Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Southwest Lands at Wrong Airport >

Southwest Lands at Wrong Airport

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Southwest Lands at Wrong Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2014, 01:15 PM
  #401  
Line Holder
 
MrDK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Default

IMO the name of the airline matters little if a very rare event, whether that be SWA or DAL.
If it happens again tomorrow it likely will be another big and highly regarded airline.
Besides anything that happened 20 or 30 years ago is hardly relevant anymore.

I think there are only two possibilities here:
1. Equipment (navigation) failure
2. Pilot error

The very plane is back in service and the pilots are not, so take a guess.
MrDK is offline  
Old 01-25-2014, 01:06 AM
  #402  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by MrDK View Post
IMO the name of the airline matters little if a very rare event, whether that be SWA or DAL.
If it happens again tomorrow it likely will be another big and highly regarded airline.
Besides anything that happened 20 or 30 years ago is hardly relevant anymore.

I think there are only two possibilities here:
1. Equipment (navigation) failure
2. Pilot error

The very plane is back in service and the pilots are not, so take a guess.
I absolutely hate the term "pilot error." Yes, it covers the overall obvious cause of what happened, but that is painting a very complex picture with a single color.

The fact is that they took a modern glass cockpit aircraft with all sorts of distance and altitude raw displays plus digital moving map lateral and vertical displays....and they succeeded in landing at an airport 6 miles short of their intended destination.

No crap it was pilot error... how did they manage to make that error?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-25-2014, 01:38 AM
  #403  
Line Holder
 
MrDK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
... how did they manage to make that error?
I doubt you can blame the company and its training and since equipment failure by proxy (the ship is back in service) has been ruled out, I'd guess that what was between two pairs of ears in row zero might e a clue.
MrDK is offline  
Old 01-25-2014, 04:01 AM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
you can't ignore the influence of culture...
There have been three recent wrong-airport landings; SWA, Atlas, and the US Air Force (C-17). Of the three, the USAF is the only one that has had multiple wrong-airport events.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 01-25-2014, 05:45 PM
  #405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 389
Default

You can go ahead and scratch the c-17 off the list they just flew over from Italy and conducted inflight refueling.
vilcas is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 05:35 AM
  #406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by MrDK View Post
I doubt you can blame the company and its training and since equipment failure by proxy (the ship is back in service) has been ruled out, I'd guess that what was between two pairs of ears in row zero might e a clue.
Airlines, through their training programs (which are continuing to evolve) provide their crews with the necessary tools to safely conduct transport of aircraft, passengers, crew, and cargo from point "A" to point "B". At the end of the day, isn't up to the crew to properly utilize those tools provided them?
captjns is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 06:16 AM
  #407  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by vilcas View Post
You can go ahead and scratch the c-17 off the list they just flew over from Italy and conducted inflight refueling.
I wouldn't scratch them off the list. Fatigue might have been a factor, but it's not an excuse. The military does accept more risk in flight ops than the airlines.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 04:24 PM
  #408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN View Post
There have been three recent wrong-airport landings; SWA, Atlas, and the US Air Force (C-17). Of the three, the USAF is the only one that has had multiple wrong-airport events.
Not true. Atlas did it twice.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 04:38 PM
  #409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,674
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
Not true. Atlas did it twice.
What was Atlas's other one?
John Carr is offline  
Old 01-26-2014, 05:06 PM
  #410  
Gets Weekends Off
 
grnclvrs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 442
Default Bye Bye Jumpseat

Looks like the days of getting the actual J/S are numbered.


NTSB: Third person in cockpit could have prompted errant flight | TheHill



NTSB: Third person in cockpit could have prompted errant flight
By Keith Laing


The pilots of a Southwest Airlines flight that landed at the wrong airport might have been distracted by a third person who was with them in the plane's cockpit, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairwoman Deborah Hersman said this week.

Hersman said during an interview on CNN that aired on Thursday evening that her agency was investigating the possibility that the pilots of Southwest's flight from Chicago's Midway Airport that landed erroneously at a small airport in Missouri were discussing something unrelated to the flight they were operating, which was supposed to be destined for Branson, Mo.


"We look at all of the factors involved in our investigations, and I think when we talk about two people in the cockpit, three people in the cockpit; very often, we find that another pair of eyes can be helpful," Hersman said. "But in some situations, people may be talking about things that are no pertinent. We need to really understand what happens in any environment. But generally it's about people working together, having good discipline, having good procedures and knowing what their assigned roles and duties are."

Hersman said the NTSB was also considering the possibility that the errant landing was the result of a miscommunication between air traffic controllers and Southwest's pilots.

"We want to make sure those pilots and air traffic controllers are communicating with each other and that things are well understood," she said. "We want to understand how technology can aid pilots in the cockpit and make sure that mistakes like this don't happen."

Southwest has announced that the pilots of its errant flight have been suspended during the investigations.

The airline offered free flight credits to the passengers who were traveling on the airplane.


Read more: NTSB: Third person in cockpit could have prompted errant flight | TheHill
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
grnclvrs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
reCALcitrant
Military
1
08-14-2012 07:05 PM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
2
07-23-2012 01:59 PM
Pantera
Hangar Talk
12
02-22-2009 03:58 AM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices