Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
I understood what you were saying quite clearly. So, what would make it “impressive”?
Well, I would say working for NASA with a few trips to the ISS would be impressive. My opinion obviously doesn't matter.
The relevant level of impressiveness depends on the scoring grades your major of choice has set for their ATS. Career changers by definition have lower-than-average experience level compared to their demographic group, and thus will need a boost from their past.
I don't understand why you keep asking me about what I think is impressive because it's pretty darn obvious it doesn't matter. But just to entertain your interest, I'd say a good single field career with natural career progression would work, avoiding sideways moves unless they are required for relocation. Those are things that an HR person would look at.
You're getting stuck with one word here. Perhaps I should've reworded that post. "As a career changer, to be considered by a major, you will need a solid employment history in a field that gives you points on your resume review. You will always be graded against your peers, and being mid-40's with 3000 hours and 2-3 years in aviation will put you way below most other mid-40's applicants. Joining a WO regional with a flow is a great backup plan in that case. But if you have a solid career history and a good story on the career change, then you have many possible paths to take and still end up at a legacy airline."