![]() |
That is funny..... RAH has scope now? LOL..... OK, is it Scope Mouthwash? LOL...
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 1875815)
Scope within RAH's CBA with the pilot group scope would not allow that.
|
NC update says "This week your Negotiating Committee (NC) discussed, with the Company, Article 1 (Scope), Article 6 (Scheduling), Article 7 (Reserve Duty), Article 8 (Paid Days Off), Article 25 (Duration), and Article 31 (Flying the Line). No Articles have been TA’d since April 23rd".
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here. |
Originally Posted by FEtoFO
(Post 1876484)
NC update says "This week your Negotiating Committee (NC) discussed, with the Company, Article 1 (Scope), Article 6 (Scheduling), Article 7 (Reserve Duty), Article 8 (Paid Days Off), Article 25 (Duration), and Article 31 (Flying the Line). No Articles have been TA’d since April 23rd".
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here. |
Originally Posted by SMACFUM
(Post 1876487)
What exactly is Plan B?
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 1875815)
Scope within RAH's CBA with the pilot group scope would not allow that.
|
Originally Posted by SMACFUM
(Post 1876487)
What exactly is Plan B?
|
At least RAH made money. Always on the bright side.
Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ/NM: RJET) reported financial results for the first quarter of 2015. Republic’s pre-tax income for the first quarter of 2015 was $11.2 million, compared to $22.8 million for the prior year’s first quarter. Republic’s net income for the first quarter of 2015 was $6.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share. The Company incurred approximately $8.0 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for charges related to fleet transition expenses and employee severance costs, which are included in other operating expense. The first quarter of 2015 results also were negatively affected by a reduction in operational reliability. Republic’s operating performance, as measured in block hours, departures and available seat miles was approximately 4 percent lower than planned. |
Originally Posted by mpet
(Post 1875723)
It's like the majors are throwing airplanes at the crappy regionals, whether they can staff them or not, to kill off the respected/decent paying regionals with the knowledge the pilots at said regionals will need to make a backwards move to to crappy regional as they all eventually die.
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 1876118)
That is also in there but wouldn't be applicable under that situation. I think it is worded that any leases must not cause a furlough. But that is meant to protect against leasing to foreign carriers (which we have/are doing. I believe they could get away with leasing the aircraft to foreign carriers under this clause. However, for the domestic market (the situations discussed earlier in the thread) it would not be possible under the current contract.
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 1876192)
Delta extended the 145 contract due to the failure of signing a 50 seat contract with air whiskey. Very simple...
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1877005)
It's prob because Compass raked AA over the coals. Right is not an ideal time to put a bid out for rj flying. It must be way cheaper to extend at a previously agreed contract with pricing. Also I am sure its a super cheap deal for Delta to turn up the pressure on a contractor that runs feed for its two largest competitors in there brand new flagship rjs.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands