Quote:
Simply put: the only thing that we can do is just sit back, and watch how things will unfold. The FAA could lower the minimums however they want, and it will be legal at the end of the day. I know that I won't complain. I'll just go with the flow...I already have enough stress as it is...ha. I only hope at the very LEAST that the folks deciding these things are keeping safety at the forefront of their minds. Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
There will always be some inequities in life, but at some point there's no ignoring the finite resources. I agree that number of hours is meaningless, but an insurance company sets many of the rules, and a company can either exhaustively test applicants, costing lots of money, or require arbitrarily high hours and the higher overall quality as compared to 250hr-wonders (that do exist). The cost to benefit is just to great to invest that much into interviews and evaluation. It's similar to that when considering the "breaks" that the 141 universities get. It would be more "fair" to allow for testing that would establish lower mins for 61s, but economically it wouldn't go...I support the 1500hr rule.
For the military guys on this forum, here is an article that AOPA sent to me today through Enewsletter:
FAA may ease certification standard to be pilot - Air Force News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Air Force Times