Bombardier sells 24 CRJ900 aircraft
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: PNF
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Im honestly not sure why DL keeps buying CRJ's... AA and UAL are buying Ejets left and right, pax love em, and they are less restrictive to certain airports...a CRJ will always be a CRJ no matter how long the tube is...
Last edited by djrogs03; 12-31-2014 at 07:06 PM.
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: 320 CA
Not anymore. They award so flying to Shuttle America earlier this month.
#14
#15
51-70 seat max of 102
71-76 sea max of 223, once Endeavor takes delivery of their last CR9 DAL will have 193 76 seaters in service. DAL will have to park 50 seaters due to the addition of the last 30 76 seaters above 193 and the ratio is very steep, i believe it's close to 1 to 4 ratio. I am not in the DCI system so I don't keep as much track, but the E170 awarded to RAH are likely to be capacity being moved around the system and not additional lift. The flying will come at the expense of someone else as I believe Delta is maxed out on the 51-70 seat range with 102 airframes.
Last edited by What; 01-01-2015 at 03:13 AM.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
Easy....fuel burn. From what I've seen, the CRJ burns less fuel than the ERJ does.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
They awarded E-170, that's a different seat range in the SCOPE section.
51-70 seat max of 102
71-76 sea max of 223, once Endeavor takes delivery of their last CR9 DAL will have 193 76 seaters in service. DAL will have to park 50 seaters due to the addition of the last 30 76 seaters above 193 and the ratio is very steep, i believe it's close to 1 to 4 ratio. I am not in the DCI system so I don't keep as much track, but the E170 awarded to RAH are likely to be capacity being moved around the system and not additional lift. The flying will come at the expense of someone else as I believe Delta is maxed out on the 51-70 seat range with 102 airframes.
51-70 seat max of 102
71-76 sea max of 223, once Endeavor takes delivery of their last CR9 DAL will have 193 76 seaters in service. DAL will have to park 50 seaters due to the addition of the last 30 76 seaters above 193 and the ratio is very steep, i believe it's close to 1 to 4 ratio. I am not in the DCI system so I don't keep as much track, but the E170 awarded to RAH are likely to be capacity being moved around the system and not additional lift. The flying will come at the expense of someone else as I believe Delta is maxed out on the 51-70 seat range with 102 airframes.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
From: Just another RJ guy
And we'd see a LOT more Q-400s flying around if it was all about fuel burn. I think Delta got a killer deal it couldn't refuse from Bombardier to buy all of those 900s. The Embraer is more expensive but there's a reason why. Pilots and passengers both say it's a better plane than the CRJ product.
#20
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Wouldn't a little diversity in the regional fleet be advantageous? Say an onerous AD targets the E-170/175 fleet, you can still have your CRJ fleet going strong and vice versa. Plus a major can use the competition between Bombardier and Embraer to get the best deal going forward? Yes, I realize Southwest and Alaska are single fleet types, but there have to be some disadvantages as well. And though the 175 is a nice ride, I don't think the -900 is *that* bad. Maybe that's just me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




