Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ATP Rule Change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2014, 10:50 PM
  #1  
Team Chemtrail
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: CRJ
Posts: 104
Default ATP Rule Change

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training rules implemented in wake of Flight 3407 - City & Region - The Buffalo News

Thoughts? Is it going to happen?
contrail44 is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 11:04 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Default

I'm sure they'll eventually change it, once the whole system that is currently in place collapses. That's usually how and when change occurs.
Da40Pilot is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 11:05 PM
  #3  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

The agency set up a committee earlier this year that will "develop and recommend to the FAA new or updated guidance material, notices, handbooks and other related materials for air-carrier training and qualification,” according to the committee’s charter, which the Flight 3407 families obtained and released Tuesday.
If the whole story is based on that sentence, all of this seems like a reach. It's too vague to be definitively saying anything about changing ATP requirements.

We need to make aviators more scarce, similar to doctors. A bigger barrier to entry will do that, and that's exactly what 1500 hours combined with increased training costs is. The free market will do its thing, and we should see pilot wages increase over years or decades. If they revoke 1500 (they won't, they'd do an MPL first), how about instead we establish a minimum pilot wage in light of the RLA neutering our negotiating abilities. Wishful thinking, I know.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 11:06 PM
  #4  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Also, just realized that article is from July. We haven't heard anything since, so...
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 04:40 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: DHC8
Posts: 151
Default

The ATP rule was directly dictated by congress, not the FAA.

It's a little harder than it looks to waive, but the MPL could happen.

Yet, it would still be 2+ years before the first MPL licensee would be ready.
NewPil0t is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 04:51 AM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 15
Default

Let's hope that it doesn't, and MPL would be a disaster.
kycfi85 is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 06:08 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Left seat of a Jet
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet View Post
If the whole story is based on that sentence, all of this seems like a reach. It's too vague to be definitively saying anything about changing ATP requirements.

We need to make aviators more scarce, similar to doctors. A bigger barrier to entry will do that, and that's exactly what 1500 hours combined with increased training costs is. The free market will do its thing, and we should see pilot wages increase over years or decades. If they revoke 1500 (they won't, they'd do an MPL first), how about instead we establish a minimum pilot wage in light of the RLA neutering our negotiating abilities. Wishful thinking, I know.

If wages ever increase you can expect the number of pilots needed on the property to decrease as well as benefits. This is one of the many reasons I will never assume the responsibilities of a chief pilot or dir. of ops. again anywhere. I am through being someone else's b...h!
bozobigtop is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 06:08 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Electra's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 178
Default

The FAA takes forever to do ANYTHING. They're afraid of technology ("untried, untested, unproven"), they focus-group everything, they put it out for comment, then ignore all the comments and take out all the good stuff and double-down on the bad. Then a new administration comes in and shakes up upper management and the whole process gets set back three years.

The current ATP rule will only change when congressional representatives are flooded with complaints from their constituents that service to their middle of nowhere town suddenly vanished for lack of pilots to fly there.
Electra is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 06:12 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Left seat of a Jet
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by NewPil0t View Post
The ATP rule was directly dictated by congress, not the FAA.

It's a little harder than it looks to waive, but the MPL could happen.

Yet, it would still be 2+ years before the first MPL licensee would be ready.

If you notice the only communities having trouble with reliable air service are small cities. I haven't heard too many large cities have any issues unless you desire to travel to hooterville. We will see how long congress allows this to continue!
bozobigtop is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 06:16 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: CL65
Posts: 955
Default

Originally Posted by bozobigtop View Post
If you notice the only communities having trouble with reliable air service are small cities. I haven't heard too many large cities have any issues unless you desire to travel to hooterville. We will see how long congress allows this to continue!
The problem is that there are thousands of small towns all cross the country being served with RJ's. It isn't the small towns that will complain, but rather the major airlines that no longer have thousands of people from those small towns on their flights. The RJ's bring the people to the hub's. That is how it works.

No RJ's=no wide bodies.
CLT Guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Duksrule
Career Questions
21
06-22-2012 05:32 PM
darby78
Cargo
61
08-13-2008 11:08 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
183
06-04-2007 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices