Bombardier sells 24 CRJ900 aircraft
#51
This! So far the best and closest to accurate post. The guy that opened this thread needs to relax. No need to getting all excited and bounce of the walls. Probably a PSA guy like the one opening a thread saying "psa announcing ord base" when in reality the article only indicates operation in ord as fly through but no actual base. Oh geez these psa guys spreading false rumors I'll tell ya
Just posting the news and watching the fireworks.
I don't give 2 $hitz.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
In the past week 9E twice has had to do fuel stops in BNA on both the JFK-SAT and JFK-DFW legs thanks to strong headwinds. I think at the LGA base there was a fuel stop included on the LGA-IAH leg too. Does seem the E-jet has a slight range advantage.
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
You're making the assumption that price tag is the sole issue an airline makes when purchasing an aircraft. If the Ejet benefits got outweighed by price, then you wouldn't see a mass purchasing of it across the industry. I'm sure you know exactly what DL management is thinking and considering with regards to aircraft purchases. Must be why you fly airplanes instead counting beans.

The fact remains there is no significant difference or advantage in getting the E jet over the larger CRJ's at this point for DL. But how could that be? The E Jet is this radically superior game changer and only those who have it can succeed?
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
One of the more persistant myths out there. DL and all large airlines cater to all travelers. A lot of so called "LCC's" fare structures are pretty shady bait and switch tactics. Doesn't one of them even charge a kings ransome for a paper boarding pass, which is required to board? LOL!
No airline the size of any legacy or anywhere close can survive by somply "catering to the business traveler". There aren't anywhere near enough business travelers to fill networks of that size; not even close.
Yet every so called "LCC" and every future ponzi scheme start up that comes along always tries to float the same lie. Hey, why not though? Airport boards keep buying it! LOL!
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
I think the biggest customer complain about the CRJs (and the 145) is the whole valet tagging of their rollerboards. Not only is it a pain in the ass sitting there on the jet bridge, exposed to the cold, but often it could mean the difference between making their connection or not. That shows how $$$ trumps all, including better customer service.

Some stations take forever to bring the valet bags up, and that is a PITA. Others are pretty fast about it though and when they do it right it works well. Either way though, that's hardly a game changer either. Its also nicer when the cabin runs out of room (which happens a LOT on every plane type from CRJ ro ERJ to Mainline) valet tagging is vastly superior to the "gate check" wormhole hoping you see it again on the other side, which is exctly what you get on the overhyped E Jet most of the time when its full, which is often.
Its not my intention to defend the CRJ series regional jets; there's nothing special about them and they aren't as good as mainline. They aren't even as good as the larger EMB's. But neither is the revolutionary game changer must have some people are trying to make them out to be. Some "RJ's" suck a little bit less than other RJ's. Big deal. There is clearly an advantage for DL to get some more CRJ's. Maybe its price maybe its staffing maybe its a long term chess move looking 5-10 years down the road with the upcoming "rate reset" and other contingencies. Who knows. Who cares. Watching the regional version of pilots fawning over their 757 (E170 series) is pretty entertaining though.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Where do you get this BS? We fly LGA-DFW all the time, and we don't stop for gas. We also flt DTW-MTY (Monterey MX, I'll spare you looking it up) in the winter. Over 1400 miles, full load and alternate, no fuel stop.
Do the pax really care if the FAs are inconvenienced? (They don't). Most DAL stations hold coach boarding until the 1st round is served anyhow. And I've seen this same problem on an MD88. Guess DAL should dump them too, lol?
Oh please! How often do you actually rely on a GPS approach to get in somewhere? I have been flying for and airline for 15 years and I can count on one hand how many times I've done an actual GPS approach in line flying. And it's always been into places like Dothan, Alabama or Fayetteville NC. Everywhere else you're flying an ILS, and Cat II is Cat II. Unless you've got an autoland, you're in the same boat as all the other RJs.
Please don't. I'm sure we're all impressed with your whopping 1500+ hours in both airframes (lateral move anyone?) but that doesn't make you an expert on route planning. I know you love your Big Shiny Real Jet With Engines Under The wings, but at the end of the day, it's still just an RJ.
Do the pax really care if the FAs are inconvenienced? (They don't). Most DAL stations hold coach boarding until the 1st round is served anyhow. And I've seen this same problem on an MD88. Guess DAL should dump them too, lol?
Oh please! How often do you actually rely on a GPS approach to get in somewhere? I have been flying for and airline for 15 years and I can count on one hand how many times I've done an actual GPS approach in line flying. And it's always been into places like Dothan, Alabama or Fayetteville NC. Everywhere else you're flying an ILS, and Cat II is Cat II. Unless you've got an autoland, you're in the same boat as all the other RJs.
Please don't. I'm sure we're all impressed with your whopping 1500+ hours in both airframes (lateral move anyone?) but that doesn't make you an expert on route planning. I know you love your Big Shiny Real Jet With Engines Under The wings, but at the end of the day, it's still just an RJ.
. My post was not bashing the CRJ in any way nor was it bashing any airline, we were simply discussing differences in AC and flexibility, yet you feel inclined to puff out your chest and start personal attacks, boy, I'de love flying with you on a 4 day (sarcasm)
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,533
Likes: 1,129
Getting a little defensive about the miracle E Jet aren't you? 
The fact remains there is no significant difference or advantage in getting the E jet over the larger CRJ's at this point for DL. But how could that be? The E Jet is this radically superior game changer and only those who have it can succeed?

The fact remains there is no significant difference or advantage in getting the E jet over the larger CRJ's at this point for DL. But how could that be? The E Jet is this radically superior game changer and only those who have it can succeed?

#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
The defensive comment was in reference to the "shut up and color you stupid pilot" vibe about anyone disagreeing with you not having the cranial capacity to "count beans". That's how it came across, but again whatever.
This order in question likely isn't even for DL or possibly for any US airline, who knows. Who cares. The regionals are going to get whatever planes they are going to get. While I admit the E170-190 series has a nicer cabin with longer range, lower landing mins in some cases and shorter field performance, the fact remains that all of that…all of it…is 100% irrelevant on the vast majority of routes its used on. On those few routes where it truly is a difference maker, DL has plenty of them in the fleet to allocate to those few routes and then some.
The 757 is a superior plane too. But they don't make it anymore. Seems like cost really is the most important factor. The E175 is a nicer tube than the CRJ900. And no one cares. At least no one cares enough to change airlines over it.
#59
I think it's funny how you sit there and criticize everything in my post, and take shots at me, you seem awfully defensive about your CRJ...says the 15+ year lifer at ASA/Expressjet...seems like other people in this thread are discounting alot of your statements
. My post was not bashing the CRJ in any way nor was it bashing any airline, we were simply discussing differences in AC and flexibility, yet you feel inclined to puff out your chest and start personal attacks, boy, I'de love flying with you on a 4 day (sarcasm)
. My post was not bashing the CRJ in any way nor was it bashing any airline, we were simply discussing differences in AC and flexibility, yet you feel inclined to puff out your chest and start personal attacks, boy, I'de love flying with you on a 4 day (sarcasm)
#60
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Im honestly not sure why DL keeps buying CRJ's... AA and UAL are buying Ejets left and right, pax love em, and they are less restrictive to certain airports...a CRJ will always be a CRJ no matter how long the tube is...[/QUOTE]
Ok think about this....in the US Airways system there are a lot of the Ejets. However they are not better and here's why. There are NO EJETS handled by PDT ground services, AKA Express terminals at any hubs. They are all handled at mainline gates with mainline ground folks. And that IS NOT cheaper than pulling up on express ramp and dropping the air stair door. And it takes ONE belt loader, couple guys. Ejet is two belt loaders, and a scissor truck to cater. CRJ needs a golf cart. And if you think that it costs the same to have a crew of PDT Express ground people compared to mainline you are wrong. So just that point alone is enough reason why these airlines keep buying the CRJ product. And this goes for all three majors. Who wants to give up gate space at LGA or ORD when you can stack CRJs five deep and drop the steps. And all three majors have regional ground ops for the Express Connection Eagle end of things for a reason.
As far as undisclosed orders are concerned. No public company can secretly order airplanes with publicly traded funds WITHOUT disclosing what they are buying.....SEC frowns on hiding billion dollar spending.
So chances are its overseas. or a private US airline.
Ok think about this....in the US Airways system there are a lot of the Ejets. However they are not better and here's why. There are NO EJETS handled by PDT ground services, AKA Express terminals at any hubs. They are all handled at mainline gates with mainline ground folks. And that IS NOT cheaper than pulling up on express ramp and dropping the air stair door. And it takes ONE belt loader, couple guys. Ejet is two belt loaders, and a scissor truck to cater. CRJ needs a golf cart. And if you think that it costs the same to have a crew of PDT Express ground people compared to mainline you are wrong. So just that point alone is enough reason why these airlines keep buying the CRJ product. And this goes for all three majors. Who wants to give up gate space at LGA or ORD when you can stack CRJs five deep and drop the steps. And all three majors have regional ground ops for the Express Connection Eagle end of things for a reason.
As far as undisclosed orders are concerned. No public company can secretly order airplanes with publicly traded funds WITHOUT disclosing what they are buying.....SEC frowns on hiding billion dollar spending.
So chances are its overseas. or a private US airline.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




