Can Legacy Carriers Afford It?
#31
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
#32
You can start by not voting in concessions. Not one single one. Educate everyone you fly with that airlines are profitable and there should only be gains for its employees not cuts. Tell your union to demand high wages when they meet at the table with management. Not 1% raises, big raises.
Unless regional pilots stop bending over for a "competitive" contract and start demanding a more progressive one, you are going to continue seeing this problem. Unfortunately, most go to the regional with the quickest upgrade because they can make captain pay quickly. How about we fight for a better contract and make current first year captain pay, first year FO pay? It may start with the yes voters but it is supported with the garbage that takes their place. When you start seeing fast workers with more unity than airline pilots, you start seeing how ********* up this industry is.
#33
Quit blaming PSA for your own pilot group's problems. Plenty of airlines are still getting non-concessionary contracts despite PSA. And it could be argued that our new contract that was voted in is hardly concessionary. Our new 12 year cap for CAs is only a couple dollars less than the 18 year captain pay under the old contract. All that in exchange for keeping jobs and massive growth. Hardly a bad deal. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at AAG and ALPA. Not PSA. The pilot group at the time voted to save their jobs. And after seeing what happened to Envoy, can anyone doubt that Doug could have easily shut PSA down quickly without even batting an eye? Twice the pilot group voted down contracts, and twice Doug placed aircraft at Mesa. What we have now is growth and movement which in itself is intrinsically valuable. No one is forcing you to stay wherever you are that has lead you to believe that PSA is the cause of your woes.
#34
And 1st year regional FO pay will never be the same as current 1st year regional CA pay. The legacy partners would simply find a way to weasel out of the flying contracts and either start a new regional airline or give the flying to someone else. You people are completely delusional. Should first year pay be higher? Absolutely. No regional FO should have to live on food stamps and struggle to pay bills. But to say that we should start out making CA pay is also completely delusional. If you want to make changes, you have to be reasonable and realistic. And it's not all about the hourly wages. Soft pay makes a huge impact on your bottom line. Fight for trip and duty rigs. Fight to increase first year pay to $35 / hour with 75 to 80 hour minimum guarantee. That would be reasonable.
#35
Not 1 person that negotiated PSA's 2013 contract and the LOA's that followed still work at PSA. Did they do what they had to do to secure their job at mainline? I dunno. Kinda curious that everyone from PSA gets the 190 out of PHL. But the previous MEC got the 757.
#36
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Yes, there is a class of pilots who are both at mainline, and the regionals, who are negotiating to the detriment of pilots for their own personal gain. We call this group an MEC.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Quit blaming PSA for your own pilot group's problems. Plenty of airlines are still getting non-concessionary contracts despite PSA. And it could be argued that our new contract that was voted in is hardly concessionary. Our new 12 year cap for CAs is only a couple dollars less than the 18 year captain pay under the old contract. All that in exchange for keeping jobs and massive growth. Hardly a bad deal. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at AAG and ALPA. Not PSA. The pilot group at the time voted to save their jobs. And after seeing what happened to Envoy, can anyone doubt that Doug could have easily shut PSA down quickly without even batting an eye? Twice the pilot group voted down contracts, and twice Doug placed aircraft at Mesa. What we have now is growth and movement which in itself is intrinsically valuable. No one is forcing you to stay wherever you are that has lead you to believe that PSA is the cause of your woes.
How are those 9 month upgrades going? LOL. Hope Envoy winds up keeping those 700's. Even if they did vote yes as well, it would still be funny.
#38
And I'd like to stop saying that our Alpa leaders volunteer their time. They are reimbursed. Ok maybe not for their whole time. But when was the last time a pilot got paid from the time they show at the airport? What's good for the goose...
#39
PSA screwed everybody's chance at a better contract. Brainless group that voted yes. Absolutely brainless. Don't even try to justify anything. PSA is a complete joke in my book. Talk about not having a grasp on anything that is going on in the world. Even if they voted in something gives AAG a single penny in savings, it's still a braindead move. Live with it now.
How are those 9 month upgrades going? LOL. Hope Envoy winds up keeping those 700's. Even if they did vote yes as well, it would still be funny.
How are those 9 month upgrades going? LOL. Hope Envoy winds up keeping those 700's. Even if they did vote yes as well, it would still be funny.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
They haven't screwed anyone? As I stated, pilots are getting non-concessionary contracts at several companies. Envoy screwed themselves and ended up with a worse deal than if they had taken the original deal. People are upgrading in less than 9 months and we are hiring DECs, so I'm not sure what your point in jest was about exactly. Where do you work? Or are you one of the army of trolls that lurks this board while sitting in their underwear in mom's basement and plays Microsoft flight sim.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



