Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ASA MEC update regarding XJT MEC >

ASA MEC update regarding XJT MEC

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ASA MEC update regarding XJT MEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2014, 01:43 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by AnchorDown View Post
Quote:





Originally Posted by Nevets


You would be voting in concessions for 2/3 of our pilots just to help shut us down and you get to live another day. That's worse than PSAing us. But like I said, I'll gladly take that sword instead of stooping to that level.




Good, cant help you dude. I got to do what's best for my pilot group, not yours. Our pilots will still not take a pay cut to do the same job and I'm certainly not falling on a sword for you. You want to call it PSA? I don't care. You're Comair. Seeya.

AnchorDown
Like I said, I commend you for at least admitting to your tactics even though both MECs have already previously agreed to a process to get to one PBS. But go ahead and Comair us and stand proud side by side with the likes of PSA and the original Freedom and gojets.

Originally Posted by Bartender View Post
ASA pilots have grown tired of the XJT children and are going to do what is in their best interests.
Why? Just because the ASA MEC doesn't want to use the process both MECs have already previously agreed to in order to get to one PBS system?
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 01:50 PM
  #22  
Holding
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
To me it seems like a very small bone to throw to the side who is taking the brunt of the concessions management wants us to take.
Nevets, if you think that the selection of a PBS vendor is a "small bone" to be thrown around like a parting gift, then you need to solicit input from PBS-using pilots at several different airlines and listen real good! I'll tell you to be very wary of any globalized or optimized solution. Just as important, make sure that you have crystal clear language regarding parameters, premium pay, pairing construction, and transparency in any accompanying contract language.
fastback is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 02:27 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 360
Default

"outdated airframes on an outdated contract with an outdated mentality."
Jefferson is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:07 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
"outdated airframes on an outdated contract with an outdated mentality."
just wanted to add, "and no money."

AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:29 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: The one that holds the thingy that moves the doo-hickie, and keeps the other thing from falling down
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
Our contract is not a money loser. The CPA that management negotiated is the money loser. But go ahead and PSA us if you want. I'm fine with not being part of a pilot group associated with those tactics. I'll gladly fall on my sword if it comes to that. You can have your PSA type tactics.
well said, been talking like for years.
krisma is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:39 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by fastback View Post
Quote:





Originally Posted by Nevets


To me it seems like a very small bone to throw to the side who is taking the brunt of the concessions management wants us to take.




Nevets, if you think that the selection of a PBS vendor is a "small bone" to be thrown around like a parting gift, then you need to solicit input from PBS-using pilots at several different airlines and listen real good! I'll tell you to be very wary of any globalized or optimized solution. Just as important, make sure that you have crystal clear language regarding parameters, premium pay, pairing construction, and transparency in any accompanying contract language.
I dont disagree. But in comparison to the laundry list of concessions that management wants from the ERJ side, a process (which has been previously agreed to by both MEC) to choose a single PBS is just a bone.

Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
"outdated airframes on an outdated contract with an outdated mentality."
Fifty seat jets are outdated. What's your point? And why is our contract outdated? Because it's the best in the industry? Do you guys even listen to what you say? Or are you management? Because you are saying EXACTLY the same things!

Originally Posted by AnchorDown View Post
Quote:





Originally Posted by Jefferson


"outdated airframes on an outdated contract with an outdated mentality."




just wanted to add, "and no money."

AnchorDown
This is absurd! As long as management is paying for two sets of management personnel, two sets of office staff, two sets of facilities for SOC, two sets of systems management, two sets of EVERYTHING, there will always be money on the table! Why should we sacrifice money out of our compensation so that management can spend it on two VPs of everything?! And for what? So that they can perpetuate this whipsaw?

You guys are talking crazy.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:55 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 239
Default

Where did ASA break the PBS process agreement? Comair had the best in the industry too, which is how you got your 2004 Contract, how they doin?

Hey don't worry, I'll be sure to mention you after you've fallen on your sword. Can't wait really. You'll be the greatest pilot martyr of all time.


AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:59 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by AnchorDown View Post
Where did ASA break the PBS process agreement? Comair had the best in the industry too, which is how you got your 2004 Contract, how they doin?

Hey don't worry, I'll be sure to mention you after you've fallen on your sword. Can't wait really. You'll be the greatest pilot martyr of all time.


AnchorDown
You can't wait for LXJT to fall on a sword. How about you just vote yes or no, and stop wishing harm on other pilots. I know you're the small minority that thinks that way but it's sad to read.
flyguy94 is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 04:07 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy94 View Post
You can't wait for LXJT to fall on a sword. How about you just vote yes or no, and stop wishing harm on other pilots. I know you're the small minority that thinks that way but it's sad to read.
I didn't know I was God? Thank you. Whatever I wish, guess what? I have no control over. You want me to stop wishing nevets fall on his sword? Cuz that's who I'm talking to. Didn't know I was in a conversation with you?

AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 05:08 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: The right seat
Posts: 257
Default

After readng the thread about this on the pipe, I believe there is NO way this merger can work. One of the ASA guys stated his/her opinion on flightline and all the name calling and bashing of him/her is pathetic. If that is an adequate representation of that pilot group then I want nothing to do with them!
TheBlueBaron is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ135
Regional
61
05-28-2013 07:33 AM
NoHandHold
ExpressJet
78
04-01-2013 01:47 PM
dinodriver
Cargo
20
02-25-2012 09:33 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
112
11-07-2010 01:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices