Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Stolen C90 in Tupelo, MS >

Stolen C90 in Tupelo, MS

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Stolen C90 in Tupelo, MS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2022, 11:05 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

Ref the shoot down idea: Any kill is a kill. The F-16 jocks would have been fighting over who got to take the shot, and then it would count on their OERs as an enemy aircraft destroyed. Believe it.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 11:09 AM
  #12  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,274
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot View Post
Ref the shoot down idea: Any kill is a kill. The F-16 jocks would have been fighting over who got to take the shot, and then it would count on their OERs as an enemy aircraft destroyed. Believe it.

Joe
In the case of an airplane occupied only by a hijacker(s), then yeah sure.

But I have a friend who flew an interceptor mission on the morning of 9/11, and it still bothers him to this day that he might have had to splash an airliner full of innocent people. He was seriously conflicted while afterburning to his assigned CAP. As it turned out, no hijackings showed up in his airspace.

If I was in that position, that's a shot I would have gladly let somebody else take, if practical. Fangs-out fighter pilots are not necessarily psychopaths.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 12:34 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Rich would have flowed to AS if he could have pulled off a crash landing.
He did pull of a crash landing.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 01:18 PM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,274
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
He did pull of a crash landing.
There wasn't much "landing" in it.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 04:19 PM
  #15  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
There wasn't much "landing" in it.
The airplane is mostly intact, I’d call that a win.

TiredSoul is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 06:07 PM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,274
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
The airplane is mostly intact, I’d call that a win.

I was talking about Rich, the QX dude.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 06:20 PM
  #17  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I was talking about Rich, the QX dude.
All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 06:38 PM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,274
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.
I would argue a "landing" is something you can survive. At least one occupant, otherwise it's a crash.

A good landing is where you can use the plane again.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 01:04 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.
All takeoffs are optional… All landings, however, are compulsory.
captjns is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 06:01 AM
  #20  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I would argue a "landing" is something you can survive. At least one occupant, otherwise it's a crash.

A good landing is where you can use the plane again.
Then why is it called a “crash landing”?
TransWorld is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KCFLY
Career Questions
4
09-29-2018 08:38 AM
NZNV
Flight Schools and Training
0
01-26-2016 07:52 AM
arizonastpilot
Corporate
8
11-25-2009 04:12 PM
Bri85
Hangar Talk
4
08-13-2007 09:39 AM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
2
10-16-2005 05:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices