Off duty flying
01-07-2016 | 04:13 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Off duty flying
My airline just came out with a notice prohibiting off duty flying for any other commercial operator. In the past it was never an issue as long as it did not interfere with our 121 flying times. We just submitted our off duty flight times to the company so they could keep track.
Im curious if any other airlines have this same restriction
Im curious if any other airlines have this same restriction
01-07-2016 | 04:49 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Piloto
My airline just came out with a notice prohibiting off duty flying for any other commercial operator. In the past it was never an issue as long as it did not interfere with our 121 flying times. We just submitted our off duty flight times to the company so they could keep track.
Im curious if any other airlines have this same restriction
Im curious if any other airlines have this same restriction
01-07-2016 | 06:04 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Im not the most up to date on 117, but I don't think any part 91 flying counts toward the 1000hrs a year. As long as we are 'fit to fly', we should be able to do any outside flying we want.
01-07-2016 | 07:18 PM
#8
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Under the old rules, any commercial flying counted. Under 117 it's just 121 (and 135?).
SKW actually removed the old restriction not too long ago. Basically you can't do outside 121 work, but can do all the 91 (including CFI) that you like. Obviously you can't be fatigued due to moonlighting but that should be inherently obvious.
SKW actually removed the old restriction not too long ago. Basically you can't do outside 121 work, but can do all the 91 (including CFI) that you like. Obviously you can't be fatigued due to moonlighting but that should be inherently obvious.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
