Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Foreign airlines may save regional pilots >

Foreign airlines may save regional pilots

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Foreign airlines may save regional pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2014 | 09:51 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,154
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
It’s not horsesh*t, a friend of mine loaded barges and ships for a top oil company, he always talked about the degenerates that worked those decks, constantly smelled like booze, stumbling around drunk, they would never have anybody that spoke English. They showed up with ships that were so rusty he could see through them. He refused to load several times due to the shape the equipment was in. The flag of convenience all started because of American shipping punitive liability cost, so the remedy is now if the ship leaks just don’t report it, IF it washes up on shore they’d never know who to blame. If they do catch us, O well surrender the ship and start over, good thing it’s registered in Liberia, less liability.



How would you feel about flying equipment so terrible that the FBO refused to fuel you, and you had to cancel the flight? Then the FBO would make the FSDO show up to do an airworthiness inspection so they could load you? Talk to the Coast Guard happens all the time with shipping. Have you ever flown a plane that was registered in Liberia and maintained under their law? What about a Liberian approved repair to the wing spar?
What I'm trying to get you to lay out is an example of how you see this would unfold in the US Airlines. Are you saying that because of the competition that a US based legacy carrier would be forced out of business and a foreign carrier would move in with foreign pilots? Or are you saying the big legacy carrier continues to exist but has no US based pilots?

I'm asking you and a few others who have commented to explain it in a scenario but all I get is comments like "lookup maritime" or "review past history" or "I don't have the time to explain it" kinds of answers.
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 10:02 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DD214
Hate it all you want but this is Capitlism and is how a free market society suppose to function. Let the market decide.
Can you please explain how BK protection is part of that "free market"?
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 10:02 AM
  #93  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

The problem with NAI is they are trying to bring the Southwest effect to the international flying scene. We all know that SWA has had a very disruptive effect on the US airline industry.
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 10:06 AM
  #94  
hemaybedid's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Datsun
Understood. Thank you!
His number he originally gave was "total compensation", which means he was adding in health care and retirement etc.
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #95  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by slats fail
I think both sides make valid points here but its pretty ironic to see a bunch of mainline guys railing against this but be perfectly ok with the much bigger scam known as the regional whipsaw. I certainly don't supprt what NAI is trying to accomplish, but I can certainly can understand someone's reason for supporting it.
NAI must be defeated, and when it is we need to focus our energy on defeating the regional whipsaw. The real downward pressure on wages are the regional airlines masquerading as Delta Connection, United Express, and American Eagle, who now do approximately 50% of the domestic flying.
We are not entitled to mainline jobs, we've just been doing the job flying delta passengers in the same weather same airspace same airports, same same same for FAR LESS PAY. But dbags like MEmbrain have the nerve to say things like it has to be earned. We have earned it, we prove it everyday by flying YOUR passengers. Tell that to the 20 year Comair guy whose been forced to start over at the bottom of some other ****ball regional. We all want to earn our jobs at mainline, but stop telling guys who've been in the regionals for a decade or more after being whipsawed they've got to earn it. We get it. We need to pass an interview like everyone else, but stop acting like we don't do the exact same job.
I think congress should be addressing the issue of subcontractors impersonating real airlines. Should be illegal. If Delta sells tickets on a Delta flight, it should be flown on a Delta plane by Delta pilots period. Take the flying back!
Where has any one of the mainline pilots that have posted on here showed support of the regional scheme? Point out specific posts, please. (MEMbrain is a troll that is on very thin ice, FWIW.)

A lot of the pain in the regional world right now is being caused by DL pilots taking regional flying back while mgmt is trying to protect their cost model to keep it viable just a little bit longer. It's not a fast process, nor is it without breaking some eggs. Guys really screwed the pooch years ago when they let the camel in the tent with the outsourcing model, and it will take many years to fix as well.

So why would we even begin to think that letting this even bigger camel in is a good idea and not without dire consequences?
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
What I'm trying to get you to lay out is an example of how you see this would unfold in the US Airlines. Are you saying that because of the competition that a US based legacy carrier would be forced out of business and a foreign carrier would move in with foreign pilots? Or are you saying the big legacy carrier continues to exist but has no US based pilots?

I'm asking you and a few others who have commented to explain it in a scenario but all I get is comments like "lookup maritime" or "review past history" or "I don't have the time to explain it" kinds of answers.
Its because their beating you to the punch. The business model, or labor model is moot. No one thinks FoC means that company wont make money. A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.

What would happen is NAI or some other company would run the most traveled routes. Abuse the design limits ie overload, remove safety equipment, have 1 flight attendant, add seats, run to many cycles on engine and airframe, paint over cracks, feed everyone MREs so they become constipated, remove the bathrooms, add seats, allow seat sharing, remove seats for standing fares, use counterfeit parts, haul hazardous cargo labeled non-hazardous, get behind on paying landing fees and PFC's, force FAA and airports to sue to collect, force flight crew to work 18 days and pad logs, issue no-doze to pilots, not waste training time on pilots for emergencys that wont happen, evade basic corporate taxes, offer IPO and dump shares, parade topless FAs in business class, offer prostitution in 1st class w/ cocaine.

Announce that big greedy unions wanting $250,000 a year are the reason that American company's failed, and reference rust belt and UAW.
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 11:56 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,533
Likes: 1,129
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Its because their beating you to the punch. The business model, or labor model is moot. No one thinks FoC means that company wont make money. A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.

What would happen is NAI or some other company would run the most traveled routes. Abuse the design limits ie overload, remove safety equipment, have 1 flight attendant, add seats, run to many cycles on engine and airframe, paint over cracks, feed everyone MREs so they become constipated, remove the bathrooms, add seats, allow seat sharing, remove seats for standing fares, use counterfeit parts, haul hazardous cargo labeled non-hazardous, get behind on paying landing fees and PFC's, force FAA and airports to sue to collect, force flight crew to work 18 days and pad logs, issue no-doze to pilots, not waste training time on pilots for emergencys that wont happen, evade basic corporate taxes, offer IPO and dump shares, parade topless FAs in business class, offer prostitution in 1st class w/ cocaine.

Announce that big greedy unions wanting $250,000 a year are the reason that American company's failed, and reference rust belt and UAW.
I think what people also fail to see is the long-term threat. An airline that is allowed to run the most popular routes will quickly run its competition out of business. A US-based airline is incapable of competeting with 3rd world wages and $100 trans-Atlantic fares. If you do the math, this is unsustainable for any airline. The American Consumer is too short-sighted to recognize that once FoC airlines manage to destroy the American aviation industry, they can charge whatever they like and/or offer wages as low as they want. I have no problem with Emirates or any other airline that has fair labor practices.

I will go back to a post someone else had regarding "$100 fares being what the consumer wants." This is a silly counterpoint. The consumer wants $0 fares. Does that mean airlines should offer free flights for all?
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 01:38 PM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
.... A FoC means 3rd world safety standards in this country with no control. That above all is the larger risk.
From what I understand (I could be wrong), there are many foreign airlines that aren't allowed to operate in U.S. airspace due to their safety standards. Which makes that a moot point.
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 03:04 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slats fail
I think both sides make valid points here but its pretty ironic to see a bunch of mainline guys railing against this but be perfectly ok with the much bigger scam known as the regional whipsaw. I certainly don't supprt what NAI is trying to accomplish, but I can certainly can understand someone's reason for supporting it.
NAI must be defeated, and when it is we need to focus our energy on defeating the regional whipsaw. The real downward pressure on wages are the regional airlines masquerading as Delta Connection, United Express, and American Eagle, who now do approximately 50% of the domestic flying.
We are not entitled to mainline jobs, we've just been doing the job flying delta passengers in the same weather same airspace same airports, same same same for FAR LESS PAY. But dbags like MEmbrain have the nerve to say things like it has to be earned. We have earned it, we prove it everyday by flying YOUR passengers. Tell that to the 20 year Comair guy whose been forced to start over at the bottom of some other ****ball regional. We all want to earn our jobs at mainline, but stop telling guys who've been in the regionals for a decade or more after being whipsawed they've got to earn it. We get it. We need to pass an interview like everyone else, but stop acting like we don't do the exact same job.
I think congress should be addressing the issue of subcontractors impersonating real airlines. Should be illegal. If Delta sells tickets on a Delta flight, it should be flown on a Delta plane by Delta pilots period. Take the flying back!
slats fail, very well put! Every single word!
Reply
Old 06-22-2014 | 03:05 PM
  #100  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You're paid like that because that's the price to go over there and do that.

Does anyone here really think that they will benevolently pay glorious wages in the states out of the good of their hearts? You'd better not.

All it would do is force the bar even lower were they to be allowed in here.
They'll pay what it takes to get pilots. If pilots will work for peanuts they'll pay peanuts. If pilots won't, they'll have to match the major, or better.

The staffing situation gives pilots the advantage right now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
WARich
Delta
11229
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
easyflyer
FedEx
1248
05-24-2016 09:38 AM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices