![]() |
Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
(Post 1833658)
You're missing the point of the change of the CPA. It was initiated by xjt to renegotiate a higher fee per departure and reduce the term length of the agreement so even higher rates can be negotiated sooner. Not to accelerate the demise of lxjt.
Absent United willing to pay more (which doesn't seem likely hence the transfer of aircraft to TSA) or any new contracts with larger aircraft (also unlikely due to scope) L-XJT, dies. |
Originally Posted by air101
(Post 1834682)
Absent United willing to pay more (which doesn't seem likely hence the transfer of aircraft to TSA) or any new contracts with larger aircraft (also unlikely due to scope) L-XJT, dies.
|
Originally Posted by tothebigblue
(Post 1834747)
Good luck to ANY airline to staff and cover the amount of flying XJT (CRJ and ERJ) does should we go under.....Say what you want but the next carrier that flies for UAX is shuttle america and they do 3% of what XJT flies and next lowest for the DAL side is 9E and S5 based off of total flights...just some food for thought
|
If you aren't planning on retiring at XJT then you really shouldn't care any less about the future of the company. Has everyone seen the retirement projections at the all the other real airlines?
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 1832766)
Why do the XJT guys/gals on this board act like the ASA side doesn't exist..??
Let go chief……….. |
Originally Posted by tothebigblue
(Post 1834747)
Good luck to ANY airline to staff and cover the amount of flying XJT (CRJ and ERJ) does should we go under.....Say what you want but the next carrier that flies for UAX is shuttle america and they do 3% of what XJT flies and next lowest for the DAL side is 9E and S5 based off of total flights...just some food for thought
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1834915)
All I've been hearing for the last couple of years from mainline is there's going to be a significant reduction in 50 seat lift and a restrictive limit for lift above 50 seats. Maybe you guys have ear plugs in or I heard wrong. But that right there points to less airframes to staff and less flights to cover. I don't think it's wise to feel you're regional (contract lift) is not able to be replaced. Look at Comair, eagle/envoy for example.
The end state in scope at DAL and UAL allow 125 fifty seat aircraft. It's probably about the same for American. There will be a need for about 400 fifty seat jets in the industry once the dust settles. |
Originally Posted by tothebigblue
(Post 1834747)
Good luck to ANY airline to staff and cover the amount of flying XJT (CRJ and ERJ) does should we go under.....Say what you want but the next carrier that flies for UAX is shuttle america and they do 3% of what XJT flies and next lowest for the DAL side is 9E and S5 based off of total flights...just some food for thought
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1834915)
All I've been hearing for the last couple of years from mainline is there's going to be a significant reduction in 50 seat lift and a restrictive limit for lift above 50 seats. Maybe you guys have ear plugs in or I heard wrong. But that right there points to less airframes to staff and less flights to cover. I don't think it's wise to feel you're regional (contract lift) is not able to be replaced. Look at Comair, eagle/envoy for example.
|
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
(Post 1835105)
The LXJT guys don't have earplugs in...They just stick their fingers in their ears and yell "I CAN'T HEAR YOU"....They all live on that big river in Egypt...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands