![]() |
So what airlines are currently filling classes with no problems? PSA and TSA? Compass ?Is that it?
|
The funny thing about 1st year pay is that it used to make sense.. when that job was going to some fresh CPL with 300hrs.. but that is no longer the case.
Now Airlines are required to hire more experienced candidates than before, but the rest of the seniority isn't voting for better 1st year pay! Since they "suffered through it, you can handle it too" is the attitude. What just doesn't make sense is the same disparity in 1st year pay at the Majors.. to Pay back the company for training? |
Originally Posted by tinman1
(Post 1784635)
Not true. I worked at two different flight schools with a heavy amount of Chinese contracts and all of those students got a second class when they came over here.
|
Originally Posted by Cosgr
(Post 1784757)
That is false. I worked for a large 141 school with 99% foreign students. They all had third class medicals.
|
I worked for a small 141 school (about 80 or so) that taught predominately Chinese students. All students required a First Class medical. Take it for what you will.
|
Yeah, we used to tell any student thinking about going to an airline to get a first.
|
Originally Posted by Cubdriver
(Post 1784539)
I'm not selling, I'm telling. Those are facts up there, not my personal opinion. If you prefer a recruiter's sales pitch to the facts then be my guest and pitch the sale for them- but you will be factually wrong.
|
Originally Posted by NewPil0t
(Post 1784767)
The funny thing about 1st year pay is that it used to make sense.. when that job was going to some fresh CPL with 300hrs.. but that is no longer the case.
Now Airlines are required to hire more experienced candidates than before, but the rest of the seniority isn't voting for better 1st year pay! Since they "suffered through it, you can handle it too" is the attitude. What just doesn't make sense is the same disparity in 1st year pay at the Majors.. to Pay back the company for training? |
Originally Posted by NewPil0t
(Post 1784767)
The funny thing about 1st year pay is that it used to make sense.. when that job was going to some fresh CPL with 300hrs.. but that is no longer the case.
Now Airlines are required to hire more experienced candidates than before, but the rest of the seniority isn't voting for better 1st year pay! Since they "suffered through it, you can handle it too" is the attitude. What just doesn't make sense is the same disparity in 1st year pay at the Majors.. to Pay back the company for training? 1) The company doesn't want to pay. Ever. If they could get the first year to be an internship, they would. 2) Most unions don't value first year pay very highly. It's short-lived, and pilots will spend much more time on other years of the payscale. They'd rather negotiate better pay later on, and so giving the company a low first-year rate doesn't use up any "bargaining chips" as it were. 3) The union wants the highest-top out possible. Your dues are paid as a percentage. 2% of 240 bucks is a lot more than 2% of $60. Since at many carriers there is a large segment of the pilot group that is topped-out, the union stands to gain much more by negotiating the highest rate possible for the step of the payscale that the largest number of pilots are on. A high first-year number looks good on paper, but doesn't really yield any benefits for the union, and may use up valuable bargaining power. This is the same reason that pay increases are usually negotiated as percentages. Flat dollar-amounts applied equally would be much more fair, but stretching the top of the scale pays more in the long run. |
Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
(Post 1784891)
The reality is the 300hr pilots from a good school were way better pilots than most of the 1500hr pilots we are getting now. IOE has become basic flight instruction and average oe hours is way up.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands