Completely false!!!
Where do you guys come up with it.
Nobody else has “exclusive” so pretty hard to “align”.
The industry standard word you are looking for is “wholly owned”.

Fortunately UAL says they’re the same. And UAL is who pays all their feed to operate their routes.

There’s something else in regards to international jumpseating that Mesa hasn’t agreed to, right? Does anybody know what is it about and why we don’t want to do it?

You are wrong
You as a Mesa pilot flying the United express aircraft will have priority on your plane.

Your management I hope will not jeopardize the 20 700s that have not been renewed
And the 48 E175 that United owns.

And I stipulated that in my next statement. I chose to pass over the own metal argument when posting my statement. No one is ever going to be able to override own metal.

And jumpseat agreements have nothing to do with management or cpa's.

Jets for jobs was signed by Mesa and plenty of USAir furloughed pilots got left seat on the CRJs out of PHL.


PSA :::Back stabbing the other 2 wholly owns...secret agreement after they lied to the other 2 wholly owns that they are all into this together : Fact

Shows the integrity of the then PSA group and their MEC

How about signing an LOA that they were willing to fly all Mesa’s 900s during Mesa’s bankruptcy cheaper than Mesa does for USAir

Most selfish regional pilot group is was and will be PSA period

Are you serious ?

Yes you will have priority on your own metal

UAL alpa source

Just want to say thank you to the Mesa pilot group. Our new MEC update tonight informed us that you’re not taking any part in the JS denial games of the other 2 groups. Hopefully the details are worked out soon and you’re moved up a group as a non exclusive UAX provider on our flights.

bwaHAHAHAHA

You can't use "in unity" with other pilots until you're in a pilot union.