Question for CRJ drivers

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 3

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-04-2015 | 10:14 AM

#11

Pilot Sharp

BlueYonder

Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 258

Likes: 0

From: On Top

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nachopilot

Since the CJR shares a common type between the 200, 700, and 900, how do you fill out the make/aircraft model portion of your log book to differentiate between the three? I've been putting just CL65 but am not sure this is right.

In my paper log book I log my CRJ time as CRJ2, CRJ7, and CRJ9. I fly all three. In my electronic log book LogTenPro I created three different types 1 for each all them having the model CL-65. So when I run a report it breaks my time down for the 2,7, and the 9.

06-04-2015 | 10:25 AM

#12

seekingblue

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2014

Posts: 1,255

Likes: 0

From: fifi whisperer

I put CL-65. Since it's the same type. Jetblue didn't care one bit when they looked at my logbook.

Now, I do differentiate between the 320 and 321. But it's personal preference, I suppose.

06-04-2015 | 10:27 AM

#13

Tacos

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2014

Posts: 158

Likes: 0

I separate. Do you want to be looked at as over thorough in an interview, or under. Maybe it won't matter but maybe it will. Your choice.

06-04-2015 | 11:00 AM

#14

Nachopilot

Thread Starter

New Hire

Joined: Jun 2015

Posts: 2

Likes: 0

Thanks for all the input...and no I'm not trying to go to Emirates.

06-04-2015 | 11:11 AM

#15

Senior Skipper

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 1,422

Likes: 0

From: the correct seat

Question for CRJ drivers

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tacos

I separate. Do you want to be looked at as over thorough in an interview, or under. Maybe it won't matter but maybe it will. Your choice.

Maybe they think that you're anal about silly stuff that doesn't matter...Who knows?

With that said, I log separately, but I wouldn't think twice if someone lumped it all together. It's not like 757 vs 767.

06-04-2015 | 11:12 AM

#16

DashTrash508

Line Holder

Joined: Aug 2014

Posts: 36

Likes: 0

From: B-737 CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cujo665

If it's important to separate, I'd put CR2, CR7, CR9....
CL65 is the type, not the make model.

You are exactly right. I have a DHC-8 type rating, but flew the Q400 exclusively. I logged the time as DH8D, which is the model designator for the Q400. It might technically be a Dash 8, but I certainly wouldn't claim experience or proficiency in a -100, -200, or -300.

06-04-2015 | 11:16 AM

#17

Nantonaku

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2013

Posts: 2,578

Likes: 75

I would use the official Type Designator, both ICAO and the FAA use the same codes I believe:

http://cfapp.icao.int/Doc8643/8643_List2_1.cfm

06-04-2015 | 12:38 PM

#18

TalkTurkey

Banned

Joined: Oct 2014

Posts: 2,001

Likes: 0

From: 6 Train - Panhandler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Bockelman

It was an honest question.

Then why did she answer it herself then?

06-04-2015 | 01:02 PM

#19

RJ Pilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 3,041

Likes: 0

From: GV Captain

I haven't logged in 10+yrs but when I did, I just put them all under same column.
From the E135,140,145 and Cl65.

They are all RJ's in the end.

06-04-2015 | 01:20 PM

#20

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 45,144

Likes: 801

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tacos

I separate. Do you want to be looked at as over thorough in an interview, or under. Maybe it won't matter but maybe it will. Your choice.

No need to separate since its one FAA type, unless you know for sure you want to fly overseas.

If you find out later that you need a breakdown you can always sort by tail number.