Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law >

Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:36 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
So, they're anti-regulation. But ... pro-subsidy.
Shack. Let's drink beer. Filler if necessary.
surfnski is offline  
Old 03-19-2015, 11:51 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by OdoyleRules View Post
Riiiiiight because we need another reason to keep Great Mistakes alive.
Great mistakes will fold in 3 months if they are lucky. Where have you been
Facebitten is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 07:12 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 125
Default

What Sen. Enzi is missing, as well as the FAA, is that Great Lakes has already effectively repealed the 1500 hour rule.. by operating under the part 135 certificate, Lakes should be able to hire all the pilots they could want. Lakes should not see a degration of service because of the 1500 hour rule because the 1500 hour rule no longer applies to them or their Riverton service. So maybe, just maybe, Enzi should stick to real republican values and stand by the economic laws of capitalism.

I'm all for if they want to redefine the number of enplanements to keep funding or service at airports that need them, but to pressure the FAA to reevaluate its 1500 hour rule, for lakes, which is part 135, is udder insanity. Lakes is actually living proof that even if we eliminated the 1500 hour rule, we'd hire a small handful of 500-1499hr guys and then in a year we'd be right back where we are today.

Lakes isn't suffering some mythical pilot shortage because the FAA is cutting off their source of labor, lakes is suffering because there are so few young people who desire the job of being an airline pilot anymore. Lakes is an example of a repealed 1500 hour rule that still won't save the industry. Until the job becomes desireable again, Lakes and other regionals will continue to suffer staffing issues. This is basic supply-demand, the part 135 exemption that lakes got, and its continued abysmal service record, only shows that this republican should stand by supply-demand economics. This, believe it or not, isn't the governments fault.
BenS is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 07:15 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

I thought it was incredible they got the FAA to sign off on the 135 exemption. Goes to show how flexible the FAA can be with airlines when they want to be.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 07:24 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
I thought it was incredible they got the FAA to sign off on the 135 exemption. Goes to show how flexible the FAA can be with airlines when they want to be.
Agreed.. I just find it funny a senator would still demand they "reevaluate" the 1500 hour rule for an airline it doesn't apply to anyway..
BenS is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 07:43 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by BenS View Post
Agreed.. I just find it funny a senator would still demand they "reevaluate" the 1500 hour rule for an airline it doesn't apply to anyway..
Lakes has 25 captains and are losing 7 a month to other airlines. They are still flying 121. 135 only applies to fo's. I have a friend there hoping he makes it to 1500 before they fold. He's at 1300 now...Lakes is circling the drain. If they pull out of their predicament i will be in shock.
Facebitten is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 08:11 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cyborgmudhen's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiten View Post
Once you legislate a handout, good luck ever taking it away. Have you ever tried to take a bottle from a dependent hungry infant? They scream bloody murder until they get it back. Voting adults who are the beneficiary of handouts they've come to rely on are no different. Only difference is the adults are capable of finding an alternate solution...kind of.
Republicans as hungry infants addicted to handouts.
Well played, FaceBiten, well played.....
Cyborgmudhen is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 08:44 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by Cyborgmudhen View Post
Republicans as hungry infants addicted to handouts.
Well played, FaceBiten, well played.....
I think republicans is the wrong word there.
FaceBiten is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 10:10 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Essential Air Service

My favorite oxymoron.
labbats is offline  
Old 03-20-2015, 10:48 AM
  #30  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: behind 6 banger
Posts: 15
Default

EAS=Welfare air. Some that receive the EAS then turn around and use the subsidy to unfairly lower prices on the competitive non EAS routes. Operators that get a large percentage of revenue from it, would not last long if it went away. Gotta love Crony capitalism....
airtaxi101 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
JayHub
Regional
26
06-15-2012 12:50 PM
flyboyandrew
Regional
278
05-02-2012 05:51 PM
jdr7225
Flight Schools and Training
22
09-13-2011 08:29 AM
vagabond
Leaving the Career
1
12-24-2008 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices