Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
More news bringing the public into awareness >

More news bringing the public into awareness

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

More news bringing the public into awareness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2015 | 08:11 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Default

If it was 15 years ago, most of you wouldn't survive in planes without GPS, TCAS, and an advanced ATC system.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 08:15 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
How about Congress mandating that all code share airlines have their own paint scheme and not that of their major partners.
For what purpose? You can already see who you are going to be flying on and the type of equipment when you buy your tickets. You are assuming people look out the window when they are at the airport.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 08:41 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,530
Likes: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
For what purpose? You can already see who you are going to be flying on and the type of equipment when you buy your tickets. You are assuming people look out the window when they are at the airport.
What would it hurt? Don't think people wouldn't start noticing they aren't on a mainline airplane. Do you think anyone looks at or understands what operated by means? It's a United flight number painted in United colors. Every single person I talk to thinks that if says United on the side it's owned and operated by United.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 08:44 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
If it was 15 years ago, most of you wouldn't survive in planes without GPS, TCAS, and an advanced ATC system.
And you wouldn't survive in the Dark Ages too, probably died as soon as you were born. Your point?
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 08:48 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,530
Likes: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by knobcrk
And you wouldn't survive in the Dark Ages too, probably died as soon as you were born. Your point?
If I had a dollar for every time I watched an old school pilot program the FMS wrong or yell at the iPad or get mad at the computer, I'd be rich.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 10:14 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Captain - Retired
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
... It's a United flight number painted in United colors. Every single person I talk to thinks that if says United on the side it's owned and operated by United.
Don't forget that in many cases it actually is a United jet which is owned or leased by United and simply operated by the regional affiliate. United even owns the slots, the gates, sells the tickets and publishes the fancy magazine in the seat back pocket. United creates and owns the logo on the side of the plane and directly profits from the passengers it flies.

The only thing that's not United is the crews and usually the ground handling personnel...and of course the certificate. This is the very definition of union busting outsourced labor. The bizarre thing is that the unions sanctioned it and allowed it...the very thing unions are supposed to prevent.

Clearly we've come to the point where unions now work for management and not for the workers they supposedly represent. So when are pilots going to wake up and stop voting in these unions....{cough}** Jet**{cough}**blue!!
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 10:37 AM
  #57  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by NineGturn
Don't forget that in many cases it actually is a United jet which is owned or leased by United and simply operated by the regional affiliate. United even owns the slots, the gates, sells the tickets and publishes the fancy magazine in the seat back pocket. United creates and owns the logo on the side of the plane and directly profits from the passengers it flies.

The only thing that's not United is the crews and usually the ground handling personnel...and of course the certificate. This is the very definition of union busting outsourced labor. The bizarre thing is that the unions sanctioned it and allowed it...the very thing unions are supposed to prevent.

Clearly we've come to the point where unions now work for management and not for the workers they supposedly represent. So when are pilots going to wake up and stop voting in these unions....{cough}** Jet**{cough}**blue!!
A union at a major is a necessity. Corporate greed inundates all of our society and the mainline airline industry is no exception. This is one of the few occupations that mandate the protections offered by a union. Otherwise all those 777 captains would be flying for CRJ rates.

I do agree with you about the outsourcing. It should have not happened, but at the time in meant more money in the pockets of pilots who I am sure are mostly retired with a huge pension. They got what they needed out of the deal though....right .
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 10:37 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by NineGturn
Don't forget that in many cases it actually is a United jet which is owned or leased by United and simply operated by the regional affiliate. United even owns the slots, the gates, sells the tickets and publishes the fancy magazine in the seat back pocket. United creates and owns the logo on the side of the plane and directly profits from the passengers it flies.

The only thing that's not United is the crews and usually the ground handling personnel...and of course the certificate. This is the very definition of union busting outsourced labor. The bizarre thing is that the unions sanctioned it and allowed it...the very thing unions are supposed to prevent.

Clearly we've come to the point where unions now work for management and not for the workers they supposedly represent. So when are pilots going to wake up and stop voting in these unions....{cough}** Jet**{cough}**blue!!
It's likely that JB pilots want alpa integration protections if they merge with another alpa carrier.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 10:38 AM
  #59  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

....like Virgin who also just voted in a union for very similar purposes.
Reply
Old 04-24-2015 | 11:13 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
I think our only real shot at meaningful change is getting out of the Railway Labor Act. But Joe Public and Congress would hate that because fares would go up.
I'm surprised more people aren't ticked off about this and that the unions aren't spending more time fighting it versus fighting management that uses it as a stall tactic.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mike Caputo
Hangar Talk
3
10-27-2009 07:12 PM
vagabond
Foreign
2
11-15-2007 04:41 PM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM
Deuce130
Military
29
06-15-2007 11:10 PM
2Lazy
Major
7
05-01-2007 10:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices