the small, expensive RJs slowly go out of the system, and replace what they have to with the cheapest possible 76-90 seat RJ or send it to mainline. If they can't staff those large RJs, then maybe they will do something. But my gut says not likely. That is the fight that's on right now. How cheap and how long term can they make the large RJ contracts. So far they are 0 for 3.
CaptainNameless is offline  
Old 05-05-2014, 12:24 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,387
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
A better flow with their major partners to attract new hires is probably on the horizon. However, any form of merger/staple job would destroy ALPA. There is no chance of a staple happening, neither management or mainline pilots will allow that.
Nor would the regional pilots if past history is a guide.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
guido15
Regional
60
02-16-2012 08:03 PM
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
Flyby1206
Major
9
06-17-2009 10:23 AM
sigep_nm
Regional
52
02-22-2007 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices