Who will be the lucky winner for delta flying
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Just look at my username as one of many examples of the superior dispatch reliability and performance of the 700/900 versus the 200

Overall, though, you're right--all CRJs leave a bit to be desired. I'm becoming acutely aware of that as I start studying for E175 upgrade at Mesa. Can you say "Flight Level Change"???
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
That's cool....a year 3 Mesa captain is making as much as me as a year 4 FO. Way to go!
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Who ever it is, they won't be cheaper then 9E. So the real question is, why is DAL willing to spend a little extra now for foreseeable extra revenue at a later date? My best guess is to trim the fat at 9E and get someone to fly these worthless tin cans at a contract that can easily cancelled. With all 200's gone, DAL and 9E can streamline and expedite 900 training for a better position going into 2015-2016 flying. Not saying 9E is going to get more planes, just saying it will better to manage routes and scheduling with one type of aircraft. Although flexibility going into different markets will be reduced, it must be DAL plan of sending 9E into normally high capacity routes with less frequency i.e. New York. If they can fill the gap in high demand time slots for business travelers, they can complete with LCC's operating up and down the east coast simply because they have a low cost regional model.
I always see everyone talking about mainline whipsawing regionals around to lower cost, which they have accomplished at 9E...Rock Bottom. Investors don't care much about expense cutting as they do revenue growth. One way (of many) is to capture market share in a growing market with your own low cost model and see if it works. If it doesn't, BYE BYE 9E. Just my take...if your company gets the 200's, consider it a curse rather than blessing because you are not part of the long term business plan at DAL...just a pawn in the chess match.
I always see everyone talking about mainline whipsawing regionals around to lower cost, which they have accomplished at 9E...Rock Bottom. Investors don't care much about expense cutting as they do revenue growth. One way (of many) is to capture market share in a growing market with your own low cost model and see if it works. If it doesn't, BYE BYE 9E. Just my take...if your company gets the 200's, consider it a curse rather than blessing because you are not part of the long term business plan at DAL...just a pawn in the chess match.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Well it definitely isn't express jets. I wonder if the powers that be at Delta read these forums? If they do I bet it provides for some very good laughter over there. Some of these post are way out there.
Last edited by gojo; 10-06-2014 at 04:04 AM.
#57
Just look at my username as one of many examples of the superior dispatch reliability and performance of the 700/900 versus the 200

Overall, though, you're right--all CRJs leave a bit to be desired. I'm becoming acutely aware of that as I start studying for E175 upgrade at Mesa. Can you say "Flight Level Change"???
You'll find out soon enough that this mighty E-180 isn't what you guys have built it up to be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



