Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Foreign airlines may save regional pilots (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/82234-foreign-airlines-may-save-regional-pilots.html)

tom11011 06-22-2014 09:51 AM


Originally Posted by Waitingformins (Post 1669722)
It’s not horsesh*t, a friend of mine loaded barges and ships for a top oil company, he always talked about the degenerates that worked those decks, constantly smelled like booze, stumbling around drunk, they would never have anybody that spoke English. They showed up with ships that were so rusty he could see through them. He refused to load several times due to the shape the equipment was in. The flag of convenience all started because of American shipping punitive liability cost, so the remedy is now if the ship leaks just don’t report it, IF it washes up on shore they’d never know who to blame. If they do catch us, O well surrender the ship and start over, good thing it’s registered in Liberia, less liability.



How would you feel about flying equipment so terrible that the FBO refused to fuel you, and you had to cancel the flight? Then the FBO would make the FSDO show up to do an airworthiness inspection so they could load you? Talk to the Coast Guard happens all the time with shipping. Have you ever flown a plane that was registered in Liberia and maintained under their law? What about a Liberian approved repair to the wing spar?

What I'm trying to get you to lay out is an example of how you see this would unfold in the US Airlines. Are you saying that because of the competition that a US based legacy carrier would be forced out of business and a foreign carrier would move in with foreign pilots? Or are you saying the big legacy carrier continues to exist but has no US based pilots?

I'm asking you and a few others who have commented to explain it in a scenario but all I get is comments like "lookup maritime" or "review past history" or "I don't have the time to explain it" kinds of answers.

Waitingformins 06-22-2014 10:02 AM


Originally Posted by DD214 (Post 1669146)
Hate it all you want but this is Capitlism and is how a free market society suppose to function. Let the market decide.

Can you please explain how BK protection is part of that "free market"?

Mesabah 06-22-2014 10:02 AM

The problem with NAI is they are trying to bring the Southwest effect to the international flying scene. We all know that SWA has had a very disruptive effect on the US airline industry.

hemaybedid 06-22-2014 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by Datsun (Post 1669548)
Understood. Thank you!

His number he originally gave was "total compensation", which means he was adding in health care and retirement etc.

80ktsClamp 06-22-2014 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by slats fail (Post 1669650)
I think both sides make valid points here but its pretty ironic to see a bunch of mainline guys railing against this but be perfectly ok with the much bigger scam known as the regional whipsaw. I certainly don't supprt what NAI is trying to accomplish, but I can certainly can understand someone's reason for supporting it.
NAI must be defeated, and when it is we need to focus our energy on defeating the regional whipsaw. The real downward pressure on wages are the regional airlines masquerading as Delta Connection, United Express, and American Eagle, who now do approximately 50% of the domestic flying.
We are not entitled to mainline jobs, we've just been doing the job flying delta passengers in the same weather same airspace same airports, same same same for FAR LESS PAY. But dbags like MEmbrain have the nerve to say things like it has to be earned. We have earned it, we prove it everyday by flying YOUR passengers. Tell that to the 20 year Comair guy whose been forced to start over at the bottom of some other ****ball regional. We all want to earn our jobs at mainline, but stop telling guys who've been in the regionals for a decade or more after being whipsawed they've got to earn it. We get it. We need to pass an interview like everyone else, but stop acting like we don't do the exact same job.
I think congress should be addressing the issue of subcontractors impersonating real airlines. Should be illegal. If Delta sells tickets on a Delta flight, it should be flown on a Delta plane by Delta pilots period. Take the flying back!

Where has any one of the mainline pilots that have posted on here showed support of the regional scheme? Point out specific posts, please. (MEMbrain is a troll that is on very thin ice, FWIW.)

A lot of the pain in the regional world right now is being caused by DL pilots taking regional flying back while mgmt is trying to protect their cost model to keep it viable just a little bit longer. It's not a fast process, nor is it without breaking some eggs. Guys really screwed the pooch years ago when they let the camel in the tent with the outsourcing model, and it will take many years to fix as well.

So why would we even begin to think that letting this even bigger camel in is a good idea and not without dire consequences?

Waitingformins 06-22-2014 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by tom11011 (Post 1669726)
What I'm trying to get you to lay out is an example of how you see this would unfold in the US Airlines. Are you saying that because of the competition that a US based legacy carrier would be forced out of business and a foreign carrier would move in with foreign pilots? Or are you saying the big legacy carrier continues to exist but has no US based pilots?

I'm asking you and a few others who have commented to explain it in a scenario but all I get is comments like "lookup maritime" or "review past history" or "I don't have the time to explain it" kinds of answers.

Its because their beating you to the punch. The business model, or labor model is moot. No one thinks FoC means that company wont make money. A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.

What would happen is NAI or some other company would run the most traveled routes. Abuse the design limits ie overload, remove safety equipment, have 1 flight attendant, add seats, run to many cycles on engine and airframe, paint over cracks, feed everyone MREs so they become constipated, remove the bathrooms, add seats, allow seat sharing, remove seats for standing fares, use counterfeit parts, haul hazardous cargo labeled non-hazardous, get behind on paying landing fees and PFC's, force FAA and airports to sue to collect, force flight crew to work 18 days and pad logs, issue no-doze to pilots, not waste training time on pilots for emergencys that wont happen, evade basic corporate taxes, offer IPO and dump shares, parade topless FAs in business class, offer prostitution in 1st class w/ cocaine.

Announce that big greedy unions wanting $250,000 a year are the reason that American company's failed, and reference rust belt and UAW.

CBreezy 06-22-2014 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by Waitingformins (Post 1669744)
Its because their beating you to the punch. The business model, or labor model is moot. No one thinks FoC means that company wont make money. A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.

What would happen is NAI or some other company would run the most traveled routes. Abuse the design limits ie overload, remove safety equipment, have 1 flight attendant, add seats, run to many cycles on engine and airframe, paint over cracks, feed everyone MREs so they become constipated, remove the bathrooms, add seats, allow seat sharing, remove seats for standing fares, use counterfeit parts, haul hazardous cargo labeled non-hazardous, get behind on paying landing fees and PFC's, force FAA and airports to sue to collect, force flight crew to work 18 days and pad logs, issue no-doze to pilots, not waste training time on pilots for emergencys that wont happen, evade basic corporate taxes, offer IPO and dump shares, parade topless FAs in business class, offer prostitution in 1st class w/ cocaine.

Announce that big greedy unions wanting $250,000 a year are the reason that American company's failed, and reference rust belt and UAW.

I think what people also fail to see is the long-term threat. An airline that is allowed to run the most popular routes will quickly run its competition out of business. A US-based airline is incapable of competeting with 3rd world wages and $100 trans-Atlantic fares. If you do the math, this is unsustainable for any airline. The American Consumer is too short-sighted to recognize that once FoC airlines manage to destroy the American aviation industry, they can charge whatever they like and/or offer wages as low as they want. I have no problem with Emirates or any other airline that has fair labor practices.

I will go back to a post someone else had regarding "$100 fares being what the consumer wants." This is a silly counterpoint. The consumer wants $0 fares. Does that mean airlines should offer free flights for all?

Flyhayes 06-22-2014 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by Waitingformins (Post 1669744)
.... A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.

From what I understand (I could be wrong), there are many foreign airlines that aren't allowed to operate in U.S. airspace due to their safety standards. Which makes that a moot point.

sulkair 06-22-2014 03:04 PM


Originally Posted by slats fail (Post 1669650)
I think both sides make valid points here but its pretty ironic to see a bunch of mainline guys railing against this but be perfectly ok with the much bigger scam known as the regional whipsaw. I certainly don't supprt what NAI is trying to accomplish, but I can certainly can understand someone's reason for supporting it.
NAI must be defeated, and when it is we need to focus our energy on defeating the regional whipsaw. The real downward pressure on wages are the regional airlines masquerading as Delta Connection, United Express, and American Eagle, who now do approximately 50% of the domestic flying.
We are not entitled to mainline jobs, we've just been doing the job flying delta passengers in the same weather same airspace same airports, same same same for FAR LESS PAY. But dbags like MEmbrain have the nerve to say things like it has to be earned. We have earned it, we prove it everyday by flying YOUR passengers. Tell that to the 20 year Comair guy whose been forced to start over at the bottom of some other ****ball regional. We all want to earn our jobs at mainline, but stop telling guys who've been in the regionals for a decade or more after being whipsawed they've got to earn it. We get it. We need to pass an interview like everyone else, but stop acting like we don't do the exact same job.
I think congress should be addressing the issue of subcontractors impersonating real airlines. Should be illegal. If Delta sells tickets on a Delta flight, it should be flown on a Delta plane by Delta pilots period. Take the flying back!

slats fail, very well put! Every single word!

Grumpyaviator 06-22-2014 03:05 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1669513)
You're paid like that because that's the price to go over there and do that.

Does anyone here really think that they will benevolently pay glorious wages in the states out of the good of their hearts? You'd better not.

All it would do is force the bar even lower were they to be allowed in here.

They'll pay what it takes to get pilots. If pilots will work for peanuts they'll pay peanuts. If pilots won't, they'll have to match the major, or better.

The staffing situation gives pilots the advantage right now.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands