Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law >

Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2015, 10:14 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I didn't see anything about a repeal. Just reducing the amount of pax needed to get the subsidy.
The bill also would permit the 2013 boarding figures to remain the qualifying standard for several years to come, buying time for the airports to work out new service solutions while, hoping against hope, that the FAA regulation which is causing this calamity might be re-examined and modified, or even repealed.

This is the start. Wait until they try to sneak it into legislation later this year.
ClearRight is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 10:21 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bedrock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: ERJ, CA
Posts: 718
Default

1500 hr rule was not typical knee jerk reaction either. The families of Colgan victims lobbied hard and hounded congressmen to pass that bill. They also continue to put pressure on those who would renege--unlike ALPA.
bedrock is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:06 PM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock View Post
1500 hr rule was not typical knee jerk reaction either. The families of Colgan victims lobbied hard and hounded congressmen to pass that bill. They also continue to put pressure on those who would renege--unlike ALPA.
Yes. The colgan families are not going to just let this go, and neither are they going to forget.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:22 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: dem big shiny things
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by ClearRight View Post
Then a new federal regulation changed the experience requirements for co-pilots on all airline flights with 10 passengers or more. It cut the Great Lakes Airlines pilot force by at least one third, and the small airline that counts on maximum efficiency to make ends meet suddenly could not staff its full flight schedule in compliance with federal regulations. Service was abandoned at some airports (Sheridan), other airports "fired" Great Lakes Airlines (Rock Springs), and the airports continuing to be served by the carrier saw a demoralizing erosion of service.
Riiiiiight because we need another reason to keep Great Mistakes alive.
OdoyleRules is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:24 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: dem big shiny things
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer View Post
Welcome to the modern Republican Party. Against handouts unless they're the ones getting the money..
Dude don't be dragging politics into this.

Go post over in JetCareers if you want to get into a left vs right scuffle. They're all about that.
OdoyleRules is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:29 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,922
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat View Post
What Enzi fails to address is the fact that people are no longer willing to invest upwards of $100,000 to get into this career and make $18-$24000 a year to start when they can invest the same amount of money in another profession and make significantly more money to start and over the lifetime of their career. Until compensation improves to the point that putting money into this career becomes a smart investment, this will never get better.
This is true. It was one thing to take out a loan you never intended to pay back (most of the DCI Academy, Gulfstream pilots). Now banks don't give loans as easily for flight training. The money has to come from somewhere. It's a lot harder to make the dumb investment when the bank forces the pilot in training to come up with the money some other way.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
This is true. It was one thing to take out a loan you never intended to pay back (most of the DCI Academy, Gulfstream pilots). Now banks don't give loans as easily for flight training. The money has to come from somewhere. It's a lot harder to make the dumb investment when the bank forces the pilot in training to come up with the money some other way.
Don't discount one huge pot of money for flight training. Tons of ex mil use GI bills to finance flight training while getting degrees. I know one particular university whose flight program was majority ex mil using GI bills and foreign students whose government footed the bill. Not very many average Joe Schmoe college kids whose parents were paying for everything. Most of those guys quit after they realized it was not fun having to work somewhat hard to get ratings at an astronomical cost, with a dismal ROI, and having to take classes at the same time. Don't know if that is representative of the larger aviation university population or not.
FaceBiten is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 12:50 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DOGIII's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: and Hold
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes. The colgan families are not going to just let this go, and neither are they going to forget.

On a related note, perhaps someone should fill them in on how the FAA is permitting companies to use disciplinary action against pilots who refuse 2 hour 117 extensions. Sadly, they might be more effective than the unions.
DOGIII is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 10:02 PM
  #19  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiten View Post
Don't discount one huge pot of money for flight training. Tons of ex mil use GI bills to finance flight training while getting degrees. I know one particular university whose flight program was majority ex mil using GI bills and foreign students whose government footed the bill. Not very many average Joe Schmoe college kids whose parents were paying for everything. Most of those guys quit after they realized it was not fun having to work somewhat hard to get ratings at an astronomical cost, with a dismal ROI, and having to take classes at the same time. Don't know if that is representative of the larger aviation university population or not.
When I got the GI bill, it was $18000, about half what a Comm MEL ticket cost, and it didnt cover anything until one got his private. Maybe things are different now, but for me, the GI bill assisted me getting my tickets; I still had to come up with the other half plus room, board, etc.

(That $18,000 worked out to about 3k per year of service: not exactly a windfall.)
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 10:21 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
When I got the GI bill, it was $18000, about half what a Comm MEL ticket cost, and it didnt cover anything until one got his private. Maybe things are different now, but for me, the GI bill assisted me getting my tickets; I still had to come up with the other half plus room, board, etc.

(That $18,000 worked out to about 3k per year of service: not exactly a windfall.)
Montgomery GI Bill is a different story. If you use the post 9/11 GI bill, you can use it for straight up flight training at a 141 school, for all ratings after the PPL. That's capped at $10k per year and not a good use of a GI Bill.

What I saw people doing is going to an aviation university, pursuing a professional pilot degree, and getting both tuition and flight labs paid for, in full, and receiving BAH at the e5 rate on top of that, and a book stipend. The "flight training" costs are part of the degree and not considered vocational, so there is no cap other than the cost of what is in the syllabus. That, my friend, is a windfall, depending on how they set it up. You can make it several hundred thousand dollars if you are efficient and go to a yellow ribbon school. If you already have a degree, and you enroll to get another bachelors in the professional pilot program and take nothing but flight labs, you don't burn much GI bill and they pay a lot for the few credit hours you take. I still have plenty of GI Bill left over to go get an MBA when this aviation career craps on me. And I still have over $50k in my flight account I have to give back to the VA bc my ratings were add-ons and I already had a lot of time, so I ripped thru them and didn't use that much. I could have got sea plane, glider/airplane/helo CFI and ATP, a bunch of joyrides, all paid for by the GI bill, and still would have had enough for a 2 year MBA. There are definitely better ways to use it now than when you did it, but it took some digging and a lucky assignment near one of these schools fornme to find out its true potential.
FaceBiten is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
JayHub
Regional
26
06-15-2012 12:50 PM
flyboyandrew
Regional
278
05-02-2012 05:51 PM
jdr7225
Flight Schools and Training
22
09-13-2011 08:29 AM
vagabond
Leaving the Career
1
12-24-2008 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices