Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350 >

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2015 | 06:53 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Isn't this new policy just treating the symptom rather than the actual problem?
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 06:57 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

I don't know what all you CRJ slobs are talking about, the Brazilian space shuttle is still flying high in the upper thur-tays.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 07:05 PM
  #53  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
Thank the good Lord for this. Some idiot SKW cowboy was giving me a ride home from Den to Smf and thought it would be a good idea to go up to FL380 (in a 200) because the box said he could. 15 minutes to make it up there all the while losing speed and never could get it above about .64 up there. Coffin corner was smallest I've ever seen.
15 mins would be damn impressive to 380 in fact I've yet to ever fly any RJ that can keep that rate of climb up!
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 07:21 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
Default

After coming from the corporate world where I was used to cruising in the mid 40s and 450-470 was not completely uncommon, it amazes me how skiddish some airline guys are about the mid to high 30s. Also, it amazes me how many bad habits I see like letting the speed drop way off to maintain climb rate, and pilots that seem ok with the fact that they cant get speed up and the nose down in cruise and fly along with a positive deck angle like it's a 172 in slow flight instead of just asking atc to go down 1-2k tolet the speed build.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 07:44 PM
  #55  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Isn't this new policy just treating the symptom rather than the actual problem?
Someone gets it, it's band aids, bottom line is priortization, and it isn't being done. Saving fuel at 380 isn't high on my priority list.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 07:51 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=gtechpilot;1912820]Not really - sounds like the aircraft was operated within its limitations.
Since the supercritical wing prevents the onset of mach tuck when the aircraft is operated within its limitations and the "box" spells out those limitations, coffin corner is a bit of a stretch.[j/QUOTE]

I see what you mean. I inferred that he meant the low speed cue.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 08:06 PM
  #57  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Isn't this new policy just treating the symptom rather than the actual problem?
Complacency and inattentiveness were / are definitely the main problem, but I would say a contributing factor were the Econ speeds that we were requested / directed to fly. There were times we would get an Econ speed as low as .62. About 4 days ago guys were getting ACARS messages telling them they were going too fast. This is a great reason why people who are not pilots need to stay out of the cockpit.

The guys I fly with never concern themselves with the Econ speed and I've never been on a flight where we took it (CRJ200) below .70, even though the majority of the Econ speeds were well below that. I have never had an issue with a slow speed event.

I think the other issue is guys trying to make an extra buck which is pretty sickening. Some folks have that mindset, fortunately it's not one I encounter very often. Truthfully, this is an embarrassment...no doubt about it.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 08:09 PM
  #58  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
Someone gets it, it's band aids, bottom line is priortization, and it isn't being done. Saving fuel at 380 isn't high on my priority list.
I think most guys agree with you CCB. That's no place to Fu*k around with airspeed. Hope all is well.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 08:41 PM
  #59  
Joachim's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 784
Likes: 2
Default

Can we pick up the maturity level a bit? There is probably a good reason SKW is going through this stuff. Maybe their planes are getting old, maybe someone in management is being overly catious. In any case, it's probably not because SKW pilots are inferior. We RJ drivers are all mostly civilian pilots with the same license and somewhere between 1.5k-10k hours trying to make it to our destination safely. Show some respect for your fellow man.
Reply
Old 06-22-2015 | 08:50 PM
  #60  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by prior121
I'm so confused. I thought Skywest pilots were the best of the best??
http://youtu.be/_huL5ynaI8Y
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices