Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Phenom 100 plane crash Maryland >

Phenom 100 plane crash Maryland

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Phenom 100 plane crash Maryland

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2014, 08:04 PM
  #21  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver View Post
Guess we can tell the NTSB to go home, you've got it all figured out.
Actually his points are pretty spot-on
satpak77 is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:05 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by NotPart91 View Post
But we do not operate as, nor do we have the unlimited training/flight time as our U.S. Military components.
Unlimited training/flight time?
US military?
Where are you getting this notion?

Where did the military enter this discussion in the first place?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 03:55 AM
  #23  
Retired.
 
Csy Mon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 415
Default

Those rich and low-time guys should have to have a safety Pilot for the first 100 or 200 hours in type when operating a jet, not a toy anymore.
Say a retired airline type with tons of jet time.
Wonder how many hrs and what ratings the Dr. had this time?
Doubt it was 1500 and ATP
Csy Mon is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 04:10 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 161
Default

This may be him.
Attached Images
FlyJay is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 06:02 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SrfNFly227's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
Those rich and low-time guys should have to have a safety Pilot for the first 100 or 200 hours in type when operating a jet, not a toy anymore.
There's already a requirement for that. It's usually only 25 hours though and there are a handful of things that will get a person out of it (previous PIC type, etc.).

I've personally flown with one owner/operator in a Citation Mustang and I can say without any doubt that he didn't think it was a toy. I also went through initial for the Phenom 100 with an owner/operator and I can say that he wasn't going to treat it as such either. In fact, he was paying to get 2 other pilots their PIC types so that he would always have someone to fly with.

The generalities that are thrown around on this site are starting to really get to me. The Phenom is truly an easy airplane to fly, but it has a few gotchas. The brakes and the stall system are two of those gotchas. This isn't an airliner and it isn't a Lear. If you haven't flown in the modern light jets, you should really keep your speculation to a minimum as you really have no idea what you are talking about.
SrfNFly227 is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 06:23 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 795
Default

Originally Posted by SrfNFly227 View Post
There's already a requirement for that. It's usually only 25 hours though and there are a handful of things that will get a person out of it (previous PIC type, etc.).

I've personally flown with one owner/operator in a Citation Mustang and I can say without any doubt that he didn't think it was a toy. I also went through initial for the Phenom 100 with an owner/operator and I can say that he wasn't going to treat it as such either. In fact, he was paying to get 2 other pilots their PIC types so that he would always have someone to fly with.

The generalities that are thrown around on this site are starting to really get to me. The Phenom is truly an easy airplane to fly, but it has a few gotchas. The brakes and the stall system are two of those gotchas. This isn't an airliner and it isn't a Lear. If you haven't flown in the modern light jets, you should really keep your speculation to a minimum as you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Denial of statistics and historical data doesn't make it untrue. You have your head in the sand my friend.

UA
UnusualAttitude is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 06:24 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

The Phenom is easy to fly for professionals, guys are properly trained or more than Weekend Warriors.
The problem is engine failure and other complicated system failures when SPO.

the facts don't shine a good light on this guy since he already has an accident in another airframe.

This accident is likely to reinforce my massive opposition to a 100/300 common type. These owner/operators will buy them a 300 and only be able to pass a 100 ride. Then they are twice as dangerous in twice the airplane.

Prayers go out to all the lives cut short and the families left behind.
RI830 is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:04 AM
  #28  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,723
Default

Originally Posted by SrfNFly227 View Post
There's already a requirement for that. It's usually only 25 hours though and there are a handful of things that will get a person out of it (previous PIC type, etc.).

I've personally flown with one owner/operator in a Citation Mustang and I can say without any doubt that he didn't think it was a toy. I also went through initial for the Phenom 100 with an owner/operator and I can say that he wasn't going to treat it as such either. In fact, he was paying to get 2 other pilots their PIC types so that he would always have someone to fly with.

The generalities that are thrown around on this site are starting to really get to me. The Phenom is truly an easy airplane to fly, but it has a few gotchas. The brakes and the stall system are two of those gotchas. This isn't an airliner and it isn't a Lear. If you haven't flown in the modern light jets, you should really keep your speculation to a minimum as you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Does the Phenom have an AOA indication/warning system? Look down this "Safety" page a bit for the discussion of GA pilots and AOA training.

If you think Doctors shouldn't be flying light jets solo, I agree with you in principle, but do you want to guess how many innocent people were killed on the streets today, buy rich guys, texting or drunk driving?

A hundred maybe?

Want to guess how many rich guys have killed themselves on Harley's?

Or in a Porsche?

Yet no call to ban rich guys from driving cars.

I get upset when ever innocent bystanders are killed by idiots, be it cars or airplanes, perhaps the FAA was lax in letting this guy off the hook after his first crash, but this type accident is nothing new, remember Thurman Munson in his Citation? Or how about Jon Jon Kennedy? At least they didn't wipe out a family on the ground.

Last edited by Timbo; 12-09-2014 at 11:21 AM.
Timbo is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:52 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SrfNFly227's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
Default

No AOA indication on the Phenom. G1000 airspeed tape will show the red stall portion though.
SrfNFly227 is offline  
Old 12-09-2014, 02:29 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

NTSB Sumwalt states the stall warning went on 20 seconds prior to end of FDR data, warning stayed on, and in those 20 seconds there were several pitch oscillations up/down and apparently banking too.



All indications of a Stall/spin accident into the ground by a rich pilot trying to fly a light jet like a Cessna 172 he was following in to the airport.
ShyGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Cargo
11
03-19-2010 09:41 AM
rev4life03
Hangar Talk
0
03-18-2010 10:00 AM
Lone Palm
Flight Schools and Training
11
11-21-2008 11:47 AM
SWAjet
Cargo
3
08-31-2005 06:12 PM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
0
06-28-2005 05:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices