Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350 >

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2015 | 06:08 AM
  #101  
Jet87's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: OO RJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by seekingblue
that's a fair point. However, the events weren't bad enough to put an altitude limitation on the CRJ.
true, SkyWest has had more and worse events. SkyWest has been collecting data on these events for quite a while now and sharing all that info with the FAA. If you know anything about the SLC FSDO and our CMO, its a really bad relationship. SkyWest and the CMO can't get along, and while first thing first is fly the plane. This restriction is a bandaid cover/quick reaction by our CMO.
Reply
Old 06-28-2015 | 06:32 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NormalAbnormal
Wow. Just, wow. 2 words: Joint Authority.
FAR 121.533

(b) The pilot in command and the aircraft dispatcher are jointly responsible for the preflight planning, delay, and dispatch release of a flight in compliance with this chapter and operations specifications.

(d) Each pilot in command of an aircraft is, during flight time, in command of the aircraft and crew and is responsible for the safety of the passengers, crewmembers, cargo, and airplane.
(e) Each pilot in command has full control and authority in the operation of the aircraft, without limitation, over other crewmembers and their duties during flight time, whether or not he holds valid certificates authorizing him to perform the duties of those crewmembers.

I'm not being cynical about it, I was just trying to say that dispatchers are not here to play snitch or second guess the operational control of the PIC.

Last edited by NVUS; 06-28-2015 at 06:45 AM.
Reply
Old 06-28-2015 | 07:23 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fifi whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
FAR 121.533

(b) The pilot in command and the aircraft dispatcher are jointly responsible for the preflight planning, delay, and dispatch release of a flight in compliance with this chapter and operations specifications.

(d) Each pilot in command of an aircraft is, during flight time, in command of the aircraft and crew and is responsible for the safety of the passengers, crewmembers, cargo, and airplane.
(e) Each pilot in command has full control and authority in the operation of the aircraft, without limitation, over other crewmembers and their duties during flight time, whether or not he holds valid certificates authorizing him to perform the duties of those crewmembers.

I'm not being cynical about it, I was just trying to say that dispatchers are not here to play snitch or second guess the operational control of the PIC.
You guys don't have to get an amended release for altitude changes greater than 4,000ft?
Reply
Old 06-28-2015 | 07:51 AM
  #104  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default SKW 200s restricted to 280 and 900s to 350

Originally Posted by NVUS
You assume way too much. Dispatchers plan the flight within the legalities, what you do with it after you push off the gate is all you. If you want to fly through all those thunderstorms the dispatcher routed you around, that's your prerogative. Wanna take it up to FL410 when you were planned at FL280, alrighty then. No one's here to play snitch.

I am assuming that there is a list published. I'm just going off of what someone posted on that. But I'm also going off of the Skywest memo someone that said that occ and the FAA will be strictly monitoring those altitude/speed restrictions. So if it's not a dispatcher who will be snitching, who in occ will be strictly monitoring?
Reply
Old 06-28-2015 | 03:29 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
FAR 121.533

(b) The pilot in command and the aircraft dispatcher are jointly responsible for the preflight planning, delay, and dispatch release of a flight in compliance with this chapter and operations specifications.

(d) Each pilot in command of an aircraft is, during flight time, in command of the aircraft and crew and is responsible for the safety of the passengers, crewmembers, cargo, and airplane.
(e) Each pilot in command has full control and authority in the operation of the aircraft, without limitation, over other crewmembers and their duties during flight time, whether or not he holds valid certificates authorizing him to perform the duties of those crewmembers.

I'm not being cynical about it, I was just trying to say that dispatchers are not here to play snitch or second guess the operational control of the PIC.
You left out 121.533(a) & 121.533(c):
(a) Each certificate holder conducting domestic operations is responsible for operational control.

(c) The aircraft dispatcher is responsible for—
(1) Monitoring the progress of each flight;
(2) Issuing necessary information for the safety of the flight; and
(3) Cancelling or redispatching a flight if, in his opinion or the opinion of the pilot in command, the flight cannot operate or continue to operate safely as planned or released.
In other words, outside of a PIC's emergency authority under FAR 91.3, operational control remains with the certificate holder. A dispatcher along with the PIC could face certificate action if they saw anything unsafe in the operation of a flight and just sat on their hands. Typically deference is paid to the PIC because they are the one there and directly facing the threats to the flight. That doesn't abrogate the responsibility and authority of the dispatcher.

For instance, after leaving the gate, or even if already airborne, the dispatcher can recall the flight. A PIC who ignores those instructions (absent 91.3) is going to be doing a carpet dance.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 01:55 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
Default

Honest question for the Skywest people....

What do you do if the APU is deferred in an unknown state, and the MEL has you limited to 220 KIAS?
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 07:07 PM
  #107  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by wmupilot85
Honest question for the Skywest people....

What do you do if the APU is deferred in an unknown state, and the MEL has you limited to 220 KIAS?
In my experience it was a 300 kt limit. Either that or you run it continuously. Is yours something else?
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 07:25 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by wmupilot85
Honest question for the Skywest people....

What do you do if the APU is deferred in an unknown state, and the MEL has you limited to 220 KIAS?
Is it firewall Friday?
Reply
Old 07-01-2015 | 02:19 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
In my experience it was a 300 kt limit. Either that or you run it continuously. Is yours something else?
Our MEL states that if the door is open or unknown state, that the speed is limited to 220 KIAS or the APU has to run.

Originally Posted by FaceBiter
Is it firewall Friday?
Nope, just thought about it yesterday. I'm not a Skywest pilot.
Reply
Old 07-01-2015 | 04:09 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
In my experience it was a 300 kt limit. Either that or you run it continuously. Is yours something else?
The 220kt limit is on the 700. 300kt is on the 200.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices