Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
CRJ accident at Toronto >

CRJ accident at Toronto

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

CRJ accident at Toronto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2025 | 05:55 PM
  #521  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CGLimits
There is a 686 ft desplaced threshold on 23. The taxiway centerline seems to be around 200 ft from the threshold. So on the video there really is no way to tell where the threshold is. It definitely is not directly in front of the camera where the least distortion is. Sorry but I don’t think the video provides enough data.
The threshold that I’m referring to was/is the displaced threshold. The video provides enough data, because the camera is positioned at J short of 23, and is about 80’ behind the hold short lines. You can triangulate that based off the background building corner and the runway sign that’s on the opposite side of the runway (visible in the video). In the video that corner and sign are aligned from the video’er’s perspective, putting him roughly 80’ behind the hold short line on J for 23. From there you can triangulate where the displaced threshold would be roughly, which from the camera’s perspective would be approximately above the “5” in the “23-05” painted on the ground.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 06:06 PM
  #522  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 345
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

The FDR will supply all the details. The NTSB equivalent will issue the crew info and comms as well.

The video shows ME that this thing pancaked on. Hard. Look at the tail buckle on “touchdown.” Was there a fracture in the right main? Don’t know.

Seems there are two sides here with pilot error vs. structural failure. Well, the report will connect that gap and we will have an answer.

In the mean time, what happens to an Endeavor pilot that flows to Delta but resigns before training is completed? How do they go back to a check airman gig?

Can we put this to rest?
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 06:09 PM
  #523  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 200
Likes: 115
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I'm not disagreeing with you, but look what others have said. 744ButtonPusher says it was 12 fps, you say 16.6. The only way those can be true is if the descent rate was steeper than 3 degrees, but sailing has years of LSO experience and he has called it at 3 degrees. Obviously sailing doesn't know what he is talking about, but even you and 744 have different vertical velocities. And yet the last ADS-B data point was just as the video started and the aircraft descended at 475 fpm. To go from 475 to 1,000 fpm is a large change to the flight path. As I said before, we don't have enough data to make a USEFUL conclusion. The NTSB has access to the actual data that matters. Too many people on this thread have been wrong that even agreeing with your math muddies the water and makes it hard to get any useful information out of this thread.
You tried…people have a desire to feel smart and important. Thankfully there will be official information released eventually.

Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 06:21 PM
  #524  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by Chub
The threshold that I’m referring to was/is the displaced threshold. The video provides enough data, because the camera is positioned at J short of 23, and is about 80’ behind the hold short lines. You can triangulate that based off the background building corner and the runway sign that’s on the opposite side of the runway (visible in the video). In the video that corner and sign are aligned from the video’er’s perspective, putting him roughly 80’ behind the hold short line on J for 23. From there you can triangulate where the displaced threshold would be roughly, which from the camera’s perspective would be approximately above the “5” in the “23-05” painted on the ground.
Wow, I'm impressed (I am not being sarcastic). You seemed to have went to a lot of effort. Most people on this thread have done nothing more than shoot from the hip. But why are you doing this? You seem to really want to know the answers. Just give the NTSB 10 more days and you will get way more than you asked for. Giove it another 18 months and you will get everything. Personally, I am going to wait rather than hold up a protractor to my computer while counting frames.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 06:26 PM
  #525  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
In the mean time, what happens to an Endeavor pilot that flows to Delta but resigns before training is completed? How do they go back to a check airman gig?
Good question, but it may not be relevant. Maybe they realized they would rather be at the top of a small airline than the bottom of a large airline. 20 years as a captain could make a pretty bad FO. The money really isn't that big of a factor late in a career. It will take 3-5 years at Delta to make up for the earning lost to jump ship. That combined with other factors could have been enough to make the captain want to go back to Endeavour. It could even be a personal issue. Maybe their spouse got cancer and he realized he would rather spend the last few years with more days at home.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 06:54 PM
  #526  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 565
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Good question, but it may not be relevant. Maybe they realized they would rather be at the top of a small airline than the bottom of a large airline. 20 years as a captain could make a pretty bad FO. The money really isn't that big of a factor late in a career. It will take 3-5 years at Delta to make up for the earning lost to jump ship. That combined with other factors could have been enough to make the captain want to go back to Endeavour. It could even be a personal issue. Maybe their spouse got cancer and he realized he would rather spend the last few years with more days at home.
Both Delta and ALPA released a statement today addressing those rumors. According to both parties, the story that he flowed to Delta, failed out of training and returned to Endeavor is false.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 08:04 PM
  #527  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by CGLimits
Both Delta and ALPA released a statement today addressing those rumors. According to both parties, the story that he flowed to Delta, failed out of training and returned to Endeavor is false.
What's disputed is that he went back to Endeavor because he failed training. It isn't disputed he flowed to Delta and went back. He's on the Delta seniority list for 3 months in 2022.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 08:15 PM
  #528  
RippinClapBombs's Avatar
Down goes Frazier
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 713
Likes: 187
From: AB FO
Default

Originally Posted by CGLimits
Both Delta and ALPA released a statement today addressing those rumors. According to both parties, the story that he flowed to Delta, failed out of training and returned to Endeavor is false.
What does any of that matter anyways. Anyone that’s been in the left (or right) seat as PM knows any control inputs below 100ft AFE by the PF can’t be anticipated in time to correct the error. Who ever was PF, they bent metal (MLG) and rolled an RJ into the ditch.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 08:23 PM
  #529  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by CGLimits
According to both parties, the story that he flowed to Delta, failed out of training and returned to Endeavor is false.
Are you able to read? They specifically said he didn't fail training. Now don't get me wrong, he could have had training issues and left on his o n before he failed, but Delta never said he failed their training program.
Reply
Old 02-21-2025 | 08:24 PM
  #530  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by CGLimits
Both Delta and ALPA released a statement today addressing those rumors. According to both parties, the story that he flowed to Delta, failed out of training and returned to Endeavor is false.
As discussed earlier, it looks like he most likely resigned. Delta never denied he flowed. They just say he didn’t fail. Could be that he was asked to resign because he was about to fail. Or maybe he had a change of heart. The AA/WO flows have this option to return and keep seniority as long as it’s before the completion of training. I would assume the Delta/Endeavor agreement is similar as they used the same consulting firm as AA when they came up with the flow LOAs.

Last edited by Thedude86; 02-21-2025 at 09:00 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chritz1179
Hiring News
287
03-11-2014 05:44 PM
jackace
SkyWest
66
03-21-2012 04:15 PM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
AlohaFlyer
Hiring News
7
09-02-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices