Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Warning: Disturbing - Jane Wicker Crash >

Warning: Disturbing - Jane Wicker Crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Warning: Disturbing - Jane Wicker Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2013, 07:39 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
peteq's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Side Windin', Bush Wackin', Horn Swagglin' Kraker Kroker
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
I've never understood "wing walking". People don't get out of race-cars and walk all on top of them to show off, nor do they get out of trains and walk all forwards and backwards doing stunts (except in movies). It just seems dangerous to the point of stupid, as you won't have enough time to pull your chute at those altitudes and the consequences are just way too high IMO. This coming from someone that participates in quite a few "extreme" sports, but I tend to judge risk pretty well.
RIP to Jane Wicker, I'm hearing she's a mother of 2. Not to mention the pilot.

Agreed, about wing walking, if I had a 120lb girl on my wing, even in a biplane, I'd roll about 3 layers of duct tape around my hand and the control stick.
peteq is offline  
Old 06-22-2013, 08:49 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
I've never understood "wing walking". People don't get out of race-cars and walk all on top of them to show off, nor do they get out of trains and walk all forwards and backwards doing stunts (except in movies). It just seems dangerous to the point of stupid, as you won't have enough time to pull your chute at those altitudes and the consequences are just way too high IMO. This coming from someone that participates in quite a few "extreme" sports, but I tend to judge risk pretty well.
Just a bit insensitive calling the recently deceased "stupid", don't you think?

I have personally known two wing walkers who had long and successful careers and they were very smart and careful people. And I know people who think that anything involving aviation, underwater sports, equestrian sports, alcohol consumption, and motorcycles is "dangerous". We all do some or all of these things and accept the risks. People die every day doing a wide variety of things that others deem as unnecessarily risky. Thank goodness we live in a time and place where it is possible to do these things because these activities are how we express our freedom. It is how we fulfill our pursuit of happiness.

Clearly Jane Wicker evaluated and accepted risks involved with wing walking and found the equation acceptable. Tragically, something went horribly wrong and she and Charlie Schwenker died doing what they loved.

It is a very sad day and a day of mourning as we have lost two wonderful members of our aviation community.

It would be appropriate and respectful to offer condolences and a decent period of restraint from speculation while our friends are mourned and laid to rest.

8
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 06-22-2013, 09:10 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER View Post
Just a bit insensitive calling the recently deceased "stupid", don't you think?

I have personally known two wing walkers who had long and successful careers and they were very smart and careful people. And I know people who think that anything involving aviation, underwater sports, equestrian sports, alcohol consumption, and motorcycles is "dangerous". We all do some or all of these things and accept the risks. People die every day doing a wide variety of things that others deem as unnecessarily risky. Thank goodness we live in a time and place where it is possible to do these things because these activities are how we express our freedom. It is how we fulfill our pursuit of happiness.

Clearly Jane Wicker evaluated and accepted risks involved with wing walking and found the equation acceptable. Tragically, something went horribly wrong and she and Charlie Schwenker died doing what they loved.

It is a very sad day and a day of mourning as we have lost two wonderful members of our aviation community.

It would be appropriate and respectful to offer condolences and a decent period of restraint from speculation while our friends are mourned and laid to rest.

8
Glad they died doing what they love, but so do base jumpers. I know one person that does wing walking, but I just don't see the point in it. I digress and you are right, they have the freedom to do this if they choose.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-22-2013, 10:38 PM
  #14  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by peteq View Post
Obviously this is a guess, but either the control stick slipped out of the pilot's hand, or the control cables snapped. Definitely it was her weight at the wing tip that pulled that plane into the ground.

When they rolled inverted, that Stearman rolled about her as the CG.
No,.
No,.
No,..

And no.

You do not know what you are talking about so shut it.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 01:40 AM
  #15  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

Relatively high AOA and parasitic drag on wing closest to the camera (left). The wing appears to stall.

Terrible loss to the wing walker and air show community. Lost another one less than a year ago as well.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 03:08 AM
  #16  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt View Post
Relatively high AOA and parasitic drag on wing closest to the camera (left). The wing appears to stall.

Terrible loss to the wing walker and air show community. Lost another one less than a year ago as well.

This, plus it appeared as though he may have flown through his own wake? Not much but just enough to get it to roll just a little bit, and once he was rolling, or stalled, too low to recover. When you are low, slow and upside down, it doesn't take much to upset your apple cart.

It seemed to happen right about the same point where he had started climbing on takeoff. He climbed, circled, rolled upside down, and flew in low very near to the point of where he started his climb.

I don't know if there was any wind at the time, but if it was basically calm, there may have been some disturbed air still there. It reminded me of when I would fly the 360's while getting my PPL, and hit the 'bump' at the finish/start point.

I had a friend who died landing a Smith Mini Plane, just after a Steerman with a 450hp motor had taken off. He got into the wake of the Steerman just as he was flaring, rolled to the right, his wing tip hit the ground and he cartwheeled.

And at another airshow (practice?), there was a KC135 that flew throw the wake of the B52, rolled and crashed, at Fairchild AFB I think, back in the late 80's or early 90's.

Thoughts and prayers to their families.

Last edited by Timbo; 06-23-2013 at 03:24 AM.
Timbo is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 01:48 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WalkOfShame's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Going Mach Chicken
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt View Post
Relatively high AOA and parasitic drag on wing closest to the camera (left). The wing appears to stall.

Terrible loss to the wing walker and air show community. Lost another one less than a year ago as well.
This. Inverted stalled. You can see the pilot push a couple times once inverted. Lost too much energy and not enough time/altitude to gain it back. Hard to tell if the wing Jane was on stalled first or if the pilot tried to do a quick snap roll once he felt the break to try and recover. We'll never know. Very sad and my thoughts and prayers are with their family and friends. RIP.
WalkOfShame is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 02:28 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
No,.
No,.
No,..

And no.

You do not know what you are talking about so shut it.
Perhaps rather then telling someone they're wrong & to "shut it" you should explain why they're incorrect. Then explain what is more likely to have occured. We encourage healthly debate, but also educating each other.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 02:57 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Gear swinger
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Perhaps rather then telling someone they're wrong & to "shut it" you should explain why they're incorrect. Then explain what is more likely to have occured. We encourage healthly debate, but also educating each other.

Couldn't agree with you more.
AcesHigh is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 03:54 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
savall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: French American
Posts: 417
Default

Oh christ... That's awful. I was thinking it seemed like wake / sudden change in the air. What is that altitude ? Looks like it can't be more than 50 ft... Is that a normal level for this kind of stunt ?

I hope this doesn't turn into another thread like the Bagram crash.
savall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Safety
12
08-10-2012 06:38 PM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
BOGSAT
Regional
1
12-14-2009 08:43 PM
Moose
Hangar Talk
8
08-30-2009 09:00 PM
GravellyPointer
Major
17
04-08-2007 07:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices