Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule? >

What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What is the purpose of the 1,500 hour rule?

Old 09-26-2014 | 02:15 PM
  #51  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The "tail stall" theory is absolute and utter BS and anyone with the slightest aviation clue knows it. I'd be astounded if either of those two had the remotest idea as to what a tall stall is, much less what to do about it.

She had a gut reaction because something bad happened after she lowered the flaps, so she instinctively raised them to "fix" the problem. No way would she have completed the necessary logical leaps to diagnose a tail stall without discussing it with the CA or at least verbalizing what she was doing.
I tend to agree with you.

It needs to be known that that she did was eerily similar to crew room banter in regard to tail stalls that I had heard at Pinnacle the winter prior to the CJC accident.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 03:49 PM
  #52  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash
3407 was not a question of judgement. It was a pilot who pulled the yoke into his gut when the stall warning system went off and then held it there.

That is EXACTLY what some time spent in a non-airline enviroment would have not taught him not to do -- no matter how little sleep he had. In fact "taught" is a poor word, "burned into his soul" would be a better term.

We are a product of our experiance, and that experiance should be deeper than a mud puddle when step into our first 121 job.
He did not hold the yoke back! He got the shaker and added about 15% power. He got the pusher and he fought the pusher 3 separate times. He also never increased the power over 60%..... The Q400 would have very easily powered out of the stall had he just went to max power, but we all know how it ended.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 03:51 PM
  #53  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Holy political debate on APC Batman!!!!

You guys just got to learn to chill out. First off I never said I hated the 1,500 hr. rule, just wanted clarification. Secondly, I never went to ATP nor plan on going for that matter. Thirdly, I don't have 200K in student debt. I have no idea how some of you came to that conclusion.

For those that don't like this thread, guess what? You actually don't have to post anything and it will go to the bottom of the forum. By posting you create more traffic and therefore more views on this thread keeping it on the 1st page of the forum longer. So...congratulations, you shot yourself on the foot on that one. I really thought there would be more professionalism on forum sites like this...

For those that actually answered the question sincerely, I thank you! I appreciate your feedback.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 04:13 PM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
He did not hold the yoke back! He got the shaker and added about 15% power. He got the pusher and he fought the pusher 3 separate times. He also never increased the power over 60%..... The Q400 would have very easily powered out of the stall had he just went to max power, but we all know how it ended.
Good point I think it needs to also be explained that the biggest mistake before the stall and what some will say poor airmanship was the pilots lack of understanding how the Ice speed switch work. For the q400 when the airplane was in icing conditions the crew was required to put a switch on that increased the speed that one would get the stall indication. When one had this switch on they were also required to increase the vref speeds by 20 knots also. The crew had the wrongs speeds set. The crew was on profile flying the aircraft like they should be but because the switch was on got the stall indication at a higher speed so he was not ready and his lack of readies is what led to the unfortunate incident. What is not really mentioned is that this very same situation happen the very next day after the crash where the crew forgot that the speed switch was on and bug the wrongs speeds and got the stick shaker but lucky a check airman was on board in the jump seat. The 1500 hour rule just like far 117 would not have prevented the crash. You still have pilots commuting across the country for work, you still have people sleeping in crew rooms what has change nothing. The only airline that has do e anything to make sure their pilots are well rested before a trip is commute air who gives people hotels the night before a trip.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 04:46 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
to me, that sounds like a guy shutting down the left engine with a right engine fire and then saying "that sounds correct for a left engine fire could have just been a misdiagnosis"
That just explains your level of knowledge. I hope you never get a tail stall. There is a good chance you have never heard of one.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 04:49 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptUnderhill
Holy political debate on APC Batman!!!!

You guys just got to learn to chill out. First off I never said I hated the 1,500 hr. rule, just wanted clarification. Secondly, I never went to ATP nor plan on going for that matter. Thirdly, I don't have 200K in student debt. I have no idea how some of you came to that conclusion.

For those that don't like this thread, guess what? You actually don't have to post anything and it will go to the bottom of the forum. By posting you create more traffic and therefore more views on this thread keeping it on the 1st page of the forum longer. So...congratulations, you shot yourself on the foot on that one. I really thought there would be more professionalism on forum sites like this...

For those that actually answered the question sincerely, I thank you! I appreciate your feedback.
Well now you know why when people talk about one seniority list you know why that'll never happen. Pilots can't even have a discussion about the 1500hr rule without tearing each other apart, lol.

Regardless whether someone supports or hates the 1500hr rule it has not raised pay. That in the end is all that matters. Pilots can care about experience and all that, but the public really doesn't. If they did they would be willing to pay alot more for tickets to increase your pay.

It sure doesn't help that the TSA goes around groping people making the flying experience fun <sarcasm>. Security groping, grumpy FA's and Airlines nickel and diming passengers to death make for a customer base that has no desire to help fuel your desire to make a liveable wage as a pilot.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 05:07 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 297
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ClarenceOver
As others have said, 1500 is no big deal, two years as a CFI and you'll have some fun too.

You better believe its a big deal when you need 500 HOURS CROSS COUNTRY. You aren't going to have a mere 1500 hours with 500 hours cross country as a cfi. You could easily end up with 3 or 4 thousand hours while you are losing seniority at mesa and psa by 50 pilots a month. Have fun with that.
You do realize the new rules allow for a restricted atp with 200 hours cross country, right? Reaching 200 with 1500 tt as an instructor shouldn't be a problem.
Reply
Old 09-27-2014 | 04:54 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

The purpose of the 1500 hour rule was to kill Gulfstream and the "0 time to Airline pilot in 12 months" puppy mills.
Reply
Old 09-27-2014 | 05:20 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Karma
That just explains your level of knowledge. I hope you never get a tail stall. There is a good chance you have never heard of one.

No, oh wise experienced one, please explain it to me then explain how a misdiagnosis is a legit excuse for a crash….
Reply
Old 09-27-2014 | 06:57 AM
  #60  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by USMCmech
The purpose of the 1500 hour rule was to kill Gulfstream and the "0 time to Airline pilot in 12 months" puppy mills.
That wasn't the purpose, although it may be a consequence. GL and GIA may be done, but I doubt the puppy mills are going anywhere, they'll still be able to suck enough people in. They'll offer CFI jobs to their grads (at least one hour/month guaranteed!) and zero-to-ATP time building programs for the well-heeled. The good news is that while starry-eyed wannabe skygods would instantly sign up for the $180K loan needed to go direct from zero to regional FO, no lender in his right mind would go for that, so the latter option will be available only if daddy can cover down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
118
02-03-2014 10:11 AM
172 Captain
Regional
35
12-14-2012 08:30 AM
VIIPILOT
Regional
266
05-08-2012 05:48 AM
resetjet
Major
151
04-27-2011 11:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices