Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350 >

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2015 | 06:10 AM
  #81  
Flogger's Avatar
Part of the problem
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 CA
Default

All I can say is...rats. How do I post a picture to this thing?

Last edited by Flogger; 06-26-2015 at 06:14 AM. Reason: bad link
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 05:47 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice
This happened at AE a few years back. It lead to a major overhaul of the CRJ training curriculum to emphasize high altitude flight in the CRJ. The CRJ-700 is NOT a forgiving jet up high. It needs to be watched. Keep the speed up, and all is fine. Get slow (less than .74), and you're asking for BIG trouble.
Endeavor also has FOQA data indicating some low speed events at altitude. Seems to be a common thread with CRJs up high. We've had memos and training on high altitude stalls on it but nothing like company altitude limitation changes...yet!
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 07:56 AM
  #83  
mooney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
Default

Originally Posted by pa28dakota
Endeavor also has FOQA data indicating some low speed events at altitude. Seems to be a common thread with CRJs up high. We've had memos and training on high altitude stalls on it but nothing like company altitude limitation changes...yet!
It has nothing to do with the CRJ. It has everything to do with pilots that pull back power and then start reading their USA Today. altitude limits won't solve that.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 08:08 AM
  #84  
velosnow's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 61
Default

It's bloody embarrassing it has come to this, the culture of 'fly the block' needs to change like yesterday. We aren't the only operator having issues but the CMO decided to make their point with us apparently. Most of us know better than to fly the ridiculous speeds the magic box spits out but a few incidents are certainly too many.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 08:25 AM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

The most disturbing thing to me about this new policy is the fact that there is a list of the inattentives and that the FAA and OCC will be strictly monitoring. Those two things go against everything that is supposed to be a just culture, which enhances safety. Anything that is even perceived to be less than a just culture increases risk.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 08:56 AM
  #86  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 97
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
The most disturbing thing to me about this new policy is the fact that there is a list of the inattentives and that the FAA and OCC will be strictly monitoring. Those two things go against everything that is supposed to be a just culture, which enhances safety. Anything that is even perceived to be less than a just culture increases risk.
The problem from the regulatory side is that the just culture and company safety culture was supposed to prevent things getting to this level/point.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 09:12 AM
  #87  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
It has nothing to do with the CRJ. It has everything to do with pilots that pull back power and then start reading their USA Today. altitude limits won't solve that.

Pilots stopped picking up that trash about 3 yrs ago.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 09:48 AM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 7
From: 737
Default

AFAIK, the events that took place were mostly 700 a few minutes after level off. The lower altitude limits will hopefully help because it widens the buffer quite a bit so hopefully the readers will catch it before it's too late.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 09:52 AM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
The problem from the regulatory side is that the just culture and company safety culture was supposed to prevent things getting to this level/point.

Ok, but having a list of people that messed up and telling pilots that the OCC and FAA will strictly monitor pilots goes against everything that is supposed to make things safer. Being punitive only entrenches pilots and that destroys any kind of safety culture that was purported to be there. That was the basis of programs like ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, etc. Its anonymous and its non-punitive. And this isn't just from a regulatory standpoint anyway, it's from both.
Reply
Old 06-27-2015 | 09:54 AM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by saxman66
AFAIK, the events that took place were mostly 700 a few minutes after level off. The lower altitude limits will hopefully help because it widens the buffer quite a bit so hopefully the readers will catch it before it's too late.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
...And have more available thrust to help recover.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices