![]() |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1976632)
"Pilot was coming in 10 knots faster then he should have been [on arrival into Lubbock], co-pilot then radioed tower and told them, which started argument in cockpit as they landed."
I'd believe the scenario where the FO said go around for missing the gate criteria, the CA did not go around, and now you've got an issue. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1976632)
"Pilot was coming in 10 knots faster then he should have been [on arrival into Lubbock], co-pilot then radioed tower and told them, which started argument in cockpit as they landed."
I'd believe the scenario where the FO said go around for missing the gate criteria, the CA did not go around, and now you've got an issue. Especially from a "blog" reader. |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1976624)
Of course, the exact opposite, or something completely different could be true also. Gotta love the web, once Entered, it must be accurate!
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 1976637)
Assuming what you read was true............
Especially from a "blog" reader. |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 1976637)
Assuming what you read was true............
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1976634)
On the 727, if you weren't coming in 10 knots fast, you had an issue.
The good old days.:) Maybe some suit behind a desk wrote in their manual that if you are +10 go around. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1976642)
Oh yea, lots of assumptions. But when the spokesman talks about a pilot altercation but short of fisticuffs without any other details, they invite that.
A spokesman for ExpressJet, the regional carrier that operated the plane, said Monday reports indicated that police were called. Airport police did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. Who can ACTUALLY validate that it EVER got close to "fisticuffs"? ALL you have is this; There was no fight ... there was no physical altercation thankfully I'm NOT defending ANYTHING that happened. Simply pointing out how dumbed down society (NOT YOU) has become for taking things on the internwtz and face value. |
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1976647)
On the DC-9 you added 10 for the wife, 10 for the ex wife, and 10 for the kids.
Maybe some suit behind a desk wrote in their manual that if you are +10 go around. |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 1976648)
Assumptions, all too true.
But sadly, you can get the police called to a plane for just about ANYTHING. Who can ACTUALLY validate that it EVER got close to "fisticuffs"? ALL you have is this; AGAIN, pilots can be a funny breed....... I'm NOT defending ANYTHING that happened. Simply pointing out how dumbed down society (NOT YOU) has become for taking things on the internwtz and face value. |
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 1976651)
I read it as 10knots over the stabilized approach criteria. Of course I'm only speculating:D
So maybe target +20? I would have said, "yo bro, you mind slowing down," but that's just me. Obviously there is more to this story. https://www.globalair.com/dtpp/globalair_00241ad.pdf |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands