AA LHR
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,914
Don’t Shoot the Messenger.
As per Mr.Boeing's FCTM...
I haven't been with a US Carrier that trained Bounced Landing Recovery.
I haven't been with a US Carrier that trained Bounced Landing Recovery.
Bounced Landing Recovery
If the airplane should bounce, hold or re-establish a normal landing attitude and add thrust as necessary to control the rate of descent. Thrust need not be added for a shallow bounce or skip. When a high, hard bounce occurs, initiate a go-around. Apply go-around thrust and use normal go-around procedures. Do not retract the landing gear until a positive rate of climb is established because a second touchdown may occur during the go-around.
If the airplane should bounce, hold or re-establish a normal landing attitude and add thrust as necessary to control the rate of descent. Thrust need not be added for a shallow bounce or skip. When a high, hard bounce occurs, initiate a go-around. Apply go-around thrust and use normal go-around procedures. Do not retract the landing gear until a positive rate of climb is established because a second touchdown may occur during the go-around.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,220
Exactly. Sim day 4??? "Landings sim." Bounced landings, increasing crosswinds up to max crosswind limits, short runways, heavy weights, etc. KSNA (5776'???) 20R single engine landing at max takeoff weight. KSNA 20L (2886'??) at max landing weight. < It can be done...barely!!!! It takes some cheating. "If you're not cheating you're not trying hard enough."
Why do the KSNA 'nonsense'? Divert fields can be very short. Barrow, Alaska is 6500' after the displaced threshold. 7100' of pavement. Guess where you're often going, even in the winter, if you're doing Polar Ops with an emergency?
Why do the KSNA 'nonsense'? Divert fields can be very short. Barrow, Alaska is 6500' after the displaced threshold. 7100' of pavement. Guess where you're often going, even in the winter, if you're doing Polar Ops with an emergency?
#14
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 249
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,914
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,914
§ 121.423 Pilots: Extended Envelope Training. Added I/A/W 67800 Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 218/Tuesday, November 12, 2013 - Rules and Regulations
b) Extended envelope training must include the following maneuvers and procedures:
(5) Recovery from bounced landing.
Compliance for this CFR was no later than March 2019.
#18
#19
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
I flew for an organization in a combat area that experienced an apallingly high number of damaged aircraft due to mishandled landings. Every instance was a military aviator, operating an aircraft outside his experience, and nearly every case was a bounce followed by a nosegear strike that progressed from bad to severe in one or two oscillations. Conversations with several of those yielded the same, predictable attitudes; they didn't take the airplane seriously. "It's just a ---," they each said. "No big deal." Then they each destroyed an aircraft.
There is absolutely NO reason a bounced landing should result in aircraft damage if one flies out of it, or in a minor case, allows the airplane to touch down again without excess flare. A salvage attempt is what leads pilots into trouble. Training does emphasize the importance of recovery. Poor responses contrary to training negate that value when pilots don't do what they've been trained to do. A single bounce and a recovery should be all it takes, because a bounce should never be allowed to progress beyond that.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,914
There is absolutely NO reason a bounced landing should result in aircraft damage if one flies out of it, or in a minor case, allows the airplane to touch down again without excess flare. A salvage attempt is what leads pilots into trouble. Training does emphasize the importance of recovery. Poor responses contrary to training negate that value when pilots don't do what they've been trained to do. A single bounce and a recovery should be all it takes, because a bounce should never be allowed to progress beyond that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post