Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA… >

PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA?

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2025 | 01:23 PM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,287
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by airman2000
I wonder if DCA tower knew PAT25 was a training flight and thereby given it more attention. ATC's displays could be made to indicate training flights as it could be included in flight plans.
Originally Posted by 60av8tor
This is a good idea. Similar to when a military MEDEVAC unit is actually on a civilian MEDEVAC and attaches that to the call sign.
Except NOT when operating in some of the busiest/congested airpace on the planet.

Sorry, no hand hold/wideberth/training wheels and pushing the airliners out of the way

If it's the mantra that "they were qualified", THEN THEY WERE QUALIFIED

Just like there's no "CA/FO is on IOE" or "line check in progress" for the controller.

Last edited by John Carr; 02-02-2025 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 01:42 PM
  #172  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by airman2000
I wonder if DCA tower knew PAT25 was a training flight and thereby given it more attention. ATC's displays could be made to indicate training flights as it could be included in flight plans.
Everyone is getting wrapped up on the word "training." Not all training is the same. Should we also inform ATC anytime we are doing IOE or getting a line check?
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 01:48 PM
  #173  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by sgrd0q
I have no idea what criteria ATC uses to tell you to go around, but I would have thought a “collision alert” would prompt them to tell the CRJ to go around rather than going to the helicopter to check if they have them in sight.
The CA goes off all the time! Any place with VFR traffic will trigger it. VFR traffic in the pattern at SNA will set it off all the time. That's why the Tower will ask if you have the traffic. I bet that goes off in the DCA tower anytime a helicopter is near the airport.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 02:45 PM
  #174  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
The CA goes off all the time! Any place with VFR traffic will trigger it. VFR traffic in the pattern at SNA will set it off all the time. That's why the Tower will ask if you have the traffic. I bet that goes off in the DCA tower anytime a helicopter is near the airport.
Yes, per my retired SOCAL buddy.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 03:43 PM
  #175  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
The CA goes off all the time! Any place with VFR traffic will trigger it. VFR traffic in the pattern at SNA will set it off all the time. That's why the Tower will ask if you have the traffic. I bet that goes off in the DCA tower anytime a helicopter is near the airport.
Sorry, but this is where the system is broken. Make everyone go around any time there is an alert. Eventually the powers that be should realize it is not working and come up with a solution. (Like no helicopter traffic within 100 ft!!!). Make it as expensive and as cumbersome for the airlines. I don’t care. I like to go around.

And as far as the tower controller - man - that is heartbreaking. I cannot imagine being in his shoes, even if the report comes back saying he did it by the book. He got a CA and could do nothing. All the coulda, shoulda… It is unimaginable.

Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 04:01 PM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 143
Default

^^No one’s fault. Accident waiting to happen. All stop until proven otherwise.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 04:32 PM
  #177  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by sgrd0q
Sorry, but this is where the system is broken. Make everyone go around any time there is an alert.
The system is not broken. The CA system is not designed to prevent mid-airs. It is designed to prevent controllers from getting distracted. To relate it to TCAS, it's more like a TA than an RA. When it goes off, the controller has to verify that at least one of the pilots is maintaining visual separation. It would be really hard to make a system that is sensitive enough the distinguish an actual potential mid-air vs. a plane that is pointing at an aircraft on a parallel runway but is going to turn final before they actually hit.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 05:02 PM
  #178  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by sgrd0q
Sorry, but this is where the system is broken. Make everyone go around any time there is an alert. Eventually the powers that be should realize it is not working and come up with a solution. (Like no helicopter traffic within 100 ft!!!). Make it as expensive and as cumbersome for the airlines. I don’t care. I like to go around.

And as far as the tower controller - man - that is heartbreaking. I cannot imagine being in his shoes, even if the report comes back saying he did it by the book. He got a CA and could do nothing. All the coulda, shoulda… It is unimaginable.
Just spit balling here, but sending lots of planes might create more hazards than it solves.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 05:20 PM
  #179  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
The system is not broken. The CA system is not designed to prevent mid-airs. It is designed to prevent controllers from getting distracted. To relate it to TCAS, it's more like a TA than an RA. When it goes off, the controller has to verify that at least one of the pilots is maintaining visual separation. It would be really hard to make a system that is sensitive enough the distinguish an actual potential mid-air vs. a plane that is pointing at an aircraft on a parallel runway but is going to turn final before they actually hit.
Yes, also per my retired SOCAL buddy.

It's just a reminder for the controller. The appropriate action is to verify visual separation, if not verified then give somebody a vector and/or a climb.

Although they might technically not even be required to verify visual separation, if that was previously called and they're busy with something else time critical. Sounds like it's an SA tool, not a hard guard rail.
Reply
Old 02-02-2025 | 05:51 PM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Sounds like it's an SA tool, not a hard guard rail.
Interesting, and I stand corrected. I would have hoped the tower could do more for me if someone calls me in sight but is looking at somebody else and runs into me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PurdueFlyer
PSA Airlines
174
09-08-2021 08:26 AM
takingmessages
Safety
0
06-21-2020 08:11 AM
F4E Mx
Safety
8
07-06-2019 07:38 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-25-2008 03:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices