Stolen C90 in Tupelo, MS

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 4

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-07-2022 | 11:05 AM

#11

joepilot

Line Holder

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 810

Likes: 0

From: 747 Captain (Ret,)

Ref the shoot down idea: Any kill is a kill. The F-16 jocks would have been fighting over who got to take the shot, and then it would count on their OERs as an enemy aircraft destroyed. Believe it.

Joe

09-07-2022 | 11:09 AM

#12

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 44,931

Likes: 699

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepilot

In the case of an airplane occupied only by a hijacker(s), then yeah sure.

But I have a friend who flew an interceptor mission on the morning of 9/11, and it still bothers him to this day that he might have had to splash an airliner full of innocent people. He was seriously conflicted while afterburning to his assigned CAP. As it turned out, no hijackings showed up in his airspace.

If I was in that position, that's a shot I would have gladly let somebody else take, if practical. Fangs-out fighter pilots are not necessarily psychopaths.

09-07-2022 | 12:34 PM

#13

JamesNoBrakes

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2011

Posts: 4,150

Likes: 51

From: Volleyball Player

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777

Rich would have flowed to AS if he could have pulled off a crash landing.

He did pull of a crash landing.

09-07-2022 | 01:18 PM

#14

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 44,931

Likes: 699

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes

He did pull of a crash landing.

There wasn't much "landing" in it.

09-07-2022 | 04:19 PM

#15

TiredSoul

All is fine at .79

Joined: Sep 2016

Posts: 4,486

Likes: 42

From: Paahlot

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777

There wasn't much "landing" in it.

The airplane is mostly intact, I’d call that a win.

09-07-2022 | 06:07 PM

#16

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 44,931

Likes: 699

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by TiredSoul

The airplane is mostly intact, I’d call that a win.

I was talking about Rich, the QX dude.

09-07-2022 | 06:20 PM

#17

TransWorld

Gets Everyday Off

Joined: Aug 2016

Posts: 6,995

Likes: 1

From: Fully Retired

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777

I was talking about Rich, the QX dude.

All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.

09-07-2022 | 06:38 PM

#18

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 44,931

Likes: 699

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransWorld

All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.

I would argue a "landing" is something you can survive. At least one occupant, otherwise it's a crash.

A good landing is where you can use the plane again.

09-08-2022 | 01:04 AM

#19

captjns

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 6,217

Likes: 52

From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransWorld

All airplanes have an equal number of takeoffs and landings. It just depends if the landing was one where you can taxi the plane to its parking position, and walk away from it.

All takeoffs are optional… All landings, however, are compulsory.

09-08-2022 | 06:01 AM

#20

TransWorld

Gets Everyday Off

Joined: Aug 2016

Posts: 6,995

Likes: 1

From: Fully Retired

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777

I would argue a "landing" is something you can survive. At least one occupant, otherwise it's a crash.

A good landing is where you can use the plane again.

Then why is it called a “crash landing”?