Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Thanks ALPA for being a miserable failure >

Thanks ALPA for being a miserable failure

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Thanks ALPA for being a miserable failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2014 | 07:57 AM
  #81  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I had a CEO at Delta personally tell me he did not care if he paid a 777 CA 500 an hour because the aircraft generated the revenue to support the pay. He then added that if he paid that on the 777 we would demand 400 an hour for the 737 and the airframe could not support that wage.
Sounds like a line I would say to one of my workers, it is also a lie. The CBA as a whole has a value attached to it. The individual pay rates are decided by the union. The union voted in a blended rate at Alaska for the 737's, Mesaba had a blended rate too.

From form 4 data:
DALPA contract: $1.900 billion / ~11000 pilots = ~$173K per pilot
SWAPA contract: $1.300 billion / ~5500 pilots = ~$236K per pilot

You are paid based on what you negotiate collectively. You stated you wish SWAPA would do some heavy lifting for the industry, what was that based on?
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 08:30 AM
  #82  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
You are paid based on what you negotiate collectively. You stated you wish SWAPA would do some heavy lifting for the industry, what was that based on?
Based on typical Delta chest thumping now that they're finally making what the SWA guys have been making since the early 2000s.

Cue tsquare to give me a "history lesson" about their amazing pay rates back when most of us at the regionals were learning algebra. Save it - I get it - you made a lot back then. Then it was mismanaged out of your hands. Finally, you've got the train back on the tracks. Kudos. Only problem is, you've talked down to the industry the whole time, without any reason for doing so - other than your inflated egos.

Heavy lifting? Is that was 4-8-3-3 is to you?
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 09:02 AM
  #83  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

More form 4 data:
SWA revenue 2013 = $17.69 billion / fleet size = $29.63 million, revenue per plane
DAL revenue 2013 = $37.77 billion / fleet size = $50.83 million, revenue per plane

The numbers speak for themselves guys!
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 09:20 AM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

T doesn't need my help, but I can't let this slide. Historically southwest was a major drag on industry contracts. From their inception they paid less, worked more, had no retirement, but had fun doing it. Sorta like my commuter days(much more fun then the grown up airlines). Lots of the early employees gambled on a start up and got lucky with stock. Even as recent as the late 90s(really pre 9/11) they were somewhere between a good regional and a major. It wasn't until the prison rape of ch11 that they exceeded our contracts(it was not any heavy lifting by swapa, it was the swipe of a pen by a judge). LUV has always had a cost advantage, whether it be labor costs(inception to legacy ch11), then fuel hedges, etc and I would never count them out. Now they don't and things appear to be turning more legacy like and it will be interesting. Will they allow a b or c scale small jet operation on property or will they allow that flying to be outsourced to a partner? They need to find a way to grow their revenues for Wall street. From talking to relatives and friends there the LUV is not lost yet, but is getting stale.




Originally Posted by paxhauler85
Based on typical Delta chest thumping now that they're finally making what the SWA guys have been making since the early 2000s.

Cue tsquare to give me a "history lesson" about their amazing pay rates back when most of us at the regionals were learning algebra. Save it - I get it - you made a lot back then. Then it was mismanaged out of your hands. Finally, you've got the train back on the tracks. Kudos. Only problem is, you've talked down to the industry the whole time, without any reason for doing so - other than your inflated egos.

Heavy lifting? Is that was 4-8-3-3 is to you?
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 09:40 AM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
More form 4 data:
SWA revenue 2013 = $17.69 billion / fleet size = $29.63 million, revenue per plane
DAL revenue 2013 = $37.77 billion / fleet size = $50.83 million, revenue per plane

The numbers speak for themselves guys!
I think you're forgetting about a few hundred RJs there...
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 09:59 AM
  #86  
mike734's Avatar
New boss = Old boss
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 1
From: Ca B737
Default

Originally Posted by FuriousG
I think you're forgetting about a few hundred RJs there...
Don't try and use critical thinking on Mesabah. He's got it all figured out.
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 10:26 AM
  #87  
Joliet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Shiny One
Default

If the regionals do the majority of domestic flying, by departures, why do we permit mainline pilots to occupy our jumpseats while they continue to get raises and profit in cooperation with management to keep costs low and not fight to reign in scope and brand for more than half of domestic pilots? I mean if a mainline guy gets denied off a Commutair flight he can go cry into a bag of money, right?
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 10:33 AM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

Brilliant!

Originally Posted by Joliet
If the regionals do the majority of domestic flying, by departures, why do we permit mainline pilots to occupy our jumpseats while they continue to get raises and profit in cooperation with management to keep costs low and not fight to reign in scope and brand for more than half of domestic pilots? I mean if a mainline guy gets denied off a Commutair flight he can go cry into a bag of money, right?
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 10:33 AM
  #89  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
Don't try and use critical thinking on Mesabah. He's got it all figured out.
I would consider your argument if you actually posted any data, but I'm the only one doing that apparently.
Reply
Old 06-25-2014 | 10:42 AM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

With the butthurt going on here, one would think that no endeavor pilot's were getting hired. Seems not to be the case.

Copied from another thread.

Few stats through the end of next month.

576 through July including 105 return to work guys

60/40 Civilian to Military
45% Endeavor
30% Compass
12% Expressjet

569 New Captains since C2012.

72 a month ongoing
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GW258
Mergers and Acquisitions
270
09-30-2012 07:48 AM
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM
R1200RT
Major
1
07-23-2009 11:07 AM
CE750
Major
103
03-29-2008 05:32 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices