Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
How are we going to get rid of the RLA? >

How are we going to get rid of the RLA?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

How are we going to get rid of the RLA?

Old 03-01-2016 | 03:40 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Gee, this evil, mean, nasty piece of legislation called the RLA was also the structure under which ALL existing mainline pilot contracts were negotiated. You know, the ones where all the FOs are well into 6 figures, sometimes above $200 an hour, and CA rates are that much higher. Go back and look at some of the inflation adjusted rates of the contracts signed just prior to 9/11.

But yeah, TOTALLY anti labor. I mean, no one could EVER expect to get a good contract under the RLA.

Or maybe, just maybe, **** poor regional contracts have nothing to do with the RLA.

But nah, that would take too much thought to reach that conclusion......
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 04:26 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Why is everyone so concerned with RLA? Don't involve your union and just ignore it. Do what you want. Write up the airplanes in the outstation. No over time. Trade down to minimum hours.

I mean you have all the tools you could ever need. Tell your company to find their nearest ointment and apply it generously.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 06:23 AM
  #23  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Aviatrx
It has been explained to me that ALPA fears opening the RLA can of worms because we could end up with something worse for our group imposed by big business. Another case of their lawyers are better and more expensive than ours
I've had this conversation with senior mainline ALPA folks, and this is what they say. Both sides are afraid to open the can of worms. Look at 117, management has to hire more pilots; pilots lost trip efficiency and time at home but now can be forced to block more than before. It is nice to not have 8-hour overnights anymore, but the longer overnights come out of your days off.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 06:45 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

I'm still a bit confused as to why so many people complain , when they know exactly what they are getting themselves into as far as industry , pay , qol. If you want a crappy job go work in a warehouse making 10 bucks an hour and then ***** .Nobody forced you to work at the airlines . If you don't like it then leave and go work a job that requires manual labor and we'll see how fast you come back .
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 07:22 AM
  #25  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mistek89
I'm still a bit confused as to why so many people complain , when they know exactly what they are getting themselves into as far as industry , pay , qol. If you want a crappy job go work in a warehouse making 10 bucks an hour and then ***** .Nobody forced you to work at the airlines . If you don't like it then leave and go work a job that requires manual labor and we'll see how fast you come back .
Pilots complain because there's no alternative to going the regional route. Maybe a few guys make it to a major/legacy going corporate first, but by and large we all have to go through the regional $h17 show.
Originally Posted by FirstClass
Why is everyone so concerned with RLA? Don't involve your union and just ignore it. Do what you want. Write up the airplanes in the outstation. No over time. Trade down to minimum hours.

I mean you have all the tools you could ever need.
Fair points, but you'd really need organization and union pressure to get a significant portion of guys at a given airline to do this, whether from their ignorance, apathy, or lone-wolf mentality.
Originally Posted by 272922
Gee, this evil, mean, nasty piece of legislation called the RLA was also the structure under which ALL existing mainline pilot contracts were negotiated. You know, the ones where all the FOs are well into 6 figures, sometimes above $200 an hour, and CA rates are that much higher. Go back and look at some of the inflation adjusted rates of the contracts signed just prior to 9/11.

But yeah, TOTALLY anti labor. I mean, no one could EVER expect to get a good contract under the RLA.

Or maybe, just maybe, **** poor regional contracts have nothing to do with the RLA.
Regionals are where we need to get rid of the RLA most, but since you bring up historical contracts, before 9/11 senior United guys could make nearly half a million, adjusted for inflation. Today, even after their shiny new Extension, they still lag nearly $200,000 behind that. Maybe with threat of a strike those pilots could've retained their pensions and gotten the Holy Grail of Restoration years ago.
Originally Posted by Aviatrx
It has been explained to me that ALPA fears opening the RLA can of worms because we could end up with something worse for our group imposed by big business. Another case of their lawyers are better and more expensive than ours
Originally Posted by rickair7777
I've had this conversation with senior mainline ALPA folks, and this is what they say. Both sides are afraid to open the can of worms. Look at 117, management has to hire more pilots; pilots lost trip efficiency and time at home but now can be forced to block more than before. It is nice to not have 8-hour overnights anymore, but the longer overnights come out of your days off.
I see where they're coming from but just don't buy it. Not much could be worse than indefinite negotiations where management acts in bad faith and you're unable to prove it. And even when you can, you're told you can't do anything about it. Honestly, what realistic outcome of updated RLA legislation could be worse than what we have? Non-rhetorical question.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 07:35 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
Pilots complain because there's no alternative to going the regional route. Maybe a few guys make it to a major/legacy going corporate first, but by and large we all have to go through the regional $h17 show.

Fair points, but you'd really need organization and union pressure to get a significant portion of guys at a given airline to do this, whether from their ignorance, apathy, or lone-wolf mentality.

Regionals are where we need to get rid of the RLA most, but since you bring up historical contracts, before 9/11 senior United guys could make nearly half a million, adjusted for inflation. Today, even after their shiny new Extension, they still lag nearly $200,000 behind that. Maybe with threat of a strike those pilots could've retained their pensions and gotten the Holy Grail of Restoration years ago.


I see where they're coming from but just don't buy it. Not much could be worse than indefinite negotiations where management acts in bad faith and you're unable to prove it. And even when you can, you're told you can't do anything about it. Honestly, what realistic outcome of updated RLA legislation could be worse than what we have? Non-rhetorical question.
There is always multiple ways to look at issues.

Just because there is no alternate route doesn't mean you are entitled to anything. You can take it or leave it, nobodies twisting your arm.

The airlines themselves have created this issue of the pilot shortage, its theirs to solve. With any luck, regionals will simply go out of business and the flying will be reabsorbed by mainline.

Regarding the union comment, you do not want them involved in any way. If you are going to take on the company with write ups, no overtime, and other pressures, that's on you or a loose knit group of people, but the union cannot in any way be involved or they will be sued. American and Delta are examples of a good idea that had some wrong decisions.

Pilots are weak, as a result management takes advantage of you. But if people wake up, they can realize they have more strength than they though.

Its pretty easy to apply the right pressure. You just need to speak their language- $$$$
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 07:54 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Day4mx
When teachers, firemen, police, public transportation, garbagemen, EMTs, etc etc can all strike as self help, it's foolish to think a pilot group striking would ruin this country.
Huh? Pilots can strike and have in the past.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 07:57 AM
  #28  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

FirstClass, understand and agree, just not sure you could get enough pilots onboard to make a noticeable enough dent in operations without organization, and you can't organize.
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 07:57 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Smutter
Take Jesse James and other black leaders, they pretend to fight for the black man but in the end they do what us white men say. Same with a union they pretend to fight for us but in reality they do whatever the top guys can gain from benefit.
Jesse JACKSON is a black activist. Jesse James is a TV motorhead.

Ignorance is bliss....
Reply
Old 03-01-2016 | 08:02 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Out Of Trim
You have got to be kidding. What planet are you from??
What industry do you work in? Do you not understand the economic impact transportation has? Think railroads, not just jets. That's what the RLA is all about.

Now I can see your argument if you want all the RLA benefits that accrue to railroad employees extended to us. But to get rid of the RLA entirely means economic suicide for America.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MtEverest
Delta
17
08-01-2015 11:04 AM
Magpuller
Regional
40
08-12-2013 09:45 PM
Oldfreightdawg
Major
24
03-27-2009 02:23 PM
Windsor
Cargo
1
03-27-2009 11:47 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
49
10-11-2007 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices